ZLHR Press Release – 12 Nov : Lawyers representing Deputy Agriculture Minister Designate Roy Bennett on Thursday 12 November 2009 requested High Court Judge, Justice Chinembiri Bhunu to recuse himself from presiding over the trial of the former Chimanimani legislator.
The application was made when it came to light that Justice Bhunu had in 2006 considered and dismissed a bail application filed by Peter Michael Hitschmann when he was facing similar charges to those in Bennett’s current case.
The State is alleging that Bennett was an accomplice of Hitschmann, who the State has listed amongst its witnesses.
In his judgment delivered in May 2006, Justice Bhunu stated that the charge which Hitschmann was facing was a serious one in that it constituted a threat to State security. The judge then denied bail after also finding that undoubtedly there is overwhelming evidence against” Hitschmann who at the time was facing charges of conspiracy to possess weapons for insurgency, banditry, sabotage or terrorism in contravention of section 10 of the Public Order and Security Act [Chapter 11:17]. Hitschmann was later acquitted of the charge by another High Court judge.
Bennett’s lawyer, Beatrice Mtetwa, who met Justice Bhunu in his chambers on Thursday together State prosecutors including Attorney General, Johannes Tomana said proceeding with the trial under Justice Bhunu would be prejudicial to Bennett since the Judge had already made comments that could be prejudicial to the former Chimanimani legislator’s case and which called into question his impartiality if he were to continue with the case.
Justice Bhunu will decide whether to recuse himself or not on Monday 16 November 2009.
Justice Bhunu ruled that; “Undoubtedly there is overwhelming evidence against the applicant. It is common cause that he was found in possession of the alleged offensive weaponry. He only disputes the classification of such weaponry. The State has classified the disputed weaponry using a government official, an armourer of more than two years experience whereas the applicant apart from the mere say so of his legal practitioner from the bar has laid no basis for challenging the State’s classification.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Lance Guma
12 November 2009
The
President of the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU), Lovemore
Matombo,
and four other unionists were set free on Thursday after a Victoria
Falls
magistrate threw out charges against them. The 5 were arrested on
Sunday for
holding consultative meetings with workers in the town. Police,
acting on
instructions from Mugabe's regime, claimed the leaders had
violated the
Public Order and Security Act (POSA) by holding the meetings
without police
permission. The magistrate however ruled that trade unions
were exempt from
seeking police authority for their meetings.
After being arrested, Matombo,
Michael Kandukutu, Percy Mncijo, Dumisani
Ncube and Nhawu Ndlovu were
detained overnight at Victoria Falls police
station. They were later
transferred to Hwange and kept there until their
court appearance. The state
continued to frustrate them and prolong their
detention by applying for
further remand on Tuesday. The arrests prompted
international condemnation
from trade unions worldwide. On Wednesday the
Australian Council of Trade
Unions, which represents 2 million workers,
added its voice in condemning
the arrests.
Meanwhile the state continues to oppose an application for a
refusal of
further remand put in by lawyers representing tortured MDC
Transport Manager
Pascal Gwezere. Two weeks ago state security agents
abducted Gwezere from
his home. His whereabouts were unknown for several
days until he was finally
taken to court and charged with breaking into a
military armoury and
undergoing military training in Uganda. Gwezere was
severely tortured after
his abduction and was refused medical treatment
until last Friday, when a
magistrate ordered he be treated.
On Wednesday
the state prosecutor Michael Mugabe (Robert Mugabe's nephew)
opposed the
defence application for a refusal of further remand, saying they
had laid
enough facts before the court to warrant remanding him further. His
lawyer,
Alec Muchadehama, however said; 'The court must take a practical
view of the
case. Could a man from the street go to Pomona Barracks and
steal arms? The
State must put its house in order, they must investigate if
there is
anything to investigate'. Magistrate Archie Wochiunga will make a
ruling on
the application on Monday next week.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Tichaona Sibanda
12 November
2009
There is rising tension in the Zimbabwe National Army after a number
of
senior officers allegedly died from torture whilst in military
detention.
The Herald reported on Wednesday that Major Maxwell Samudzi, a
48 year-old
deputy officer commanding One Engineers Support Regiment at
Pomona barracks
was found dead in his detention cell. The paper said Major
Samudzi committed
suicide, but army insiders contend he was tortured to
death.
Major Samudzi was described by colleagues as an excellent soldier
and a
brilliant darts player. He was one of many senior and junior officers
arrested by the military police after 20 AK47 rifles went missing from the
army garrison last month.
Another senior officer, a colonel
identified as Garira, presumably the
officer commanding Pomona barracks, is
reportedly very ill and close to
death, after also being tortured.
On
Thursday SW Radio Africa was told that three more soldiers, detained
under
allegations of stealing weapons from Pomona, died in the morning from
severe
torture. Two others were reported to be critical.
Two weeks ago, the
weekly Zimbabwean newspaper reported that at least 12
soldiers had died the
previous week, after brutal torture following the
weapons
disappearance.
For obvious reasons it is extremely difficult to verify
the deaths and
torture cases, but apparently furious army colleagues are
leaking the
information.
It is believed that Pomona barracks and
other barracks surrounding the
capital had been put under 'lockdown' by the
Presidential Guard to contain
the crackdown on fellow soldiers. A source
told us soldiers were not allowed
to leave Pomona barracks for a week, while
investigations were underway.
Survivors have been speaking of being tortured
by foreigners, from Angola
and the Congo.
Other soldiers still
detained have been named as Sungiso Musa, Darlington
Kanyingwe, Nyaruwata
Lawyers, Charles Muzondo, Dzingai T Chibutwaka, Stanley
Mvindwa, Chamunorwa
Chinyere, Cosmore Mangenda, Misheck Kangwa, Callistus
Mutero, David
Hamandishe and Farai Chitsiko.
Sox Chikohwero, a former war veteran and
Airforce of Zimbabwe officer, said
if the reports of torture and killings
are verified, the army stands accused
of committing serious crimes against
humanity.
'Normal procedure in the military is that when a crime is committed
investigations should follow. If there is a case to answer, the officer or
officers should be arraigned before a court marshal who will decide on the
matter. But what we see here in this case is murder of innocent servicemen,'
Chikohwero said.
Human rights advocacy group, Zimbabwe Democracy Now,
has called on the
United Nations and the international community to
intervene on the soldiers'
behalf. They expressed grave concern for the
safety of the soldiers and have
also called on the country's government to
ensure immediate access by
medical and legal practitioners to the detained
members of the army.
A retired army colonel who fought with ZANLA forces
in Mozambique, told us
Robert Mugabe has now lost control and the trust of
the army. He said if
weapons start missing from army barracks 'that's no
small matter.'
'Worse still if senior ranks of major and colonels are
implicated then there
is a real problem in the army and these are former
ZANLA forces,' the
retired army officer said. ZANLA was the armed wing of
ZANU PF during the
liberation war of the 1970's. Its former commander, the
late General Josiah
Tongogara, died in a mysterious car accident, a few days
before the end of
the war.
http://www.swradioafrica.com/
By Violet Gonda
12
November 2009
Much Masunda, the Chairman of Old Mutual Zimbabwe, has said
the insurance
giant is an 'institutional investor' and does not influence
the running of
companies that the group has invested in. Masunda, who is
also the Mayor of
Harare, was reacting to calls by South African pressure
groups for Old
Mutual to publicly withdraw its stake in Zimpapers, saying it
is wrong to
invest in a company which promotes hate speech.
But the
Chairman argued that the investment in Zimpapers goes back before
independence, when the company was known as the Rhodesian Printing and
Publishing Company.
South African refugee rights group, People
Against Suffering, Suppression,
Oppression and Poverty (PASSOP) and the
labour movement COSATU, have called
on the insurance giant to withdraw its
stake in Zimbabwe Newspapers Ltd, or
face a series of protest
actions.
A petition sent to Julian Roberts, Old Mutual CEO said: "The
newspapers
operated by the state through Zimbabwe Newspapers Ltd. (including
The
Herald, The Sunday Mail, Kwayedza, The Sunday News, The Chronicle, and
The
Manica Post) are among Zanu PF's most vital tools for retaining its
place as
one of the most infamously corrupt and brutal governments of the
last
decade."
But Masunda told SW Radio Africa on Thursday that the
company 'does not take
into account political considerations when investing
in a company and said
when the group initially made the investment in
Zimpapers, the politics in
the country and within the company were not what
they are now. He said if
Old Mutual was ever going to exit it would be for
reasons that are not
necessarily connected with the politics of the country
and company, but on
the basis that 'we are no longer getting the returns we
were expecting to
get."
He said: "There must be close to 83 companies
that are quoted on the
Zimbabwe Stock Exchange, and you will find that Old
Mutual is invested in
close to 76 of these companies and in most cases our
investments range from
15% to maybe 33% . In all these instances we don't
seek representation, we
are purely an institutional investor, investing on
the basis of financial
returns that we are going to get for our
policyholders or pensioners, on
whose behalf we manage the
pensions."
But the rights protestors accuse big businesses, such as Old
Mutual, of
having absolutely no ethics and because of this they actively
help
repressive regimes to remain in place. They say that many companies
today
care about nothing but making money.
Companies like Zimpapers
have, over the years, been used to spread dangerous
hate speech and have
been a very important part of the regime's repression,
helping trample down
any hope of freedom of expression.
PASSOP said Old Mutual was 'arming'
Mugabe's propaganda machinery, which is
the equivalent to 'loading bullets
into the guns that kill oppositional
voices in Zimbabwe."
Masunda
responded by saying while he takes heed of ethical considerations,
they are
currently 'operating in a market that has severe restrictions and
constraints' and threfore there is 'very little stock that is really worth
investing.'
http://www.thoughtleader.co.za
Michael
Trapido
Old Mutual
says its investments are dictated by profit and not political
considerations.
The insurance giant was reacting to a call to shed
its investment in the
Zimbabwean company that prints the Mugabe government's
propaganda
mouthpiece, The Herald newspaper.
"Our investments are
made for the benefit of our policyholders, meant to
meet needs and
expectations in terms of return and not contingent upon
political
consideration," OM Zimbabwe group chief executive Luke Ngwerume
said in a
statement on Wednesday." (Sapa)
Anyone who has been living in Southern
Africa for more than an hour would be
aware of the atrocities that have been
committed by the Zanu-PF and
President Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe in order to
cling to power.
One of the most important cogs in the machinery that they
employ in order to
achieve this is the Mugabe mouthpiece The
Herald.
It ensures that only the information and disinformation he wants
circulated
goes out to the people through the major newspaper of that
country.
Moreover the government censor, to a large degree, anyone who
dares to take
up an anti-government position.
This is not rocket
science and everyone knows it.
Accordingly Old Mutual is acutely aware
that this particular investment of
theirs is occasioning untold hardship on
the people of that country.
Personally I was shocked to hear that one of
our major corporates was
involved with a Mugabe propaganda
machine.
It is totally unacceptable.
What is worse is that they
try to justify the indefensible by saying that
they have a duty to their
shareholders to ensure that they retain profitable
assets and anyway it's an
investment dictated by money not politics.
What a load of
crap.
There are many corporate monsters that have tried singing the exact
same
song before and their conduct was equally disgusting. Let's look at one
example.
Zyklon-B was a commercial rodenticide and pesticide in
common use before
World War II. The active lethal ingredient in the product
is hydrogen
cyanide, which is deadly to warm-blooded animals in very low
concentrations,
and to insects in considerably higher
concentrations.
DEGESCH (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Schädlingsbekämpfung
mbH / German Vermin
Controlling Company), a subsidiary of IG Farben 4,
licensed two German
companies for the manufacture and distribution of
Zyklon-B: Tesch und
Stabenow (Testa) and Heerdt-Lingler
(Heli).
Zyklon-B was also manufactured in one of its forms in the United
States by
the American Cyanamid Company 5 under licence from the patent
holders, I.G.
Farben.
Hydrogen cyanide has historically been employed
for the destruction of
rodents and insect pests.
When, however, the
Nazis were looking for an effective method of gassing the
Jews and other
undesirables in their concentration camps they chose Zyklon-B
as the most
suitable for that purpose.
As a result huge orders went out to the
suppliers who naturally also
considered themselves indebted to their
shareholders and only interested in
profits and not politics.
Or
that's their version and they're sticking to it.
If the comparison makes
anyone uncomfortable it's meant to.
In Zimbabwe we have 5 million people
on the brink of starvation, political
murder, millions in exiles and on and
on.
The part that The Herald has played in promoting Mugabe and the
Zanu-PF can
never be underestimated. Despite millions starving, other
millions leaving
the country and their countrymen's terrible suffering they
simply keep
pumping out the "good word".
Old Mutual is an insurance
company which weighs up risk very carefully
before spending their money. In
order to do this they need information in
depth.
Accordingly if they
invested heavily in The Herald they know far more about
the horrendous
goings on in Zimbabwe than almost anyone else.
Yet they say they are not
concerned about politics merely profits.
I hope they've heard of Dormicum
or falling asleep every night must be a
bitch.
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, November 11th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
South African insurance giant, Old Mutual confirmed this week that it was a major shareholder in ZimPapers, the publishing group that produces some of Zimbabwe’s most vitriolic propaganda.
According to People Against Suffering, Suppression, Oppression and Poverty (PASSOP) – a South African refugee rights group – Old Mutual is the second largest shareholder in ZimPapers.
There are two clauses in Article 19 of the Global Political Agreement (GPA) that highlight the damaging effect an absence of press freedom has had on Zimbabweans lives:
(d) that steps be taken to ensure that the public media provides balanced and fair coverage to all political parties for their legitimate political activities.
(e) that the public and private media shall refrain from using abusive languagee that may incite hostility, political intolerance and ethnic hatred or that unfairly undermines political parties and other organisations. To this end, the inclusive government shall ensure that appropriate measures are taken to achieve this objective.
It is important that people outside Zimbabwe understand that the propaganda in Zimbabwe is not limited to merely putting one party’s political position over the other. The public media has been used to incite hatred, to vilify groups of people in Zimbabwe, to lie and try and generate hatred and anger towards people.It would be fair to say that much of the hatred and lack of tolerance demonstrated by some of the thugs in Zimbabwe can be linked in some part to a daily diet of hate-speak which, in the absence of a free press, is distilled in the minds of some as ‘the truth’.
The fact that the State has enacted some of the most repressive legislation in the world under AIPPA, reveals how much they understand that the way for their lies to flourish is to do all they can to squeeze out and silence the truth. Consequently, journalists have been arrested and threatened, newspaper banned, publishing offices were bombed in the early days.
Old Mutual’s support for ZimPapers has enabled the ZANU PF regime to get away with a heinous abuse of the human rights of free expression and free opinions in a country struggling to let freedom and democracy flourish, and to end violence.
PASSOP’s Braam Hanekom, a Zimbabwean born activist, does not mince his words on this point. Hannekom told SW Radio Africa on Wednesday that
Old Mutual was essentially ‘arming’ the state media, arguing “this is politically equivalent to putting bullets into the guns that kill opposition voices in Zimbabwe.” Hanekom has demanded that Old Mutual publicly withdraw its stake in Zimpapers, saying the group’s refusal to do so will point towards a business relationship based purely on corruption.
PASSOP have started a petition and they are calling on people to sign it. Please sign the petition and pass on the message to everyone you know to do the same!
The petition reads:
To: Julian Roberts, CEO, Old Mutual
Subject: Withdraw Support for Zimbabwe Newspapers Ltd. and the Mugabe Regime
Dear Mr. Roberts,
After being subjected to years of threats, intimidation, and violence by the dictatorial Mugabe regime, there are few outlets for independent press left in Zimbabwe. State-run newspapers like The Herald have filled the void that remains with reporting that is entirely and unashamedly one-sided. They are run by editorial staff that are so insulated from criticism that they no longer make any pretence of impartiality or respect for freedom of press. The newspapers operated by the state through Zimbabwe Newspapers Ltd. (including The Herald, The Sunday Mail, Kwayedza, The Sunday News, The Chronicle, and The Manica Post) are among Zanu PF’s most vital tools for retaining its place as one of the most infamously corrupt and brutal governments of the last decade.
It has come to our attention that Old Mutual is the second largest shareholder in Zimbabwe Newspapers Ltd. and is thus guilty of directly supporting the Mugabe regime. While the international community, appalled by the actions of the Zanu PF leadership, imposes sanctions on Zimbabwe, your company’s investment is essentially arming Mugabe’s propaganda machine, the equivalent to loading bullets into the guns that kill oppositional voices in Zimbabwe. In light of the detrimental effects of forced migration of recent years, we consider your interest in the company a direct attack on the impoverished people of not only Zimbabwe, but also those of South Africa. We are shocked and dismayed that a company with so much to lose, considering its international profile, has chosen to include the Mugabe regime’s propaganda newspapers in its investment portfolio.
We demand that Old Mutual publicly withdraw its stakes in Zimbabwe Newspapers Ltd. and openly apologise for an investment that we sincerely hope was an accidental oversight on your part. Should Old Mutual ignore this request, we will be forced to embark on protest actions, and plan to engage as many Old Mutual policy holders as possible.
Sincerely,
Thursday 12 November
2009
Herald reinvents fictitious divisions in the MDC
True to
fashion and tradition, The Herald today sought to reinvent their
tired
fiction of divisions within the MDC leadership over the issue of the
so-called sanctions.
The Herald has an agenda to create artificial
fissures in the people's
Movement in the hope that they can concoct another
October 12 in the MDC.
After October 12 2005, we built a stronger
Movement which overwhelmingly won
the election on 29 March 2008. We could
not have won that election if the
leadership had been as divided as The
Herald wishes could happen in this
great party.
The Herald has simply
sought to transfer factions and divisions from their
permanent home in Zanu
PF to the MDC. It is in Zanu PF where factions,
groups and divisions are the
order of the day. The Herald is currently
facing litigation over similar
persistent lies on the relationship between
the MDC President and the
Secretary-General, which lies they miraculously
hope might improve the
political fortunes of Zanu PF.
The MDC leadership and members, from the
President and Secretary-General, is
united and has a common position on the
issue of so-called sanctions which
in essence are restrictive measures
imposed on a cabal that thrived on
violence, murder and rampant human rights
abuses.
For the record, the MDC Secretary-General is the chief executor
and
implementor of party decisions and party policy. The unanimous party
position is that the so-called sanctions are sanctions imposed and created
solely by Zanu PF.
It is Zanu PF which has largely imposed sanctions
on Zimbabwe which they now
want the MDC to deal with. We are also aware that
The Herald's lies are
deliberate diversionary tactics to make some of us
lose focus from the theft
and kleptocracy that has eroded everyone's
confidence in the Reserve Bank of
Zimbabwe.
Hon Tendai
Biti
MDC Secretary-General
http://www.radiovop.com
Masvingo, November 12,
2009 - Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe has
revealed that only 680
students from the University of Zimbabwe will
graduate on Friday, out of the
nearly 3 000 students.
Mugabe, the UZ chancellor, annually
caps thousands of graduating
students from the oldest university in the
country. The university, like
many in the country, has seen a serious
deterioration of standards over the
years due to the political and economic
problems the country is facing. Most
universities have been rocked by
lecturer resignations, student strikes and
lack of water and sanitation as
well as food and accommodation problems.
On
Thursday, Mugabe who visited Copota School of the Blind here,
acknowledged
that Zimbabwe's universities were in a "mess". "I understand
that
universities and colleges are faced with serious problems. I was
shocked
...when University of Zimbabwe Vice Chancellor told me that out of
about
3000 students who are supposed to graduate under normal circumstances,
only
680 will manage to come to the graduation ceremony tomorrow
(Friday).
He blamed South Africa for Zimbabwe's
brain drain, saying it had
severely affected the smooth running of
instituitions of higher learning in
the country
"Colleges are in mess, I am aware that there is no water, food
lecturers and
a lot of other essential things," said Mugabe. "Our lecturers
are all in
down South."
Mugabe, however, said he was not interested
to disclose the state of
the inclusive government to the people."Today I am
not going to tell you
about the inclusive government or anything related to
that. Thus not my
business today."
Mugabe was
recently given 30 days by the Southern African Development
Community (SADC)
to comply with the Global Political Agreement (GPA) which
brought the new
unity government in place in February. The Movement for
Democratic Change
had protested to SADC that Zanu PF had failed to fulfill
agreements of the
GPA by failing to reverse among other issues, the
appointments of Reserve
Bank Governor, Gideon Gono and Attorney General,
Johannes
Tomana.
Mugabe was in Masvingo to donate two tractors, two
trucks, one Isuzu
single cab, 100 beds ,50 computers and one photocopying
machine to Copota
School For The Blind. He said he received the donations
from Mimosa mine in
Zvishavane and various
stakeholders.
He was accompanied by Minister of Higher
Education, who is also the
legislator for the area, Dr Stan
Mudenge.
Copota- which is run by Reformed Church in
Zimbabwe, is facing serious
economic problems and a lot of blind people are
dropping out of school as
they are running away from poor living conditions
at the school.
Sources at the school revealed that at times
the blind people could go
for the whole day without food. Currently the
school has also arranged for a
fundraising day scheduled for 28
November.
http://www.eyewitnessnews.co.za
Eyewitness News | 4 Hours
Ago
Zimbabwe's state-run media is reporting a South African scrap
metal company,
partly owned by Old Mutual PLC, is planning to mine in the
contested
Chiadzwa diamond fields.
Rights activists said the
fields were the site of a vicious government
clampdown last year but the
state denied this.
Zimbabwe's official Herald newspaper named the
company as the
Johannesburg-based New Reclamation Private Limited which is
part owned by
Old Mutual PLC.
The insurance giant has come
under fire this week for having shares in the
Herald - President Robert
Mugabe's mouthpiece.
The paper said Reclamation would mine its 50
percent-owned Grandwell
Holdings and would work in partnership with the
state's Zimbabwe Mining
Development Corporation.
The problem
is that the High Court has said the government does not have
legal title to
the claim.
Zimbabwe nearly got suspended from the Kimberly
Process over claims of
rights abuses in the diamond
fields.
Mutare residents said illegal diamond dealers, known as
Ngoda boys, were
back.
Source: AllAfrica Global Media Date: 08 Nov 2009 Guest column The decision to give Zimbabwe no more than a slap on the wrist for the human
rights abuses which its army has committed on the Marange alluvial diamond
fields in the south-east of the country seriously threatens the future of the
diamond industry's initiative to avert consumer boycotts of its gemstones. Last week the Kimberley Process -- the name by which the initiative is
popularly known -- convened a summit to try to convince Zimbabwe to suspend
itself from membership of the process after the country's soldiers allegedly
killed more than 200 miners in an operation to seize control of the Marange
fields late last year. But the summit's host government, Namibia -- unwilling to be perceived as a
'puppet of the West' -- would not stand up to the government of President Robert
Mugabe, even though the credibility of the Kimberley Process depended on it. So
the summit granted Zimbabwe eight months to sort itself out. Of course, speaking truth to power is difficult in the midst of intimidation.
However, if ever there was a time for boldness, surely it was now. The summit's
decision is laughable; it renders the Kimberley Process effectively toothless,
and is harrowing news for activists who have sought to protect citizens from
Mugabe's thugs. In the link between resource endowment and poor development performance --
popularly known as the 'resource curse' -- diamonds have been identified as
particularly problematic. Unlike diamonds mined from kimberlite pipes, such as
those in Botswana, the alluvial diamonds found by sifting through sand and
gravel are 'lootable' -- easily transportable and hidden, easily laundered and
thus susceptible to being traded for weapons by informal forces involved in
conflicts. The question of conflict diamonds and how to deal with them has become a
major issue in international politics in recent years. It has also entered the
popular conscience; aside from their appearance in a recent James Bond film, the
more robust production "Blood Diamond" --- the 2006 adventure movie starring
Leonardo DiCaprio -- has also provoked significant response. The Kimberley Process -- named after the South African diamond-mining city of
the same name, where the initiative was launched -- gained momentum quickly due
to early support from the United Nations and diamond industry heavyweights such
as the De Beers company and the World Diamond Council, representing traders,
miners and manufacturers. According to academics documenting the process, De Beers effectively admitted
to the presence of conflict diamonds, and then became actively involved in the
Kimberley Process, only because of the impact that negative publicity --
generated by non-governmental organisations such as Global Witness -- was having
on the demand for diamonds. Advocacy groups were juxtaposing diamonds --
promoted by the industry as a symbol of love -- against images of mutilation,
corruption and child soldiers, a mental association in the minds of consumers
that De Beers could scarcely afford. The sensitivity of demand to changes in consumer tastes is especially
important in determining the extent to which industries become involved in
governance initiatives like the Kimberley Process. The demand for diamonds is
far more sensitive to bad publicity than that for oil, for instance, since oil
is a necessity. This explains why the Kimberley Process has been more successful
than the similar initiative on oil and mining in general, the Extractive
Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). But what exactly is the Kimberley Process? It is a mechanism whereby member countries agree by consensus that no
diamonds are to be imported by any country unless they are packaged in
universally recognisable form and their country of origin verified. Any diamond
that lacks identification, or is identifiable as coming from a conflict zone, is
to be rejected. On July 31, 2003, 54 countries signed up to the process. About
70 countries, including Namibia and South Africa, are now signatories. Kimberley is unique in its ability both to bring a major multinational
corporation on board and to act upon empirical evidence about a resource curse
produced by academic researchers. Legitimate diamond sales have become almost
dependent on its success. However, the process is now in crisis, and Zimbabwe's
continued membership threatens the consensus on which the process relies for its
sustainability. Ross Harvey is a research assistant in the Governance of Africa's
Resources Programme at the South African Institute of International Affairs.
Ross Harvey
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written
by Radio VOP
Thursday, 12 November 2009 15:40
Chivi - Zimbabwe
soldiers have been deployed to rural areas to force
villagers to accept the
Kariba draft constitution as Zimbabwe's new
constitution, saying there was
nothing to discuss.
Chivi villagers were on Wednesday forced to abandon
their day-to-day
duties to attend the meetings called by soldiers from 4.1
infantry battalion
in Masvingo. Prior to the meetings suspected Zanu PF
youths were seen early
Wednesday making door to door visits instructing
villagers to attend the
meetings. "I was not aware that there were meetings
which were arranged, I
was shocked to see the youths in Zanu PF ward
structures coming at my home
saying all the people above 18 years were
supposed to go to the meeting,"
said a villager to Radio VOP. "I had no
option because we are very scared of
this military junta, I had to abandon
my programme and went to the meeting."
The villagers said they were
told by the soldiers that there was no
other draft constitution which was
better than the Kariba one. The Kariba
draft was crafted by the three
political parties who are signatory to the
Global Political Agreement (GPA)
in Zimbabwe. However the two Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC) factions
said there was need to take the draft to
the people for their inputs, a move
that has been resisted by Zanu PF.
Zimbabwe needs a new constitution before
it holds another election to take
over from the transition government that
was put in place in February
following the intervention of the Southern
African Development Community
(SADC). "When we arrived at the meeting, we
were surprised to discover that
there were soldiers, war veterans and Zanu
PF officials who all said we
should support the Kariba draft constitution if
the experts who are supposed
to come here for consultations arrive in our
area," said Curthibert
Chengeta.
MDC-T provincial chairman Wilstaff
Sitemere said he had since received
reports that villagers including his
supporters in Chivi were coerced by
soldiers to attend the meeting. "We
received the news today and we are not
happy with such behaviour at all.
Soldiers are now having tendencies of
victimizing innocent people in Chivi
and some parts of rural areas. We are
encouraging people to resist such
actions because the people have their
right to support their own draft,"
Munyaradzi Paul Mangwana, who is Chivi
Central legislator (Zanu PF) and also
co-chairman of the constitution making
process said he was not aware of the
move by soldiers in his constituency.
"I do not know what you are saying but
I am aware that all political parties
are already campaigning for people to
support any draft of their own
choice," said Mangwana.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk
A UN food summit aimed at helping the
one billion people worldwide suffering
from hunger has been declared a
failure a week before it has even begun.
By Nick Squires in
Rome
Published: 5:48PM GMT 12 Nov 2009
The leaked World Food Summit
draft declaration falls short of a UN goal of
eradicating hunger by 2025.
Instead, leaders are expected to to sign a
watered down declaration in Rome
next week that calls for vague increases in
aid for farmers in poor
countries but sets no targets or deadlines for
action.
Leaders are
expected to reaffirm their commitment to the UN's Millennium
Development
Goal of halving the number of hungry people by 2015 - a target
that is
unlikely to be reached.
The UN's Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO),
which is organising the
three day conference, had hoped to win a clear
promise from rich countries
to increase the amount they give each year in
agricultural aid from $7.9
billion (£4.8 billion) to $44 billion.
But
a final draft declaration instead made only a commitment to
"substantially
increase the share of official development assistance devoted
to agriculture
and food security based on country-led requests".
"The declaration is
just a rehash of old platitudes," said Francisco
Sarmento, food rights
coordinator for ActionAid.
Campaigners condemned the fact that the summit
will be attended by only one
G8 leader - Italy's prime minister, Silvio
Berlusconi, who is hosting the
gathering.
Britain will be represented
by two junior ministers, Mike Foster, from the
Department for International
Development and Jim Fitzpatrick, of the
Department for Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs.
The US, the world's biggest food aid donor, will send the
acting head of the
US Agency for International Development.
More than
60 world leaders are expected, including Pope Benedict XVI, Col
Gaddafi of
Libya, Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe and Hugo Chavez of
Venezuela.
"It's a tragedy that the world leaders are not going to
attend the summit,"
said Daniel Berman of Medecins Sans Frontières
.
Aid groups said the summit was a missed opportunity to tackle
malnutrition,
which kills a child every six seconds, despite the fact that
the world
produces a surplus of food. Cereal crops this year are expected to
be the
second largest ever, after a record harvest in 2008.
According
to FAO, the number of hungry people rose this year to 1.02 billion
people,
as a result of the global economic crisis, high food and fuel
prices,
drought and conflict.
"This scourge is not just a moral outrage and
economic absurdity, but also
represents a threat for our peace and
security," said FAO's director,
Jacques Diouf, who will embark on a 24 hour
fast on Saturday to show
solidarity with the world's hungry.
http://www.voanews.com
By Jonga Kandemiiri
Washington
12
November 2009
Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai Thursday urged members
of his Movement for
Democratic Change and all Zimbabweans to shun violence
and take a cue from
his relationship with President Robert Mugabe within the
national unity
government.
Tsvangirai was speaking at the Rusape,
Manicaland province, burial of the
late Makoni Central Member of Parliament
John Nyamande, 57, who died in a
weekend car accident.
Nyamande, who
defeated Justice Minister Patrick Chinamasa in the 2008
general elections,
had been living in England before returning to run for
the House. Sources
said Chinamasa and traditional leaders from Manicaland
attended the
funeral.
Nyamande leaves his wife and five children.
Tsvangirai
spokesman James Maridadi told VOA Studio 7 reporter Jonga
Kandemiiri that
the prime minister praised the late Nyamande's courage in
running in a rural
constituency such as Makoni Central which has long been a
hot spot for
political violence.
from VOA's Studio 7
http://www.ft.com/
By Richard Lapper at the Freda Rebecca Mine,
Zimbabwe
Published: November 12 2009 16:25 | Last updated: November 12
2009 16:25
After three years of silence, the din of dump trucks and
conveyor belts
fills the air at the Freda Rebecca mine 50 miles to the north
west of
Harare, Zimbabwe’s capital.
Struggling to make himself heard
as 30 tons of gold-bearing rock is unloaded
nearby, Kalaa Mpinga, chief
executive of Mwana Africa, the London-listed
mining company, admits it has
been tough convincing investors about the
chances of reviving mineral
production in one of Africa’s most politically
tormented
countries.
“Very few people believe it is possible after all these
years ... to restart
mining,” says Mr Mpinga, who founded the company in
2003 and took it public
two years later.
“I’d go to roadshows and people
would say, where are you going to get the
people from?”
Mwana, which
also owns mining assets in the Democratic Republic of Congo,
South Africa
and Angola, is seeking to prove the doubters wrong, with its
gold-mining
operations part of a broader but as yet embryonic Zimbabwean
revival.
Forced to close its operations in the country almost
entirely two years ago
after hyperinflation and punitive exchange controls
made it impossible to
mine profitably, Mwana has been encouraged by the
decision to abandon the
local currency in favour of the dollar and the rand
and free up exchange
controls.
With gold prices this week reaching
record levels of more than $1,100 per
ounce, the company, whose costs are
about $650 per ounce, expects handsome
returns. Mr Mpinga is also planning
to bring two nickel mines – in which
Mwana has a majority stake – back into
production next year.
A handful of other mining companies are also back
in business, and although
gold output is well short of the peak of 28 tons
reached in 1998 it is
creeping up. David Murangari, a former president of
the mining chamber who
now works with Mr Mpinga, estimates it will rise by
two thirds to five tons
this year and could reach 15 tons in 2010.
Mr
Mpinga, who learned his trade with Anglo American in the early 1990s,
says
that, despite the difficulties of recent years, Zimbabwe’s physical and
human infrastructure remains relatively advanced, especially compared with
other high-risk areas such as his native Congo. “Here the issue is not a
building issue, it is rehabilitating existing infrastructure ,” he
says.
Zimbabwe retains considerable mining talent. Mr Mpinga says there
is no
shortage of geologists and engineers seeking to join the company and
that he
has received CVs from professional Zimbabweans from as far away as
Papua New
Guinea who are interested in returning.
Although political
and human rights concerns remain, business people note
that Zimbabwe has
made modest progress on economic issues. Mwana says that
the coalition
government – formed after President Robert Mugabe and Morgan
Tsvangirai, his
political foe, agreed to share power in February – has been
receptive to
some investor concerns and that government departments are
becoming more
responsive.
Recently, for example, the state-owned electricity company
finally provided
new electricity connections for the Freda Rebecca
mine.
Sustaining these advances could be problematic. Mwana last week
secured a
$10m (€6.6m, £6m) loan from Industrial Development Corporation, a
South
African state-owned development bank, that will allow it to double
output at
Freda Rebecca. But commercial bank lending – local or
international – is
unlikely to be available for some time.
And Mwana
could have a difficult job persuading would-be investors that
political
risks are under control. To make nickel production viable at its
majority-owned mines at Bindura, Mwana will need to cut its 2,700-strong
workforce by about 40 per cent. In an area where Mr Mugabe’s Zanu-PF has had
strong support, that might not be easy.
Mr Mugabe’s party retains a
capacity for unpleasant surprises. Ministers
from the Movement for
Democratic Change said last week the government would
introduce an
investment law under which foreign investors would be under no
obligation to
cede control of operations to local black empowerment groups.
Days later
local press reported on draft legislation from Zanu-PF that
proposes just
the opposite.
http://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk
Written by Munosvikepi
Chakonera
Thursday, 12 November 2009 06:54
HARARE - Zimbabwe's
civil servants who have returned from the Diaspora
have complained bitterly
about the failure of the government to pay
competitive salaries.
Since February of this year, average salaries have fallen consistently
below
the poverty-datum line and the civil servants' hopes are pinned on
annual
bonuses to enable them to survive the festive season. Health workers
in
hospitals across the country have been getting additional money from
donor
agencies as incentives to motivate them to continue working in a
country
where threats of cholera outbreaks and other water-borne diseases
haunt
citizens.
Teacher representative unions, The Zimbabwe Teachers'
Association
(Zimta), and the Progressive Teachers' Union (PTUZ) have both
said that
their members are frustrated. "We have held several meetings with
the
minister of education and other organisations like UNICEF to try and
come up
with competitive salaries for teachers, but currently the government
is
broke and has not accessed any lines of credit from international
financiers. However, it is our hope that those teachers who have rejoined
the profession will finally get paid for all the months they have gone
without pay and that all teachers get their annual bonuses as has been the
norm in the previous years. Currently we have not got any word from the
ministry about the bonuses," said Raymond Majongwe, secretary-general of
PTUZ.
Salaries are still very low that some workers in the ministry
of home
affairs have resorted to corrupt measures in order to make money;
policemen
are swindling motorists at roadblocks and immigration officers
charge high
prices for passports and emergency travel documents. The
provision of annual
bonuses will go along way in solving the problems of the
restive civil
service workforce.
www.nationalvision.wordpress.com
In spite of Zimbabwe’s economic
desperation, China’s deals have to be
considered with extreme caution,
notwithstanding China’s rising economic
clout. It is particularly true
especially considering China’s heart-rending
role in propping up the
genocidal regime of Omar al-Bashir, the despotic
Sudanese President
currently on the run after a warrant of arrest was issued
by the
International Criminal Court (ICC) this year.
Al-Bashir, a mass murderer who
has been in power for 20 years through a 1989
military coup, is wanted by
the Hague for crimes against humanity. According
to the United Nations, he
is personally responsible for the Darfur genocide
that killed up to 300 000
non-Arabs while displacing 2.7 million. But
al-Bashir insists that there
were ‘only’ 10 000 deaths.
Sudan is sustained by China militarily,
economically and politically. China
is also the leading trading partner for
Sudan and has numerous business ties
with government officials there.
China’s interests in Sudan are vast
especially considering the fact that it
has multi-billion-dollar oil
contracts and arms deals. In February 2007, Hu
Jintao’s state visit to Sudan
culminated in the cancellation of the
country’s multi-million dollar debt.
As new deals were signed in 1997, China
swiftly built al-Bashir’s new
presidential palace, a similar corrupting gift
extended to Robert Mugabe in
the recent past. As reported by The Herald,
while in China this week,
Mugabe paid a truly stunning tribute to China, yet
politically fashionable
for him saying, "China has been able to develop its
economy without
plundering other countries and the Chinese economic miracle
is indeed a
source of pride and inspiration. I would like to express my
gratitude…”
Sudan is already under sanctions but with the underhand tactics
of countries
such as China, its kleptocracy has been immensely enriched. For
the same
reason, it is worrisome that Mugabe was quick to celebrate the
newfound
neo-colonialist role of China in Africa. Any deals that come from
Zanu PF’s
traditional allies from the “East” without careful thought, might
mean that
Zimbabwe pays dearly for its democratization efforts. Money from
Asia means
a lot in terms of advancing Zanu PF’s game plan.
Sudan is
touted as one Africa’s potentially richest nations yet the
incongruity is
that it is also one of the poorest, with nothing to show for
the
multi-billion dollars supposedly being poured by China. There is an
oxymoron
here: Sudan is being impoverished. Similarly, as the economic
crisis
persists, Mugabe must not be allowed to continue mortgaging the
country’s
mineral wealth and land in exchange for a few US dollars enough to
sponsor
their private interests as they did in the past. The people of
Zimbabwe must
demand a full disclosure of China’s intentions.
The bottom-line is that China
has been the distinguished beneficiary of
African’s chaos such as in
Zimbabwe and Sudan by providing huge military
hardware, bribes and
sweetheart deals that barter a few US dollars for vast
national wealth.
Before the inclusive government, barter trade was more
visible in Zimbabwe
(for mines, tractors, military supplies and properties)
being a country
hard-hit by a severe foreign currency crisis. Unconfirmed
reports also
indicate that Zimbabwe’s ongoing blood diamonds in Manicaland
have the
Chinese as sworn underwriters.
By supplying weapons of war to woeful Zimbabwe
(through Angola) soon after
the stolen elections of March 2008, China proved
that it was extending its
unscrupulous underhand condoning dictatorships in
Africa. China fatally
compromised Zimbabwe’s democratic process. It is
China’s ugly track record
of human rights violations that worries many
people. To put it mildly, just
like Mugabe and his minions, China is less
concerned about human rights. Let
alone Africa’s tranquility.
Other than
flooding downtown Harare with plastic toys and “sadza lajuro”
food cafes,
China will only serve to under-develop Africa further if African
governments continue to give the Chinese blank cheques. (Otherwise
Zimbabweans may need to use a new form of “junta tactic” at some stage after
Mugabe is long gone, to repossess the land and the mines that are freely
being donated to the Chinese)
Other than plundering national wealth and
looting alongside Africa’s
kleptocrats, the advent of China comes with no
strings attached. What makes
it an exceptionally attractive package for
Africa’s strongmen is that China’s
deals are silent about the rule of law or
respect for human rights as
preconditions for doing business. It’s
incontestible; China is the biggest
beneficiary of the dictatorships of
Africa. Similarly unregulated Chinese
investments will do more harm than
good for Zimbabwe. It will just be money
without
logic!
=====================================================
For feedback
email: nvinstitute@aol.com
http://www.economist.com
Sep 10th 2009 | CAPE TOWN
From The Economist
print edition
African leaders fail yet again to squeeze Zimbabwe's
recalcitrant president
MORGAN TSVANGIRAI, Zimbabwe's prime minister,
is putting a brave face on his
latest setback. But he must feel badly let
down, once more, by the Southern
African Development Community (SADC). At a
summit meeting of its 15 leaders,
the regional club failed to criticise
President Robert Mugabe for his
refusal to honour the power-sharing deal it
helped broker a year ago.
Instead, Mr Tsvangirai was fobbed off with the
promise that a committee of
three SADC members would eventually "review" the
unity government that took
office in February. Mr Mugabe is
smirking.
Jacob Zuma's election as South Africa's president in May had
brought hope of
a tougher stance towards Zimbabwe by SADC's most powerful
country after
years of ineffectual "quiet diplomacy" by its former
president, Thabo Mbeki.
Mr Tsvangirai's expectations rose after he met Mr
Zuma in Johannesburg last
month. South Africa's ruling African National
Congress announced that Mr
Zuma would be "more vocal" than his predecessors
in criticising the
"adolescent" and "deviant" behaviour of Mr Mugabe's
Zanu-PF party.
During a visit to Zimbabwe at the end of August,
ostensibly to open an
agricultural show but in truth to knock a few heads
together ahead of the
SADC summit, Mr Zuma pointedly stressed the importance
of good governance
and respect for human rights everywhere in Africa, before
calling on the
parties to Zimbabwe's power-sharing deal to honour their
commitments and
ensure its full implementation. In particular, he said
Zimbabwe must, as a
priority, meet the West's conditions for resuming
development aid. No
African leader had dared say that before.
The
Americans and the European Union insist that Mr Mugabe's lot must stop
abducting, arresting and killing supporters of Mr Tsvangirai's Movement for
Democratic Change (MDC); cease the invasions of white-owned farms; replace
the central-bank governor, Gideon Gono, and the attorney-general, Johannes
Tomana; appoint new provincial governors; and free the media (see article).
And they must help draft a new constitution leading to fair elections
within, it is hoped, 18 months.
To stave off the humiliation of being
censured by his SADC peers, Mr Mugabe
has begun to make a few concessions.
In the past few weeks he announced
steps to end the state's monopoly over
the media, and lifted a ban on
correspondents from international
broadcasters such as CNN and the BBC. And
he has convened the National
Security Council, on which Mr Tsvangirai has a
seat and which is meant to
replace Mr Mugabe's feared Joint Operations
Command. The top military brass
have even begun to salute Mr Tsvangirai,
which they had sworn never to
do.
Yet, with Mr Mugabe still holding the main levers of power, violence
and
intimidation have not abated. No fewer than 15 MDC MPs have been
arrested on
dubious charges since the unity government took office. More
white farmers
have been murdered and 170 face prosecution for refusing to
leave their
land. A SADC tribunal ruled last year that the seizures were
illegal, but
Zimbabwe's government now refuses to recognise the tribunal's
legitimacy.
Meanwhile, Zanu-PF is doing its utmost to delay drafting a
new constitution
and to prevent fresh elections, which it knows it is
virtually certain to
lose. Now, with SADC apparently unwilling to squeeze Mr
Mugabe, the old man
and his friends can breathe more easily for a while
yet.
http://www.economist.com
Nov 12th 2009 | JOHANNESBURG
From The Economist
print edition
Setting a deadline for Zimbabwe's politicians to settle
their differences
AT LAST the Southern African Development Community
(SADC), an influential
club of 15 countries that has overseen the regional
diplomacy intended to
solve Zimbabwe's troubles, is showing signs that it
may be prepared to
squeeze President Robert Mugabe a bit harder. As the
supposed guarantor of a
power-sharing pact between Mr Mugabe and Morgan
Tsvangirai, the former
opposition leader, SADC has-after months of
dithering-ordered all
"outstanding issues" to be settled by December 5th. As
a result, Mr
Tsvangirai has agreed to end a three-week boycott of the unity
government by
members of his Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC).
Ever since the coalition government was set up in February, Mr
Mugabe has
flouted most of the pact's main provisions with impunity. In some
respects,
matters have been getting worse. The persecution and arrest of
political
opponents, trade unionists and student leaders have increased. So
has
violence against the dwindling band of white farmers who refuse to be
chased
off their property. Broadcasting and the daily press, still firmly in
the
hands of Mr Mugabe's Zanu-PF, smear Mr Tsvangirai and the MDC
incessantly,
while independent newspapers have yet to be allowed to start
printing again.
A new national security council, representing all
parties in the unity
government as the pact decrees, has met briefly just
once in place of the
feared Joint Operations Command, which has long
organised Zanu-PF thuggery.
And Roy Bennett, Mr Tsvangirai's nominee as
deputy agriculture minister, on
trial on trumped-up terrorism charges that
carry the death penalty, has
still not been sworn in.
On paper, the
communiqué issued on November 5th by SADC's "troika" of
Mozambique,
Swaziland and Zambia, looks as bland and ineffectual as the
group's previous
statements on Zimbabwe. There was still no hint of censure
of Mr
Mugabe.
Yet those who attended the meeting in Mozambique's capital,
Maputo, say the
mood was distinctly different. For the first time, they
detected a real
sense of urgency. Mr Mugabe attended along with Mr
Tsvangirai, but only in
his capacity as leader of ZANU-PF, not as Zimbabwe's
head of state: a
humiliating come-down. It was clear this time that most of
the blame for
non-compliance with the "spirit and the letter" of the
power-sharing pact
was laid at Mr Mugabe's door. "We had the clear
impression that he was being
brought to book," said an MDC
official.
Mr Tsvangirai sounds chuffed. He is particularly pleased that
SADC has
appointed South Africa's president, Jacob Zuma, formally to
"facilitate"
Zimbabwe's power-sharing in place of his predecessor, Thabo
Mbeki, whom the
MDC loathed for what it considered his gross bias in Mr
Mugabe's favour. Mr
Zuma, who has sounded more sympathetic to Mr Tsvangirai,
is expected to
visit Zimbabwe before the end of the month to review
progress.
No one expects all the outstanding issues to be settled by the
deadline of
December 5th. But for once Mr Mugabe is under pressure to make
proper
concessions. His peers have never given him so plain a deadline
before.
Recently the director-general of South Africa's foreign ministry
said that
regional leaders were fearful that the situation in Zimbabwe could
"get out
of hand". At least 2m Zimbabweans, many of them destitute, have
poured into
neighbouring countries, especially South
Africa.
Co-operate or collapse
At the very least, SADC's leaders now
expect Mr Mugabe to meet some of Mr
Tsvangirai's demands, such as the
appointment of MDC people to provincial
governorships and the prompt
swearing-in of Mr Bennett as deputy agriculture
minister. But if Mr Mugabe
refuses to co-operate, the MDC may decide,
perhaps even with SADC's
approval, to pull out of the government altogether,
leading to its
collapse.
If that happened, calls for fresh elections would intensify,
probably with
backing from at least some of SADC's leaders. ZANU-PF is keen
to avoid such
an eventuality, knowing that it would almost certainly lose,
unless the poll
was as blatantly rigged as it has been in every election
since 2000. A
recent survey suggested that Mr Mugabe's party, in sole power
for 28 of the
past 29 years, would get less than 10% of the vote.