The ZIMBABWE Situation Our thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe
- may peace, truth and justice prevail.

Back to Index

Back to the Top
Back to Index

New York Times

Zimbabwe at the Breaking Point

imbabwe, once a shining star in southern Africa, is collapsing under the
disastrous rule of Robert Mugabe. This week, a powerful troika of African
presidents from South Africa, Nigeria and Malawi traveled to Harare, raising
hopes that they were finally prepared to do something about the political
and economic crisis in Zimbabwe. Unhappily, their visit failed to persuade
Mr. Mugabe to open unconditional talks with the opposition.

African leaders, especially President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa, should
take the lead in Zimbabwe. The chaos there poses the greatest immediate
threat to neighboring South Africa, and it undermines the laudable effort by
African leaders to promote economic partnership with the West on the basis
of internal reforms.

Zimbabwe is a mess. There are drastic shortages of food and fuel, the rates
of inflation and unemployment are soaring, coercive land reforms have shrunk
agricultural production, and public frustration is at a breaking point. Mr.
Mugabe, one of the main leaders of the struggle against white minority rule,
blames whites, political opponents and Britain for his woes. But nobody
really questions any longer that the greatest blame lies with Mr. Mugabe's
inept, corrupt and brutal rule. In national elections last year, Mr.
Mugabe's victory was so tainted that Zimbabwe was suspended from the
Commonwealth.

We understand why African leaders are reluctant to lean on Mr. Mugabe. Mr.
Mbeki shares Mr. Mugabe's roots in a liberation movement, and the
instability of many African regimes makes their leaders loath to promote
regime change anywhere. But halfhearted and reluctant gestures by Mr. Mbeki
and others have achieved nothing in Zimbabwe except to make the opposition
skeptical about their intentions.

It is imperative for the presidents - Mr. Mbeki, President Olusegun Obasanjo
of Nigeria and President Bakili Muluzi of Malawi - to demand that Mr. Mugabe
open immediate talks with the leading opposition party, the Movement for
Democratic Change, on ways to end the crisis and hold free and fair
elections. Zimbabwe cannot endure five more years of Mr. Mugabe's misrule.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Talk about Talks.

 Well they came - in their presidential jets, the red carpet was rolled out
 and they were then taken in air conditioned luxury to State House for
lunch  and three hours of discussions with Mugabe. Then they went off to the
 Sheraton and there they met with Morgan Tsvangirai for 90 minutes. The
 discussions with Mugabe were with no others present and those with Morgan
 included Welshman Ncube and Gift Chimanikiri.

 After the discussions with Morgan, Obasanjo and Muluzi returned to State
 House to report on their discussions to Mugabe and they then left for
their  respective homes. Mbeki simply left after the talks with Morgan for
 discussions with Kabila in the DRC and then back to Johannesburg.

 What was achieved? Well I listened to the VOA, BBC, SABC and the ZTV/ZBC
and  the spectrum ranged from the SABC which was quite upbeat - inter party
talks  will start soon, and the ZBC/ZTV (the mouth of Moyo), which simply
restated  the propaganda line that is being followed by the government here.
For
those  of you who are not familiar with the latter it basically runs as
follows:
 "The President (Mugabe) was elected by the majority of Zimbabweans as
state  president for 5 years in 2002, he will complete his term of office.
If the
 MDC (British and American sponsored and inspired) want to talk about the
 situation then we are ready to talk - but they must first recognise Mugabe
 as President."

 The international media was probably more accurate than either the SABC or
 the local propaganda machine - which does not tell the truth at any time.
 They said, progress, but no break through. Then I talked to analysts from
 both South Africa and Zimbabwe. Their view was much the same except for
one  person from a South African think tank who said what was clear was that
the  gap remained, regional leaders were not prepared to force Mugabe from
office  and the next stage was "talk about talks". I think that just about
summed
it  up.

 What would these entail? Obviously the MDC cannot accept that Mugabe heads
a  legitimate government - he clearly does not by any measure. We also will
not  accept any form of unity government, this would be suicide for the MDC
and
 we are bit more savvy than that. So while Mugabe says he will not talk
until  we recognise him and drop the court challenge, there will be no
talks. No
 progress. Since this is simply not acceptable to all concerned, the only
 alternative is "talk about talks" as suggested by South Africa. I heard
this  morning that Muluzi is inviting the parties here to Malawi for
discussions -  perhaps that is the next move. It would fit with Mbeki not
wanting to be
 seen as being the man in the middle.

 Then there is the shadow of the United States - Kansteiner is in the
region  and they will be working in the background to ensure that matters do
not
 rest there.

 Also in play is the economy and we are rapidly running out of time if we
are  going to be able to retrieve anything on this front. It is now too late
to
 get a decent wheat crop into the ground - another year lost. Preparation
for  the 2003/4 tobacco crop should have been completed last month - if we
have
 no significant changes by June, the next crop will also be in jeopardy.
 Summer crop preparations should start now - early ploughing, procurement
of  inputs, we can delay for perhaps 4 months - but no more. If we have a
repeat  of this past seasons activity then we will face yet another year of
 shortages and hardship. In the past year we grew no more than 25 per cent
of  our needs - how much longer can we realistically expect the rest of the
 world to feed us?

 Then the energy situation - we have very little liquid fuels in the
country,  electricity is being restricted and coal is problematic despite
our huge
 reserves because of the decline in the performance of the railways and a
 shortage of diesel. Inflation is spiraling out of control and life has
 become almost impossible for many - if not the majority. Food shortages
are  endemic - fats, oils, flour, bread, maize meal, cereals, baby foods are
all  in short supply. Prices in informal markets are 4 to 10 times official
 levels. It is understood that we have two weeks wheat supplies in the
 country and then we run out of wheat, bread and flour altogether.

 Exchange rates are on the move again - the Zimbabwe dollar is now trading
 against the Rand at about 180 to 1 (officially 105 to 1) and the prospect
is  that rates will soften even further shortly. Since these rates determine
 prices for the majority of the things we consume, this means higher prices
 in the near future. Economic migration, already at record levels is
 accelerating and when you drive to Beitbridge you can see small groups of
 young people walking to the border - they do not even have the price of a
 bus fare.

 So how do we take the situation after the visit by the three presidents?
Not  business as usual, that is for sure, more pressure on Mugabe - very
much
so.
 A break through? No.

 This is deeply disappointing to all concerned. We are running out of time
 for things to be worked out to save the country from a complete collapse
and  things must be speeded up if we are to avoid a real humanitarian and
 economic crisis.

 The other thing that has happened as a consequence of the delay in
securing  a start to the process of return to legitimacy - is that we no
longer have
 the time for any sort of extended period before a legitimate government
can  be formed to tackle the urgent problems of the country. A year ago we
could  have supported a year's transition - today every week is critical. If
we
 settled on a 90-day transition to new elections we would struggle. There
 really is no time to waste at all - its time that talk about talks got
 started or else we will all be swept away by the tide of time.

 Such talks will not have any chance of success if pressure is not
maintained on the parties to get an agreement. That was true in the
Lancaster House
 process, it was true in the South African transition. The difference here
is  that we are talking on the deck of a sinking ship.

 Eddie Cross
 Bulawayo, 7th April 2003.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Toronto Star

Zimbabwe's ugly fin de régime


GORDON BARTHOS

Job Sikhala has been arrested 20 times. Maybe more.

He's been beaten by the police. Tortured by having electric shocks applied
to his tongue, genitals and toes. Forced to drink toxins. Urinated on by his
torturers.

He's an elected Member of Parliament in Zimbabwe.

Sikhala, who's 30, belongs to opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai's Movement
for Democratic Change (MDC). And he's not the unluckiest MDC supporter.
Nearly 60 have been murdered.

"My horrendous experience has hardened my resolve," he told the Mail &
Guardian newspaper, "that it is better to die for the freedom of the
Zimbabwean people than to remain silent."

Comrade President Robert Mugabe's officials promise to bring Sikhala's
police torturers to book. But few are betting on it.

After all, Tsvangirai himself is on trial for plotting to kill Mugabe, on
dubious evidence, and could be sentenced to death.

Little wonder if 12 million Zimbabweans despair of seeing Mugabe's divisive,
increasingly brutal 23-year reign lurch to a close any time soon.

Still, pressure is building for a negotiated resolution to Zimbabwe's worst
political and economic crisis since independence in 1980.

U.S. President George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair are pushing
for "regime change." So is the Commonwealth, which suspended Zimbabwe in
2002 after Mugabe's supporters narrowly stole the presidential election from
Tsvangirai through murder, intimidation and fraud.

Presidents Thabo Mbeki of South Africa, Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria and
Bakili Muluzu of Malawi were in Harare this week trying to bring Mugabe and
Tsvangirai together for talks. They failed. But Obasanjo found "on both
sides ... earnestness for negotiations to be resumed." Clearly, Mugabe is
feeling some heat.

Alert to their growing isolation, members of Mugabe's own ruling Zimbabwe
African National Union - Popular Front (Zanu-PF) party are reaching out.

Parliamentary speaker Emmerson Mnangagwa and army chief Gen. Vitalis
Zvinavashe have approached Tsvangirai to serve in a post-Mugabe transition
government. Other Zanu-PF figures have also called for power sharing.

And inside Zimbabwe, trade unions have launched crippling political strikes
demanding change.

This undermining of Mugabe from within is an encouraging development.

Zimbabweans shouldn't have to suffer five more years of autocratic, inept
rule.

Mugabe's coercive land reform - dispossessing white farmers - has slashed
output by half. Just a few hundred white farmers remain, from 4,000 two
years ago. Food, power and fuel are in short supply. Three-quarters of the
population is jobless. Half are hungry. Every week 2,500 die of AIDS-related
illness.

Yet amid this suffering, Mugabe spends $500 million on the military.

Zimbabweans have now lived with three years of state-sanctioned political
violence, fierce suppression of dissent and harassment of the press.

The only way forward is for Mugabe to agree to bow out early, so that some
transitional power-sharing arrangement can be struck between Zanu-PF and the
MDC leading to early, credible, internationally supervised elections.

But that will require regional politicians to crank up the pressure,
something they have been reluctant to do.

Mbeki, whose country supplies much of Zimbabwe's power on credit, could
unseat Mugabe with a flick of the switch. But Africa's revolutionary
liberation leaders are notoriously loath to break with their own.

That is a betrayal not only of Zimbabweans but also of Africans who are
struggling to reform their governments and economies, hoping to qualify for
more generous foreign investment, debt relief and aid. It also encourages
autocrats to hang on.

"The process has begun but I fear there will be ... more blood spilled
before Mugabe actually steps down," says John Makumbe of the Zimbabwe in
Crisis Coalition.

That Mugabe, at 79, is doing such terrible damage is a tragedy. For the
country. For him. Some still hail Comrade President as one of the nation's
liberators. But their voices grow fainter with every passing day.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gord Barthos writes the Star's editorials on foreign affairs.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Business Day

There is hope for Zimbabwe, but only if Mugabe goes

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mbeki must not flinch from the opportunity to exercise his considerable
strengths of negotiation and persuasion
THERE are two distinct futures for Zimbabwe. One is with President Robert
Mugabe remaining in power, a bleak prospect promising much of the same as in
the past decade: an imploding economy and worsening human rights. It is no
future at all.

The other is more promising, and requires a new leadership. Zimbabwe faces
huge economic and social challenges as a result of Zanu (PF)'s misrule
including 200% inflation and 75% unemployment.

In the best-case scenario, rebuilding the Zimbabwean economy will be the
task of a generation and will not attract the bloated billions pouring into
Iraq and Afghanistan. But at least a new president and administration would
offer the commodity most Zimbabweans now crave: hope. Programmatically, it
would also offer the prospect of improved governance, including the
restoration of the rule of law and an accountable polity.

For Zimbabweans, a new, credible, popularly elected and accountable
government would go a long way to restoring their faith in democracy and
would rekindle national pride, rather than shame and fear.

Most importantly, a new government, with the backing and support of the
international community, could set about the immediate task of putting food
in the bellies of the 6million Zimbabweans currently living on a knife-edge
of hunger.

The regional dividend of a new and legitimate government in Harare is
incalculable. It would not only present the Southern African Development
Community region with a further fillip after the Angolan and Democratic
Republic of Congo successes, but also turn the political tide in favour of
the New Partnership for Africa's Development (Nepad).

These two scenarios should not be breaking news to anyone.

The real question has, however, been to get from Mugabe's rule to something
more acceptable, and what new leadership might look like and mean for Zanu
(PF) without Mugabe.

The latter concern, combined with the party's own insecurities in
consolidating its rule from liberation movement to political party and a
visceral fear of being seen to be doing the bidding of the west, apparently
have been the main reasons behind the reluctance of the African National
Congress to move publicly and decisively in removing Mugabe.

It was not as if there were no alternatives between quiet diplomacy or
invasion, as Pretoria has claimed since 2000. The range of policy options
from more public pressure, engagement with the Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC), public and private sanctions, to more martial responses has
been on public offer for those opting to investigate.

Yet with talk of Mugabe's departure now imminent, it would seem Pretoria has
bitten the bullet in finally moving publicly on Harare.

There are many advantages to doing so, far outweighing the domestic costs of
being seen to be acting on behalf of the US or UK governments. Critically,
such action signals the end of the complacency that has cost Nepad greatly
in terms of negative international perceptions.

Mugabe's continued misrule has flown in the face of Nepad's promises about
good governance, democracy and Africa.

Should Mbeki be successful in devising an acceptable exit strategy for his
Zimbabwean counterpart, there will also be some dividends in terms of
reducing the levels of suspicion and mistrust following Pretoria's
utterances on the Iraqi intervention.

But the principal benefit will be to Zimbabweans themselves a fact too often
lost on those who have preferred to portray this as a racial conflict or one
between Zimbabwe and its formal colonial master, Britain.

Six-million Zimbabweans more than half the population face food shortages
this year, and many could die as a result. The critical fall in agricultural
output in the former breadbasket of the region is a direct result of
Mugabe's so-called land redistribution programme.

The currency has collapsed, with a wide gap persisting between official and
unofficial exchange rates. The depth of the fiscal crisis is borne out by
the fact that this year's deficit is estimated at half of the $2bn
expenditure budgeted.

In the longer term, Zimbabwe's recovery will require large-scale
international financial and technical aid. Given the right conditions of
good governance, democracy and respect for human rights and the rule of law,
the parlous economic situation could, in time, be reversed.

In the absence of overwhelming domestic and international pressure that
would lead to forced regime change, the obstacles to Mugabe's removal should
not be underestimated.

He is a highly intelligent and skilled survival politician, and a
redoubtable negotiator. Mugabe will no doubt attempt to buy time and play
presidents Thabo Mbeki and Olusegun Obasanjo along while he does so. This
makes drafting and publishing a Zimbabwe road map and timeline for
transition all the more important.

SA will also have to rebuild relations with the MDC, especially the
leadership of Morgan Tsvangirai, as such relations have become defined by
animosity and perceptions that a partisan Pretoria favours Zanu (PF).

Now is the time for Mbeki to exercise his considerable strengths of
negotiation and persuasion the type of strengths that spared SA a frightful
civil war in KwaZulu-Natal in the run-up to the 1994 elections.

Mbeki now has both history and the international community on his side. It
is not the time to lose nerve and flinch.

There are simply no downsides perceived or otherwise for Pretoria in
engineering the removal of Mugabe. Nepad will benefit, and the image of the
continent will improve.

Most importantly, when Mugabe departs office, it will be a great day for
Zimbabwe and perhaps the real start of the African renaissance.

Dr Mills and Hughes are respectively the national director and the
parliamentary research fellow at the SA Institute of International Affairs,
based at the University of the Witwatersrand.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Business Day

Fuel supplies to Zimbabwe slow down to a mere trickle

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harare Correspondent

ZIMBABWE's fuel crisis is deepening as the government is increasingly
failing to pay suppliers due to forex shortages.

Official sources said yesterday the country was lurching towards its worst
fuel shortages yet.

The last consignment of fuel of 439000l came two weeks ago. The country is
surviving on supplies trickling in through efforts of small-scale dealers.

The consignment two weeks ago was imported for the justended Zimbabwe
International Trade Fair in Bulawayo.

"We are facing a completely dry situation now," a source at the National Oil
Company of Zimbabwe (Noczim) said.

"Maybe we will receive diesel because government wants to keep industry
running."

The current tobacco-selling season has not improved foreign currency
supplies and as a result the Zimbabwean Reserve Bank's external payments
committee cannot provide sufficient money to critical sectors of the economy
as defined in the prioritisation of external payments guidelines.

Fuel, electricity, grain and drugs are the main import priorities for
Zimbabwe.

The country is also in the grip of a severe electricity crisis. Some
companies have either scaled back their operations or closed down in the
past month due to power shortages.

The situation is likely to get worse as the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply
Authority (Zesa) has failed to meet its deadline to pay SA power utility
Eskom 16m.

Zesa, whose debt to regional suppliers has now ballooned to an amount of
$150m, introduced load-shedding last month, after Mozambican and Democratic
Republic of Congo power companies reduced supplies.

Zimbabwe imports up to 35% of its electricity from Hydro Cahorra Bassa of
Mozambique, Eskom and Snel of Congo.

Cahorra Bassa used to supply the country with 450 megawatts of power, Eskom
with 150 megawatts, while Snel supplied it with 100 megawatts.

However, Cahorra Bassa has cut supplies to 150 megawatts and Snel to
nothing. Eskom has threatened to cut the power supply if Zesa fails to pay.

To make matters worse, Zesa has to pay in foreign currency for using Zambian
power lines for drawing power from Mozambique. Despite its bankruptcy, Zesa
is looking for 1,3bn to increase power-generation capacity at the Hwange and
Kariba stations to 1000 megawatts. Currently, they are operating at below
half that capacity.

Zesa is planning to pour 600m into Hwange and 400m into Kariba, while
transmission and distribution infrastructure would require almost 400m.

As Zimbabwe's fuel situation deteriorates drastically, government says it is
now moving to import oil from Angola.

Zimbabwe has been making efforts to get fuel supplies from Iran and Sudan,
but nothing has materialised due to its low credit rating with those
countries.

Zimbabwe needs 40m a month for fuel.

Noczim is currently scrounging for Z60bn to import fuel.

The government recently tried to reduce Noczim's debt by Z6,7bn to improve
its creditworthiness, but the debt went up again. It now stands at Z21,6bn.

Kuwait's Independent Petroleum Group is reluctant to continue supplying
Zimbabwe with the much-needed fuel because it is owed more than $70m.

Sources said Libyan company Tamoil has stopped supplying because of
nonpayment.

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi now considers Zimbabwe "a dangerous credit
risk" because of its cash flow squeeze and political uncertainty.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

SABC

            MDC welcomes Zimbabwe court ruling on harsh media law
            May 08, 2003, 11:15

            The Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), the main opposition in
Zimbabwe, has welcomed the country's highest court ruling after it struck
down sections of the tough media legislation.

            The MDC called the verdict a victory against a law it said was
as "unconstitutional as it was primitively vindictive", while media groups
said the entire package must be thrown out. "This was a symbolic victory for
the media fraternity, but the fight is not over because the punitive nature
of the whole legislation is frightening," said Andy Moyse, a co-ordinator of
the watchdog Media Monitoring Project of Zimbabwe.

            Zimbabwe's highest court yesterday struck down sections of tough
media legislation which had made it an offence to publish "falsehoods",
after the government conceded the provisions were unconstitutional. The
Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act took effect shortly
after President Robert Mugabe's controversial re-election in March 2002,
which the opposition and Western governments said was marred by fraud.
Mugabe accuses independent local and foreign media of backing the opposition
and driving a Western propaganda campaign to discredit his seizure of
white-owned farms for redistribution to landless blacks.

            Several journalists have been detained under the Act, which also
gives the state power over who can work as a journalist in Zimbabwe. Hours
after the court ruling, immigration officers swooped on the home of a
foreign correspondent working for Britain's Guardian newspaper, in what his
lawyer said appeared to be a renewed attempt to deport him.

            Appeal against deportation order
            Lawyer Beatrice Mtetwa said Andrew Meldrum, a US reporter, was
not at his house at the time and had since sought refuge elsewhere. Meldrum
is currently appealing a deportation order issued after he was acquitted of
reproducing a false story.

            The media law had made the publication of "falsehoods"
punishable by a heavy fine or a jail sentence of up to two years, regardless
of the circumstances of publication. Government lawyers conceded these
provisions violated the constitutional protection of freedom of expression
and said the law would be amended to make it an offence to publish
"falsehoods" out of malice or recklessness.

            Zimbabwe is undergoing its worst crisis in more than two
decades, with acute shortages of food and fuel and soaring unemployment.
Britain and Australia said yesterday that they would work to put
international pressure on Mugabe to change the political climate in the
former British colony and that Zimbabwe would not be allowed back into the
Commonwealth until a return to democratic rule was under way. The group
suspended the country last year after observers said Mugabe's re-election
was flawed. - Reuters
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Independent (UK)

      Mugabe's 'brutal' police chief lands role at Interpol
      By Basildon Peta Southern Africa Correspondent
      09 May 2003


      Zimbabwe's police commissioner, who is accused of being a driving
force behind President Robert Mugabe's brutal repression of opponents, has
been appointed honorary vice-president of Interpol.

      Augustine Chihuri is on a list of close Mugabe associates subject to
sanctions by the European Union and the United States because of the
regime's human rights abuses. Yet it emerged yesterday that he has accepted
an invitation from the international police organisation's President, Jesus
Espigares Mira, to take up the honorary post. The Zimbabwe Herald, the
state-owned newspaper which is a mouthpiece for the Mugabe government, said
the appointment was a "show of confidence" in the Zimbabwean police force by
the international community.

      Interpol's decision to honour Mr Chihuri comes as repression of the
political opposition and the privately-run media in Zimbabwe has been
dramatically stepped up. Andrew Meldrum, the Guardian's Zimbabwe
correspondent, was in hiding yesterday after state agents, believed to be
immigration officials, raided his home on Wednesday night.

      The Tory foreign affairs spokesman, Michael Ancram, called on the
Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, to protest against Mr Chihuri's "staggering"
appointment. In a letter to Mr Straw, he said: "During the brutalisation and
rape of Zimbabwe, the police force has stood by and done nothing to uphold
law and order. Indeed, the police force is cited in many cases of human
rights abuses.

      "[Chihuri] is one of Mugabe's closest cronies. What kind of message
does this send to the Mugabe regime? Far from being ostracised, it is being
honoured."

      This is not the first time that Mr Chihuri's links with Interpol have
come to the attention of Zimbabwe's critics. Last year he was admitted to
France, despite the EU's travel ban, for a meeting at the organisation's
Lyon headquarters. Back in Zimbabwe he has overseen the systematic torture
of thousands of suspected opposition supporters , including MPs and
activists, in police custody. He has defied several court orders to stop
illegal seizures of white-owned farms and to act against any opponents of
the Mugabe regime.

      Using sweeping security powers, Mr Chihuri has ordered arbitrary
arrests, banned opposition meetings and generally made it impossible for
civic society to organise and operate freely in Zimbabwe. In 2000 he broke
the law by declaring his support for Mr Mugabe's ruling Zanu-PF party. This
violated the Police Act, which requires the police to be non-partisan.

      Since 2000, Mr Chihuri has allowed Mr Mugabe's militant supporters to
seize farms violently and murder 14 white farmers and more than 300 black
opposition supporters in political violence. He also been involved himself
in evicting a white farmer from a prime property in Mazowe district, which
he has since permanently occupied.

      Farmers and opposition supporters have given up expecting help from Mr
Chihuri's men. Several opposition supporters have recently died after being
tortured by the police.

      Mr Chihuri was also linked to a high-profile corruption case in which
top Zanu-PF officials - including Mr Mugabe's wife, Grace - looted a state
fund meant to built low-cost houses for junior civil servants to build
mansions for themselves.
       9 May 2003 06:27
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Independent (UK)

Zimbabwe must have 'road-map' to legitimacy, says US
By Basildon Peta Southern Africa Correspondent
09 May 2003


The American envoy for Africa called for a "road-map" to achieve "regime
legitimacy" in Zimbabwe yesterday, which would inevitably mean the departure
of President Robert Mugabe from office.

In a telephone interview with The Independent, the Assistant Secretary of
State, Walter Kansteiner, who is in Botswana, said that Washington hoped the
latest initiative by African leaders to intervene in the Zimbabwe crisis
would produce a blueprint for the future. This would shape a transitional
process leading to a new government which would respond to the needs of
Zimbabweans.

Mr Kansteiner said "regime change" was not the phrase he would use to
describe his government's policy on Zimbabwe but "regime legitimacy".

"Regime legitimacy is what everyone is striving for. Can and will and how do
the people of Zimbabwe have their voice heard? How do the governing
institutions in Zimbabwe reflect legitimacy in the eyes of the Zimbabwe
people," he said.

In an article published in South Africa yesterday, the widely respected
national director of the South African Institute of International Affairs,
Greg Mills, said there was no hope for Zimbabwe unless President Mugabe
goes. He said the departure of Mr Mugabe could perhaps be the real start of
the so-called African Renaissance.

Asked whether he agreed with such a sentiment, Mr Kansteiner said: "I think
the people of Zimbabwe need a government which is responsive to their needs
and suffering. If that happens, that would be a good day indeed."

The presidents of South Africa, Nigeria and Malawi, Thabo Mbeki, Olusegun
Obasanjo and Bakili Muluzi visited Zimbabwe this week for talks with Mr
Mugabe and his main adversary Morgan Tsvangirai. But their plan to set the
stage for the retirement of the 79-year-old president hit a snag when they
failed to broker a dialogue between Mr Mugabe and Mr Tsvangirai, leader of
the Movement for Democratic Change. Mr Mugabe demanded full recognition by
Mr Tsvangirai before talking to him. Mr Tsvangirai refused, saying he would
not recognise someone who "stole" an election.

The three African leaders, however, vowed to continue with their efforts to
bring the two to the negotiating table.

Mr Kansteiner said the US government fully backed their initiative but was
not involved in it. "Our role comes in once the people of Zimbabwe and the
regional leaders have mapped out a course," he said.

"Where we can assist is with technical assistance, in preparation for an
electoral process. We can assist on reconstruction and re-development. We
have resources not only financial resources but also technical expertise. I
think that's the big role that we can eventually play," he said.

However Mr Kansteiner's use of the term "road-map" has parallels with plans
for peace between Israel and the Palestinians backed by the US, Russia, the
European Union and the United Nations. The model involves the successful
sidelining of the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in favour of a new Prime
Minister, Mahmoud Abbas.

The Independent reported last week that America, Britain and South Africa
had voiced their preference for the former Zimbabwean finance minister,
Simba Makoni, as a suitable interim figure to take over from Mr Mugabe.

On the eve of their arrival in Zimbabwe, Mr Mbeki and his colleagues were
attacked in President Mugabe's tightly controlled state media which
suggested they were visiting Zimbabwe as "agents" of the British and US
governments.

Mr Kansteiner said the crisis in Zimbabwe was not sustainable: the economic,
humanitarian and civil liberties crises had all converged into a major
political crisis needing an urgent solution. He noted that it was important
that the three African presidents had met both Mr Mugabe and Mr Tsvangirai.
The transitional process required agreement from the two leaders, he said.

Many Zimbabweans have been quoted as calling for President George Bush to
invade the country and topple their leader as he did in Iraq. Mr Kansteiner
ruled out such a prospect.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

SABC

            Reporter hides from Zimbabwean authorities
            May 08, 2003, 18:45


            A US journalist based in Zimbabwe is hiding from immigration
officials who swooped on his home in a suspected renewed attempt to deport
him, his lawyer said today.

            Andrew Meldrum, a correspondent for Britain's Guardian newspaper
who has worked in Zimbabwe for 22 years and has permanent residency, was
away when officers descended on his home last night, saying they wanted to
speak to him.

            Beatrice Mtetwa, Meldrum's lawyer, says her client will stay
away from immigration authorities until they spell out why they were looking
for him. "Until then, he will remain at an undisclosed location. Meldrum
remains willing to answer questions to bona fide officials providing they
follow proper legal procedure which requires that they state their enquiry
upfront," she said.

            Mtetwa said there was room to suspect that the five officers who
came to Meldrum's home in five vehicles, including a van with shaded
windows, had a "foul play" motive.

            Meldrum is currently appealing a deportation order issued after
he was acquitted of reproducing a false story.

            Zimbabwe's highest court yesterday struck down sections of tough
media legislation which had made it an offence to publish "falsehoods",
after the government conceded the provisions were unconstitutional.

            The Supreme Court made the ruling in response to an appeal by
two Zimbabwean journalists charged last year with publishing a false story
after reporting that government supporters had beheaded a woman opposition
member in front of her two children.

            The story, which Meldrum reproduced, proved to be false and the
Daily News, its originator, said it was misled by a source. Critics say new
media laws adopted by President Robert Mugabe after his controversial
re-election last year are designed to stifle press freedom but the
government says they are meant to bring order to journalism.

            Mugabe accuses private local and foreign media of backing the
opposition and driving a Western propaganda campaign to discredit his
seizure of white owned farms for landless blacks. Several journalists have
been detained under the laws, which give the state power to licence
journalists in Zimbabwe. - Reuters
Back to the Top
Back to Index

SABC

            Europe blasts Mbeki's lack of action against Mugabe
            May 08, 2003, 16:00


            A South African government proposal that succeeded in blocking
an examination of the human rights situation in Zimbabwe by the United
Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) has drawn strong criticism both at
home and abroad.

            Zimbabwe escaped international scrutiny yesterday after 28
mainly African and Asian countries in the 53 member UNHRC supported a South
African "no action" motion on a European Union resolution calling for debate
on the issue.

            The draft resolution had expressed deep concern over continuing
abuse by the Zimbabwean government, including assaults, torture, cases of
rape, arbitrary arrests and attempts to clamp down on the country's
judiciary.

            Today, the Democratic Alliance said it was "deeply disturbed and
shocked" to learn South Africa had led such a proposal. "Why would the South
African government propose that the UNHRC not take a firmer stand on
Zimbabwe? It boggles the mind," Colin Eglin, DA foreign affairs
spokesperson, said.

            The DA has repeatedly called on the government to intervene in
the Zimbabwean crisis. "The breakdown in law and order, the botched land
reform programme and the disregard shown for human rights in Zimbabwe will
not only have a destructive impact on that country, it will also drag down
the entire Southern African region. The Mugabe regime is a test of the South
African government's resolve to protect the best interests of this country
and the entire region; sadly, we are failing this test," Eglin said.

            Mugabe a 'despotic leader' says European parliamentarian

            Meanwhile, Michael Gahler, a European Parliament MP, a member of
the parliament's largest political group, said the South African government
had turned its back on Zimbabwe's people, who were suffering under a
'despotic leader'.

            "The more the situation in Zimbabwe deteriorates, the more the
Mugabe regime apparently can count on the unconditional support from the
'old boys network' existing between the ANC and Zanu-PF," he said in a
statement.

            Gahler, who headed the European Parliament's observer delegation
to the 2000 parliamentary elections in Zimbabwe, said Mbeki's silent
diplomacy towards Mugabe had obviously failed, "but open support of an
oppressive regime prevails".

            He said a former liberation movement such as the ANC risked
being labelled racist "if it legitimately fights a white minority regime,
but later turns its back to the suffering people under a black despotic
ruler".

            The Department of Foreign Affairs was not immediately for
comment today. - Sapa
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Load Shedding Hits Parts of Harare's CBD

The Herald (Harare)

May 8, 2003
Posted to the web May 8, 2003

Harare

The power cut that hit business in parts of Harare's central business
district on Tuesday morning was a result of load shedding.

The electricity interruption was experienced from 11am but power resumed
later in the afternoon.

Several office blocks were unable to use their lifts, a serious problem in
high rise buildings, and electronic tills became inactive.

Some buildings and companies have generators or uninterupted power supply
facilities for sensitive computer equipment.

But others, including many shops, closed for the day. The most affected were
food outlets, grocery shops and supermarkets.

Load shedding is seriously affecting production in industrial areas and the
farming community.

Farmers said their winter crop, which greatly depends on irrigation, has
been greatly affected while industrial production has been crippled by these
power cuts.

Zesa introduced load shedding in March due to the reduction of power imports
from Hydro Cahora Bassa in Mozambique.

A Zesa official, Mr Daniel Maviva, said load shedding was also a result of
technical faults being experienced from the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Zimbabwe imports 60 percent of its power from Eskom in South Africa, Cabora
Bassa and Snel of the DRC.

The country's economy is not generating enough foreign currency to enable
Zesa to pay for full requirements.

"Zesa is making arrangements to improve the current power situation by going
into negotiations with Zimbabwe's exporting companies to settle import bills
in foreign currency," said Mr Maviva.

He said the power company was working flat out to boost local power
production through the refurbishment of the Hwange and Kariba power
stations.

The country's peak demand is about 2 000 megawatts. Hwange can, at full
capacity, generate 920MW and Kariba South 666MW.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

SABC

            US praises SA peace efforts in Zimbabwe
            May 08, 2003, 15:00

            The United States has lauded efforts undertaken by President
Thabo Mbeki and his Malawian and Nigerian conterparts, in brokering a peace
dialogue between the Zimbabwean ruling Zanu-PF and the opposition Movement
for Democratic Change.

            Walter Kansteiner, US Assistant Secretary of State for African
Affairs, maintained an opposing view to that of British Prime Minister Tony
Blair that maximum international pressure be exerted on the Harare
administration to restore democracy and human rights.

            He was speaking in Botswana, at the opening of a trade facility
which will enable regional states to benefit from expansion of trade
opportunities with the United States through the Africa Growth and
Opportunity Act (AGOA).

            Kansteiner praised the Southern African initiative to deal with
the Zimbabwe issue, and described it as a regional problem. "We think it's a
strong indication that the continent and the region are aware of the dire
situation that's taking place in Zimbabwe, both humanitarian wise as well as
economic. We are thrilled that they are engaged and we are encouraged by
it," he said.

            The US has also rejected claims that it may be phasing out the
AGOA. In recent months Washington has embarked on bi-lateral free-trade
talks with South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Swaziland, and Namibia. The act
seeks to give sub-Saharan African states an increased access to US markets.
This has led to fears among other African states that they could lose out on
trade benefits under AGOA. However, Kansteiner hinted that Washington was
keen to extend the AGOA. "There are some really very good benefits that come
immediately with AGOA that's why we want that extension," he explained
Back to the Top
Back to Index

VOA

Zimbabwe Government Continues Harassing Journalist Despite Court Ruling on
Media Law
Peta Thornycroft
Harare
08 May 2003, 17:34 UTC


Zimbabwe's Supreme Court has struck down a clause in the country's
restrictive media law that made it a criminal offense to publish falsehoods.
But while that decision was praised by defenders of press freedom in
Zimbabwe, hours after it was issued government officials visited the home of
an American journalist who has for months been the target of a harassment
campaign led by state media.

Four men who said they were from the department of immigration arrived at
Andrew Meldrum's home late Wednesday, but he was not there. The men told his
wife they wished to interview him and eventually left saying they would
return with reinforcements.

Mr. Meldrum is an American citizen with permanent resident status in
Zimbabwe, which under the country's constitution guarantees him the same
rights as a citizen. Based in Harare, he is a correspondent for the British
newspaper The Guardian.

Beatrice Mtetwa, a lawyer for the American journalist, says immigration
officials refused to reveal why they want to see the journalist.

In an account in The Guardian, the lawyer says from her experience it
appeared that immigration officials intended to deport Mr. Meldrum. When
they come in the night, she is quoted as saying, they want to lock you up
and they can take you away when no one can see it being done.

Earlier this year, Mr. Meldrum was served with a deportation order minutes
after the lower court acquitted him of violating Zimbabwe's media law by
publishing a falsehood.

But the high court suspended Mr. Meldrum's deportation, and that suspension,
according to his lawyers, is still in force.

Mr. Meldrum's acquittal caused official embarrassment, as he was the first
journalist to be tried and then acquitted for publishing a falsehood - the
section of the media law that the court struck down Wednesday.

The government tried Mr. Meldrum for a report he did for the Guardian in
which he quoted a local newspaper as saying that a woman had been beheaded
in front of her children by ruling party supporters. The local newspaper
story was false and the Guardian published a retraction.

Since his acquittal, Mr. Meldrum, like may other journalists, has not been
granted accreditation by the government appointed media commission. He is
regularly accused by the state media of being a spy.

The whereabouts of Mr. Meldrum and his wife are not known. His lawyer said
they are both safe but anxious.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

News update

Women of Zimbabwe Arise (WOZA) will walk to express the wishes of mothers
ahead of MOTHER'S DAY! WOZA is a women's civic action platform formed to
break the silence and lobby on everyday issues affecting women and their
families.

We will meet on Saturday 10th May - from 10 to 11:30am
at Bulawayo City Hall Car Park and at Africa Unity Square, Harare
The Zimbabwe Republic Police were notified as required under the Public
Order Security Act (POSA) by a single letter copied to both Stations.

Yesterday, Bulawayo District Office wrote informing us that they were not
approving the walk.
Harare District Office wrote approving the walk but requested the organisers
to remain within the environs of Africa Unity Square. A condition we
accepted.

We would like to recognise the solidarity shown by the Officer Commanding
Harare, whom we believe is female for allowing WOZA to conduct its peaceful
procession and wish our Harare sisters well!
We abhor the insensitivity of the Officer Commanding Byo District, Chief
Superintendent P Matyatya in refusing allow the exercising of our
constitutional right of assembly. He obviously needs to further appreciate
the need for women to lobby for equality.

WOZA knows that the struggle for women's rights will not be an easy one but
that Saturday remains another step to be taken for the courageous. We remain
firmly committed to ensuring the profile of women is elevated even against
the backdrop of the current crisis. Women make up 56% of the population and
have a majority right to exercise their voices in saying ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
The message we will deliver come hell or high water is ...
The time has come to put our house (Zimbabwe) in order; we carry our brooms
to symbolize this!

In happy times we would receive gifts on Mother's Day but times are tough so
all we ask of our husbands, sons, brothers, bosses, and leaders is ..
To LOVE us, RESPECT US and allow us our DIGNITY as MOTHERS of the Nation!
Provide FOOD fairly priced and available on the shelves.
Our families need PEACE - Stop violence, rape, and torture!

Zimbabweans working together can sweep away the dirt - a clean home is a
healthy home.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
Zimbabweans learn to LOVE again and say NO to VIOLENCE and YES to LOVE!

TO PARTICIPATE ON SATURDAY 10 MAY YOU WILL NEED TO:
ATTEND the walk in large numbers in a spirit of LOVE and TOGETHERNESS.
CARRY a flower to show the message of LOVE and as an appeal to end the
VIOLENCE or
CARRY your grass broom to indicate that it is time to sweep away the dirt.
PLEASE follow instructions of the leaders and marshals at all times.

Contact WOZA (Byo) Jenni 011 213 885 or (Hre) Getrude 011 411 842
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Fuel Supplies to Zimbabwe Slow Down to a Mere Trickle

Business Day (Johannesburg)

May 8, 2003
Posted to the web May 8, 2003

Dumisani Muleya
Johannesburg

ZIMBABWE's fuel crisis is deepening as the government is increasingly
failing to pay suppliers due to forex shortages.

Official sources said yesterday the country was lurching towards its worst
fuel shortages yet.

The last consignment of fuel of 439000l came two weeks ago. The country is
surviving on supplies trickling in through efforts of small-scale dealers.

The consignment two weeks ago was imported for the justended Zimbabwe
International Trade Fair in Bulawayo.

"We are facing a completely dry situation now," a source at the National Oil
Company of Zimbabwe (Noczim) said.

"Maybe we will receive diesel because government wants to keep industry
running."

The current tobacco-selling season has not improved foreign currency
supplies and as a result the Zimbabwean Reserve Bank's external payments
committee cannot provide sufficient money to critical sectors of the economy
as defined in the prioritisation of external payments guidelines.

Fuel, electricity, grain and drugs are the main import priorities for
Zimbabwe.

The country is also in the grip of a severe electricity crisis. Some
companies have either scaled back their operations or closed down in the
past month due to power shortages.

The situation is likely to get worse as the Zimbabwe Electricity Supply
Authority (Zesa) has failed to meet its deadline to pay SA power utility
Eskom 16m.

Zesa, whose debt to regional suppliers has now ballooned to an amount of
$150m, introduced load-shedding last month, after Mozambican and Democratic
Republic of Congo power companies reduced supplies.

Zimbabwe imports up to 35% of its electricity from Hydro Cahorra Bassa of
Mozambique, Eskom and Snel of Congo.

Cahorra Bassa used to supply the country with 450 megawatts of power, Eskom
with 150 megawatts, while Snel supplied it with 100 megawatts.

However, Cahorra Bassa has cut supplies to 150 megawatts and Snel to
nothing. Eskom has threatened to cut the power supply if Zesa fails to pay.

To make matters worse, Zesa has to pay in foreign currency for using Zambian
power lines for drawing power from Mozambique. Despite its bankruptcy, Zesa
is looking for 1,3bn to increase power-generation capacity at the Hwange and
Kariba stations to 1000 megawatts. Currently, they are operating at below
half that capacity.

Zesa is planning to pour 600m into Hwange and 400m into Kariba, while
transmission and distribution infrastructure would require almost 400m.

As Zimbabwe's fuel situation deteriorates drastically, government says it is
now moving to import oil from Angola.

Zimbabwe has been making efforts to get fuel supplies from Iran and Sudan,
but nothing has materialised due to its low credit rating with those
countries.

Zimbabwe needs 40m a month for fuel.

Noczim is currently scrounging for Z60bn to import fuel.

The government recently tried to reduce Noczim's debt by Z6,7bn to improve
its creditworthiness, but the debt went up again. It now stands at Z21,6bn.

Kuwait's Independent Petroleum Group is reluctant to continue supplying
Zimbabwe with the much-needed fuel because it is owed more than $70m.

Sources said Libyan company Tamoil has stopped supplying because of
nonpayment.

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi now considers Zimbabwe "a dangerous credit
risk" because of its cash flow squeeze and political uncertainty.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

VOA

Political Analyst Says Zimbabweans Are Cautiously Optimistic About Their
Future
Ashenafi Abedje
Washington
08 May 2003, 16:27 UTC


Zimbabwean political analyst Brian Raftapolous says most Zimbabweans are
cautiously optimistic about the outcome of current regional efforts to
resolve the country's political and economic crisis.

Professor Raftapolous, who teaches development studies at the University of
Zimbabwe, says the three leaders spearheading the effort have baggage of
their own. He says President Robert Mugabe is keenly aware of this and won't
miss a beat in exploiting it to advance his advantage.




On the other hand, Professor Raftapolous says the current efforts represent
an African initiative, lending them more weight on the continent than if
they were initiated by Americans or Europeans. He says there is a
differentiated African view of the situation in Zimbabwe, just as Africans
and Westerners comprehend the reality differently.

The analyst says what matters most are the views held by Zimbabweans, which
he maintains are largely critical of President Mugabe and his policies.
Professor Raftapolous says if the current efforts result in his stepping
down, it's not yet known who might succeed him. But the analyst says in the
event a free and open election is organized, opposition leader Morgan
Tsivangerai may end up succeeding Robert Mugabe.

Professor Raftapolous says any new government will likely carry out a
thorough audit of past land policies and try to reengage the international
community on the basis of a more transparent program for the future.

Professor Raftapolous spoke from Harare with English to Africa reporter
Ashenafi Abedje.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

JAG OPEN LETTER FORUM

Email:
justice@telco.co.zw; justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Internet: www.justiceforagriculture.com

Please send any material for publication in the Open Letter Forum to
justice@telco.co.zw with "For Open Letter Forum" in the subject line.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 1: Paul T Nyathi - Secretary for Information and Publicity

May 2003

Ruling on Aippa (Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act) a
victory for democracy.

The High Court's decision in Striking down Section 80(1) a and 80(2) which
are the most lethal sections of the Access to Information and Protection of
Privacy Act is a victory for democracy and must surely have left an egg in
the face of Jonathan Moyo who stubbornly refused to listen to all the
voices of reason that told him that the law was as unconstitutional as it
was primitively vindictive.

This people's victory against tyranny and all institutions that this regime
has attempted to build to deny people their freedoms adds more misery to
the beleaguered regime, which has been flattened by one blow after another
from the forces of peace.

Moyo's wish to come up with a piece of legislation that he would use to
fight personal wars with journalists, while denying the people of Zimbabwe
access to real information, in preference for his trivia and hogwash in the
Herald and ZBC has finally been given the boot which it deserves. While he
licks his wounds the people of Zimbabwe are celebrating. We eagerly await
the outcome of the ruling on challenges to other sections of this
legislation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Letter 2: Ben Freeth

Rule of Law Case - Important!

Reasons for case:

The case will show through the courts how the rule of law has broken down
in all agricultural provinces of Zimbabwe.  This, in turn, will hugely
strengthen our cases for compensation and restitution.  It will also bring
pressure to bear on the regime's apologists who claim that the rule of law
is present in Zimbabwe.  The third aspect of the case involves the
beginning of the process of accountability for those individuals who have
wilfully been a part of bringing so much suffering to ordinary Zimbabwean
citizens.

The Ingredients:

In order to show the rule of law breakdown farmers and farm workers need to
write affidavits containing irrefutable proof of how the law enforcement
agents have corrupted the law.  The courts need to be presented with
evidence for all to see that the rule of law breakdown is a planned and
coordinated exercise of a very sinister nature.

The ingredients that could be brought out include statements regarding the
following questions if they are applicable to you.

1. Was you farm fast-tracked by the authorities and/or invaders before
either it was listed or received a section 8?  If so, did you report this
to the police?  What were the RRB/CR numbers?  Did police react?  Was
anyone arrested or stopped from continuing?  If you did not report these
criminal matters to the police, why not?

2. Did invaders or authorities cause work stoppages and in what form did
they take, and what was your section 5 or 8 status at the time?  If so, did
you report this to the police?  What were the RRB/CR numbers?  Did police
react?  Was anyone arrested or stopped from continuing?  If you did not
report these criminal matters to the police, why not?

3. Did DDF tractors plough up your land or crops and what was your section
5 or 8 status at the time?  If so did you report this to the police?  What
were the RRB/CR numbers?  Did police react?  Was anyone arrested or stopped
from continuing?  If you did not report these criminal matters to the
police, why not?

4. Was maize or wheat confiscated by GMB that was intended for farm use?
If so, did you report this to the police?  What were the RRB/CR numbers?
Did police react?  Was anyone arrested or stopped from continuing?  If you
did not report these criminal matters to the police, why not?

5. Did CIO, police, army or others search your home and were these searches
authorised with a bonafide search warrant?  If so, did you report this to
the police?  What were the RRB/CR numbers?  Did police react?  Was anyone
arrested or stopped from continuing?  If you did not report these criminal
matters to the police, why not?

6. Were crops, livestock, prepared lands or other property destroyed,
"commandeered" or looted?  If so, did you report this to the police?  What
were the RRB/CR numbers?  Did police react?  Was anyone arrested or stopped
from continuing?  If you did not report these criminal matters to the
police, why not?

7. Was blackmail used to get you to sign land, crops, other property or SI6
payments over to invaders, authorities or others?  What were the details?
Did you report this to the police?  What were the RRB/CR numbers?  Did
police react?  Was anyone arrested or stopped from continuing?  If you did
not report these criminal matters to the police, why not?

8. Were you, your family or your workers assaulted by invaders or the
authorities?  If so, did you report this to the police?  What were the
RRB/CR numbers?  Did police react?  Was anyone arrested or stopped from
continuing?  If you did not report these criminal matters to the police,
why not?

9. Were you, your family or your workers "barricaded in" and if so what
were the circumstances?  If so, did you report this to the police?  What
were the RRB/CR numbers?  Did police react?  Was anyone arrested or stopped
from continuing?  If you did not report these criminal matters to the
police, why not?

10. Were you, your family or your workers arrested and/or imprisoned by the
authorities, and if so, what were the charges and were lawyers and next of
kin allowed access?

11. Did police evict you out of your home and stop you farming without a
court order?

12. Did the magistrate impose bail conditions that prevented you from
returning to your home and continuing your business?

13. Has your home been occupied?  If so, did you report this to the police?
What were the RRB/CR numbers?  Did police react?  Was anyone arrested or
stopped from continuing?  If you did not report these criminal matters to
the police, why not?

14. Were you prevented from collecting your assets on the farm after being
evicted?  If so, did you report this to the police?  What were the RRB/CR
numbers?  Did police react?  Was anyone arrested or stopped from
continuing?  If you did not report these criminal matters to the police,
why not?

15. Were prominent members of the regime involved in the breakdown of the
rule of law on your property?  Who are they, how have they been involved
and have you got evidence to show that they influenced the police or courts
unduly?

16. If police refused to react to lawlessness did you get court orders to
compel them to react and was it successful?  If you didn't, why didn't you?

If you have not got proper documentation to clearly bring out some of the
above points, start keeping a diary of events, police reports and other
evidence now!  You will need it in the future.

Many people have large amounts of documented evidence, which will bring out
some or even all the above points and possibly more.  Your affidavit does
not need to be a great document but as far as possible:

1. keep it concise and to the point and laid out as clearly as possible.
(Always ask yourself "is this showing how the police or courts failed to
uphold the law and my constitutional rights?"

2. be specific showing in all incidents how the law enforcement agents
(ZRP) or the courts have purposefully corrupted the law where this has been
the case and the actions you have taken to try to ensure the law is upheld.
Give dates, times, names of witnesses, names of perpetrators, etc wherever
possible.

Do not be daunted!  JAG can and will assist.  Play your part in creating a
future for Zimbabwe and for yourselves.  Write your affidavits and get them
in as soon as possible.

Leviticus 5:1 "If a person sins because he does not speak up when he hears
a public charge to testify regarding something he has seen or learned
about, he will be held responsible"

Think about it and get writing!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

All letters published on the open Letter Forum are the views and opinions
of the submitters, and do not represent the official viewpoint of Justice
for Agriculture.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justice for Agriculture mailing list
To subscribe/unsubscribe: Please write to
jag-list-admin@mango.zw
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Income Distribution And Policy

Financial Gazette (Harare)

EDITORIAL
May 7, 2003
Posted to the web May 8, 2003

Harare

With the exception of Zimbabwe, which continues to face a sustained decline
in output, global output has been rising, save for the temporary
recession-propelled set-back that started in 2000 and worsened by the
terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11 2001.

However accompanied by the increase in global output, there has been an
increase in income disparities in both developed and developing countries.
Resultantly, one of the most pressing issues facing policy makers today is
how to respond to this trend.

Although a survey carried out by Montak Ahluwalia in 1968 shows a "Gini
coefficient" of 0.62 for Zimbabwe, it is widely suspected that current
figures still show high inequalities in income.

The Gini coefficient is the most commonly used measure of income inequality,
with 0 representing perfect equality and 1 representing total inequality.
However, the real world situation falls between these two extremes. The
coefficient is the greatest in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa and
lowest in Eastern Europe; other regions fall between these two extremes.

Much of the debate about income distribution has centred on wage earnings.

For instance, in Zimbabwe an Earnings Survey done by PriceWaterHouseCoppers
for the period 1995 and 2000 commissioned by the Labour Ministry, EMCOZ and
ZCTU shows serious disparities between unskilled, skilled and managerial
employees.

As a result, the ZCTU has used this analysis as its basis for wage
negotiations. At a policy level, the government should look beyond wages if
it wants to address the general problem of income inequalities in Zimbabwe.

The distribution of wealth (and, by implication, capital income) is more
concentrated than labour income. For instance, in Africa and Latin America,
unequal ownership of land has been identified as an important factor in the
overall distribution of income. In fact, in recent years, there has been a
shift from labour to capital income in many countries.

In transition economies, this shift has been due primarily to the
privatisation of state-owned assets and the government's act of warehousing
some of the shares through a trust fund on behalf of the low-income groups
is a welcome income redistribution gesture.

Furthermore, pension funds and other financial institutions receive a
sizeable portion of capital income, and the share of capital income in total
household income typically changes over the life cycle of the individuals in
the household.

But is income inequality bad? The following are some of the reasons for
addressing income inequalities.

Some societies view equity as a worthy goal because of its moral
implications and its link with fairness and social justice. Policies that
promote equity can help, directly and indirectly, to reduce poverty.

Another issue is the increase in the awareness about the discrimination
suffered by certain groups on the basis of their gender, race or ethnic
origin, which has focused attention on the need to ensure that these groups
have access to government services and receives fair treatment in the labour
market.

Another factor is that many of today's policies will affect the welfare of
future generations, which raises the issue of inter-generational equity.

Another reason why governments are concerned with equity issues is that
policies that promote equity can boost social cohesion and reduce political
conflict.

Having discussed the rationale for the income distribution debate, the next
issue concerns the policy instruments that can be used to reduce income
inequalities.

Strategies are many and varied. In Africa and Latin American countries,
economic growth, viable balance of payments position and structural reforms
were seen as critical in achieving this goal.

In the transition period the strategy in these countries has included
policies aimed at helping groups likely to be negatively affected by the
reforms.

Such policies have included distributing shares of privatised enterprises,
adopting social policy instruments to protect vulnerable groups and erecting
social safety nets

Although this has been the case in Zimbabwe, the implementation of these
policies has been hampered by the lack of budgetary resources and lack of
holistic approach to the whole reform exercise especially on the public
sector for political reasons.

Fiscal policy is a government's most direct tool for redistributing income,
in both the short and long run. Nevertheless, the effect of redistributive
tax policies, especially in the face of globalisation, has been small.

It is widely accepted that policymakers should focus on developing a broadly
based, efficient and easily administered tax system with moderate marginal
rates.

An important subsidiary issue is how to distribute the burden of taxation so
the system is seen as fair and just. Achieving these various goals is
naturally complex and politically sensitive.

The expenditure side of the budget has offered better opportunities than the
tax side for redistributing income. The link between income distribution and
social spending is particularly strong, and public investment in human
capital can be an effective way to reduce income inequality in the longrun.

Outlays on health and education can improve the existing pattern of income
distribution, depending to a large extent on the allocation of expenditures
on various economic sectors.

Studies have shown that spending on basic health care and primary education
is far more effective in reaching the poor than spending on higher education
or hospital-based curative care; it reduces disparities in human capital
across income groups and can narrow income inequality in the long-run.

Studies have also shown that, in countries without some form of pooling of
health risks, serious illnesses are the single most important factor driving
families into poverty.

Governments can also indirectly affect income levels and distribution
through monetary policy and the overall stance of macroeconomic policy.

For example, high inflation tends to curtail economic growth and widen
income inequality.

Trade liberalisation, especially when it occurs in developing countries that
have had such restrictive trade policies as taxation of agricultural exports
and protective tariffs against imports may boost economic growth and lead to
more equitable conditions.

Governments can also promote equality of opportunity by adopting such
measures as deregulating the economy, setting up strong and accountable
institutions and a well-functioning judiciary, reducing opportunities for
corrupt practices.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

Heat Up Mugabe's Meltdown

Mail & Guardian (Johannesburg)

EDITORIAL
May 2, 2003
Posted to the web May 8, 2003

Johannesburg

In the course of Zimbabwe's painful road to total disintegration, the South
African authorities have consistently chanted the mantra that things are
getting better.

Over the past four years numerous delegations - some led by President Thabo
Mbeki and others by his ministers - have returned from Zimbabwe bearing
great tidings of change about to come.


Like latter-day Lord Chamberlains, our quiet diplomats have returned from
Harare with loads of promises that the land invasions would cease,
repression would stop, sensible policy options would be adopted and Zanu-PF
apparatchiks' venomous rhetoric would be toned down.

Last Sunday, a week ahead of a visit to Harare by himself and Nigeria's
Olusegun Obasanjo, Mbeki once again put out the line that Mugabe was set to
go and that theirs was a mission to help shape an exit plan. Barely 48 hours
later his assertion was repudiated as "wishful" and an "undemocratic insult"
by the Zimbabwean Information Minister, Jonathan Moyo. Mugabe will stay
until the end of his term in 2008, he insisted.

Next week's mission should not be another whitewash, another attempt to save
face for a tyrant whose time has come. The stakes are now just too high. An
indication of the desperate situation in which Zimbabwe now finds itself is
the news this week of inflation running at 228%, as is an imminent run on
the banks as citizens withdraw their funds in fear of a confrontation
between the state and its opponents.

That fear is not misplaced. After years of humbly pleading for foreign
salvation, Zimbabwe's pro-democracy activists have now turned up the tempo.
Spurred by rapidly deteriorating economic circumstances and the realisation
that they need to be primary drivers of change in their country, they have
recently organised two successful general strikes and announced a further
plan of rolling mass action this week.

They have risen to the challenge posed by Mbeki and other African leaders
earlier this year when they stated that the Zimbabwean people need to be at
the forefront of resolving the crisis in their country - a retort to calls
from outside Zimbabwe for more vocal diplomacy.

The response of the Zimbabwean authorities has been to intensify its
repression. The day after Mugabe made his watershed speech, his cops raided
the Movement for Democratic Change's office, again displaying the two-faced
nature of the Zimbabwean authorities. Tell your brother leaders one thing;
do another.

The intervention next week of continental leaders such as Mbeki and Obasanjo
is crucial. If indeed they do believe that change in Zimbabwe can only be
effected by Zimbabweans themselves, they have the responsibility to ensure
that the citizens have the political space to effect that change.

When they leave their respective capitals on Monday, they need to do so with
a singularity of mission: to convince Mugabe that it is not only in the
interests of his country but in the interests of our continent that he
vacate state house. The blueprint for his exit and the process that will
unfold thereafter already exists. It is now up to the leaders to exercise
the authority that Africa's multilateral institutions have bestowed on them.

Business must find its voice

There have long been complaints that organised business in South Africa is
too fragmented and poorly led to serve as a "social partner" in three-way
dealings with the government and labour.

A regular beef of the labour movement, the point has also been forcibly made
by National Economic Development and Labour Council chief Phillip Dexter.
The impression of disunity has been reinforced by the disintegration of the
South African Chamber of Business (Sacob) and, recently, by Business South
Africa's (BSA) tardiness in reaching consensus on a business platform for
the upcoming Growth and Development Summit.

The importance of Sacob, essentially representing small business, should not
be overstated. But it is worrying that BSA is so low-profile on policy
matters as to be almost invisible. Why, for example, did it have nothing to
say on the recent controversy over the role of business in apartheid
reparations?

Of course, there are limits to business unity. Different sectors have
different interests - exporters and the financial sector, for example,
differ fundamentally on the strength of the rand. And as BSA is itself made
up of large and disparate bodies like Sacob and the Chamber of Mines, the
mandating process is necessarily slow and cumbersome.

What is missing is confident, articulate and politically sophisticated
leadership of the kind that can be found in individual corporations, and the
recognition that business is a legitimate political player. Too often,
enterprise seems hamstrung by racial inhibitions and the fear of sticking
its head above the parapet.

The growth summit requires negotiators with clear mandates and a sense of
how, realistically, they can spur job creation. But it is unlikely to
produce more than consensus on matters like training and public works, and
should be seen as a beginning. In the longer term, a coherent business voice
will be needed to seal the large-scale co-determinist pacts that have
underpinned galloping growth in other countries.
Back to the Top
Back to Index

JAG PR Communique May 8, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPENSATION - THE FULL STORY

DATE: 15 MAY 2003
TIME: 10:00 TO 14:00
VENUE: ART FARM AUDITORIUM


SPEAKERS

ALAN BURL - CHAIRMAN

LOUIS BENNET - THE LAW AND COMPENSATION
Lawyer

ALAN HIGGINS - LAND AND IMPROVEMENTS
Valuator

ANDY LAING - CONSEQUENTIAL & OTHER LOSSES
Loss Assessors

DAVID SCOTT - CONSEQUENTIAL LOSSES & AUDITING
Chartered Accountant

KERRY KAY - FARM LABOUR & HUMAN RIGHTS
Counselor


ALL FARMERS INVITED TO ATTEND COMPENSATION MEETING 15TH MAY 2003

ART FARM

ALL FARMERS ARE INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING TO BE HELD AT ART FARM ON
COMPENSATION.

The Speakers will be professionals in their fields and addressing and
advising farmers on the various aspects of Compensation and the JAG Loss
Claim Document.

The meeting has been called with the support of all the farming
representative bodies in the best interests of the farmers.

SPEAKERS:

Alan Burl is a well-known farmer from the Marondera area and served as
president of the C.F.U. from 1988 till 1992. Allan has served with
distinction on various other committees and is a well respected
personality in the farming world. Allan will be the chairman of the
meeting.

Louis Bennet is a retired Lawyer with Kantor and Immermann. Louis will
address the meeting on the legal aspects of compensation and reflect on
the history of land tenure leading up to the present situation.

Allan Higgins is a valuator with Redfern Mullet and is standing in for
the chairman of the Valuators Consortium. Allan will address the issues
around valuation of Land and Improvements.

Andy Laing is a loss assessor from Bulawayo and runs his own firm
Losscon. Andy will deal with the issue of Consequential loss or
Disturbance loss or Other Losses. Andy was involved in the setting up of
the original Loss Document.

David Scott is currently a Senior Partner with Price Waterhouse Coopers.
He is also the current president of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in Zimbabwe. David will explain the role of accountants and
auditors and the procedures that will be implemented.

Kerry Kay is a well known farmers wife, HIV/AIDS Project Manager, and
Family Therapy and Traumatized Child Counselor.  Kerry will speak on the
necessity of dealing with the gross human rights violations perpetrated
against the farmer's, farm workers and all their families.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE JAG TEAM

Email: justice@telco.co.zw; justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Internet: www.justiceforagriculture.com

JAG Hotlines:
(011) 612 595 If you are in trouble or need advice,
    (011) 205 374
       (011) 863 354 please don't hesitate to contact us -
       (091) 317 264
    (011) 207 860 we're here to help!
(011) 431 068

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justice for Agriculture mailing list
To subscribe/unsubscribe: Please write to
jag-list-admin@mango.zw
Back to the Top
Back to Index