Mugabe must go. There is no way of putting it kindly. He has outlived his usefulness and has dragged Zimbabwe and its people down. In a continent that is known for extremes in governance, President Robert Gabriel Mugabe excels.

He struts around African countries expecting, and getting, revered treatment as the senior-most leader and the liberator of his country. Ironically, many still believe it to be true, as he lives on his past glory of having kicked the white people out of Zimbabwe.

Neighbouring countries to Zimbabwe are no better. South Africa, still considered the most influential nation in the region, has done little or nothing to persuade Mugabe to relinquish power.

For too many years now, it has been expected of South African President Thabo Mbeki to resolve the conflict in Zimbabwe, but his softly-softly approach has been so ineffective as to make no difference.

Except, that is, to demonstrate to other African countries and the rest of the world just how weak and incompetent Mbeki is. Possibly his personal and domestic problems have detracted him from carrying out his mission, for there are certainly enough issues in South Africa to retain the full involvement of an effective president, had South Africa got one.

So, with the lead African nation unable or unwilling to grasp the mettle and take issue with the problems in Zimbabwe, it enables Mugabe to continue in his despotic ways, believing he is still the saviour of his people, when the very reverse is now true.

He has convinced himself that he remains in power through popularity, ignoring the obvious thuggery that takes place through his well-fed police and army, who kill or critically injure any opposition to Mugabe's Zanu-PF party.

He has retained power through bullying and corruption, stuffing ballot boxes to ensure victory and doing away with any opposition through torture, killing, jailing or their "mysterious disappearances". It has got to the state where people are afraid to speak out against him, his government or his party.

Compelled

Even the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) leader Morgan Tsvangirai felt compelled to flee Zimbabwe after his success in the presidential elections, fearful that he may again be arrested and beaten up for daring to speak out and challenge Mugabe.

The farce of the presidential and assembly elections that took place, with all the delays incurred in announcing the results, exemplifies the machinations that take place under Mugabe's dictatorship.

It has been asked by outside observers if the public are truly against Mugabe and his party, then how is it he manages to stay in power? The answer is simple and one followed by all dictators in corrupt societies.

The trick is to ensure that supporters, their relatives, and the security services are well taken care of. In a society short of funds, make sure they receive more than enough to live in luxury even if the people at their door are destitute and dying.

Ensure the security forces get their pay, with increments and bonuses, and have an adequate supply of food, despite shortages in the market. In other words, a corrupt leader must always protect and look after those around him. Then there will never be a challenge to his supremacy because those "nearest and dearest" have a vested interest in the leader retaining power.

Fear

Probably Mugabe would have stepped aside years ago if it was not for his fear of being prosecuted by his successors for corruption. Or the world court charging him for what is tantamount to the ethnic cleansing of his own people over the years.

There is also a fear of his cronies that they also might be charged alongside Mugabe or that their corrupt earnings coming to an end they will never be able to continue payment of the overseas properties and foreign education for their offspring.

This is why many ministers are secretly making deals with Tsvangirai and his followers, in the hope that either the next government becomes a coalition government, which will let them off the hook, or they get a promise of a clean chit when they leave office. All that, of course, is still in a state of flux and is very much dependent on the result of the presidential run-off, now slated for June 27.

However, let one thing be very clear. While Mugabe may be an obnoxious blot on the landscape, there is no proof that Tsvangirai will be any better. There is evidence that his supporters have also resorted to terrorising Zanu-PF supporters, and there is nothing to say Tsvangirai is any less corrupt than Mugabe.

Sadly, the history of Africa shows all too well that politicians in that continent, once they come to power, become quickly tempted and resort to corruption and all other means to retain control.