This story was on the front page of The Washington
Times this morning,Nov.
26
-----------------------------------------------------------
MUGABE REGIME LIKENS JOURNALISTS TO TERRORISTS
Michael Hartnack
ASSOCIATED
PRESS
-----------------------------------------------------------
HARARE,
Zimbabwe -Correspondents for foreign media who
reported indiscriminate
beatings of whites a week ago will
be treated as terrorists, a presidential
spokesman warned
yesterday.
The statement appeared in the state-owned
Herald newspaper
on the same day a European Union delegation said
embattled
President Robert Mugabe heatedly rejected EU demands
for
international observers at elections that are supposed to be
held by
early next year.
Mr. Mugabe's government is being strongly criticized
over
alleged human rights abuses and a crackdown on the
opposition that
have escalated since ruling party militants
began violent occupations of
white-owned farms in March
2000. The 15-nation EU is considering
sanctions.
With the economy near collapse, Mr. Mugabe's popularity
has
plummeted, and Western diplomats and political analysts
have
speculated he is trying to engineer a chaotic situation that
would
allow him to declare a state of emergency and toughen
his crackdown before
elections.
The presidential spokesman, who was not identified by
name,
said a protest letter from U.S. Ambassador Joseph Sullivan
about
Nov. 16 violence in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's second
biggest city, was "likely to
trigger a diplomatic furor." He
said it was based on "gross and obscene
misrepresentation of
facts by the so-called foreign
correspondents."
Western diplomats confirmed that ruling party
militants
assaulted whites and vendors of independent newspapers
in
Bulawayo. One German aid worker was beaten in front of his
children,
they said.
Witnesses reported that militants threw firebombs at
the
offices of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change in
downtown
Bulawayo and then stoned fire trucks when they
arrived. State media said the
MDC burned its own offices,
allegedly to destroy evidence of involvement in
the murder
of a militant leader.
The presidential spokesman's criticism
singled out
journalists from The Associated Press, Business Day of
South
Africa and the British newspapers The Times, Guardian,
Daily
Telegraph and The Independent.
"It is now an open secret that these
reporters are not only
distorting the facts but are assisting terrorists who
stand
accused in our courts of law of abduction, torture and
murder, by
covering up and misrepresenting the brutal deeds
of terrorists," the
spokesman was quoted as saying.
"As for the correspondents, we would like
them to know that
we agree with U.S. President Bush that anyone who in any
way
finances, harbors or defends terrorists is himself a
terrorist. We,
too, will not make any difference between
terrorists and their friends and
supporters."
The spokesman also contended that independent media
in
Zimbabwe had tried to intimidate journalists who work
for
state-controlled newspapers and broadcasters. "This kind of
media
terrorism will not be tolerated," the spokesman was
quoted as
saying.
Journalists for independent media have been arrested and
beaten by
ruling party militants. Foreign journalists have
been harassed, threatened,
beaten and arrested by militants
and security forces.
The U.S. Embassy had
no comment on the spokesman's remarks
or on whether the ambassador had sent a
protest letter.
However, a U.S. official, speaking on condition
of
anonymity, said a protest note had been delivered by U.S.
officials in
Washington to Zimbabwe's embassy there.
"AP's coverage of the violence in
Zimbabwe and our coverage
of moves by the government against political
opponents and
the press have been consistently factual, unbiased
and
fair," AP spokeswoman Kelly Smith Tunney said in New York.
Belgian
Foreign Minister Louis Michel, head of the EU
delegation, described the
90-minute meeting with Mr. Mugabe
on yesterday as stormy.
He said EU
officials expressed concerns over the occupation
of white-owned farms,
attacks on press freedoms and the
decision to ban international election
monitors. Mr.
Mugabe's reaction to monitors was particularly strong,
he
said.
"We just put on the table the issue and there was a
very
brutal reaction," Mr. Michel said. "We really didn't have
an
opportunity to have a constructive exchange of views."
There was no
immediate comment from the government about the
meeting.
Guardian
Mugabe will have to kill me to shut me up
Basildon Peta
25
November 2001
Foreign Secretary Jack Straw yesterday condemned last week's
assertion by
the government of Zimbabwe that six Harare-based journalists who
have
written pieces critical of president Robert Mugabe – including myself –
are
guilty of "assisting terrorism".
The others were Jan Raath of The
Times, Peta Thornycroft of the Telegraph,
Andrew Meldrum of the Guardian,
Angus Shaw of the Associated Press and
Dumisani Muleya, of South Africa's
Business Day.
Mr Straw said he was "profoundly concerned" at the reports.
Assisting
terrorism carries the death penalty under Zimbabwean
law.
"This is in clear breach of the Abuja Agreement, which explicitly
referred
to Zimbabwe's commitment to freedom of expression," said Mr Straw.
"The
British High Commission in Harare is making urgent representations to
the
government of Zimbabwe to seek assurances that independent journalists
will
be able to report freely and without sanction."
Mr Straw said he
would be talking to EU and Commonwealth colleagues "to
consider how else we
should respond" and would make a further statement in
the Commons on
Tuesday.
Last week Jonathan Moyo, Mr Mugabe's Minister of Information,
likened the
president to George Bush. "We, too, will not make any difference
between
terrorists and their friends or supporters," he said. Such threats
can
hardly be ignored, given that Mr Mugabe has introduced a public order
and
security bill which, he says, is aimed at combating terrorism. It
prescribes
stiff penalties for people who publish information considered
offensive, and
life sentences for people accused of espionage, terrorism,
sabotage and
other crimes.
Personally, I take great exception to being
labelled a "terrorist'' by a
government now considered among the worst human
rights violators in the
world.
Three weeks ago a Mugabe loyalist, Cain
Nkala, was abducted from his home
near Bulawayo by persons unknown and
murdered. Before the courts have tried
anyone for the crime, Mugabe and his
ministers have already convicted the
opposition Movement for Democratic
Change (MDC).
I don't condone murder. But while Mugabe has found an
opportunity in Nkala's
death to justify introducing draconian measures, he
has never said a word
about the hundreds killed by his own supporters since
last year.
I'm not an opponent of Mr Mugabe, merely a journalist prepared
to report the
truth as it unfolds. I will continue doing that, despite all
the threats. If
Mr Mugabe and his ministers want my blood, they can have it.
I will be back
at my desk tomorrow.
Guardian
Britain Protests Mugabe Warning
Saturday November 24,
2001 11:30 PM
LONDON (AP) - Britain demanded Saturday that Zimbabwe
refrain from
interfering with the work of independent journalists, after the
government
there accused some reporters of supporting terrorists.
``I
am profoundly concerned by the reports of comments made by the
Zimbabwe
government spokesman in which he implied that foreign and local
journalists
were assisting terrorism,'' Foreign Secretary Jack Straw
said.
``The British High Commission in Harare is making urgent
representations to
the government of Zimbabwe to seek assurances that
independent journalists
will continue to be able to report freely and without
censorship,'' Straw
said.
On Friday, a spokesman for President Robert
Mugabe said correspondents for
foreign media who reported indiscriminate
beatings of whites in Zimbabwe a
week ago would be treated as
terrorists.
In a statement that appeared in The Herald, a state-owned
newspaper, the
spokesman, who was not identified, singled out journalists
from The
Associated Press, Business Day of South Africa and the British
newspapers
The Times, The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph and The
Independent.
On Saturday, The Herald reported that Information Minister
Jonathan Moyo
rejected an appeal from the editors of The Guardian asking that
their
correspondent be allowed to report freely in Zimbabwe.
The
journalists warned Friday ``have purposely been used as instruments of
the
opposition by demonizing Zimbabwe, its government and people,'' the
newspaper
quoted Moyo as saying.
The Irish Times
Britain threatens action over Zimbabwe
abuses
Last updated: 24-11-01, 21:28
British Foreign
Secretary Mr Jack Straw has threatened diplomatic action
against Zimbabwe
following a warning by the Britain’s foreign office not to
harass
journalists.
The British High Commission lodged an official protest over
the threat to
journalists who reported the indiscriminate beatings of
whites.
A spokesman for President Robert Mugabe was quoted in a
state-controlled
newspaper as calling six journalists "terrorists" after they
reported on
last week's political violence in Zimbabwe's second city,
Bulawayo.
Mr Straw said he would also be consulting EU and Commonwealth
colleagues on
further action against Robert Mugabe's regime.
Mr
Mugabe's government has been strongly criticised over human rights abuses
and
militants in his ruling party were reportedly involved in the attack a
week
ago.
Whites were beaten and offices of the opposition party, the Movement
for
Democratic Change, were set on fire last week.
"It is now an open
secret that these reporters are not only distorting the
facts but are
assisting terrorists who stand accused in our courts of law of
abduction,
torture and murder," an anonymous spokesman for President
Mugabe
said.
Correspondents with the Guardian, Daily Telegraph, Times
and Independent
newspapers were named and these papers have urged the British
Government to
intervene.
Journalists for independent media have been
arrested, harassed, threatened
and beaten by militants and President Robert
Mugabe’s security forces.
(The Times, London)
Jan Raath in Harare
Mugabe stuns EU
officials with vote snub
THREE of the European Union's most senior
officials left Harare yesterday
shocked after a confrontation with President
Mugabe, who made clear that he
would not consider EU insistence on minimum
international norms for next
year's presidential elections.
Louis
Michel, the Belgian Foreign Minister, who led the EU delegation, said
he had
received "a brutal reaction" from Mr Mugabe when they expressed their
concern
about the surge of violence and repression in recent weeks as the
country
moves towards elections due within four months.
Mr Michel said: "We
just put on the table the issues. Clearly, unless the
elections have complied
with certain minimum standards, it will be very
difficult, not to say
impossible, for them to be recognised by the EU.
"We really did not
have an opportunity to have a constructive exchange of
views," he said,
adding: "We have to admit it (the EU's relationship with
Zimbabwe) is at a
critical point."
Diplomatic sources said that Mr Michel, Chris
Patten, External Affairs
Commissioner and Javier Solana, the EU's foreign
policy chief, were visibly
angry after their 90-minute meeting with Mr
Mugabe.
Mr Patten said Mugabe determined to win a fourth presidential
term, "did not
indicate he would welcome European observers" to the
elections.
Meanwhile Mugabe's government has warned that foreign
correspondents in
Zimbabwe who reported indiscriminate beatings of whites a
week ago would be
treated as terrorists. A presidential spokesman singled out
journalists from
several British newspapers. "It is now an open secret these
reporters are
not only distorting the facts but are assisting terrorists
accused of
murder," he added.
Zimbabwe's Mugabe Rejects EU Demands
By MICHAEL HARTNACK, Associated Press writer
HARARE, Zimbabwe (AP) - Correspondents for foreign media who reported
indiscriminate beatings of whites a week ago will be treated as
terrorists, a presidential spokesman warned Friday.
The statement appeared in the state-owned Herald newspaper on the same day a
European Union (news
- web
sites) delegation said embattled President Robert Mugabe heatedly rejected
EU demands for international observers at elections that are supposed to be held
by early next year.
Mugabe's government is being strongly criticized over alleged human rights
abuses and a crackdown on the opposition that have escalated since ruling party
militants began violent occupations of white-owned farms in March 2000. The
15-nation EU is considering sanctions.
With the economy near collapse, Mugabe's popularity has plummeted, and
Western diplomats and political analysts have speculated he is trying to
engineer a chaotic situation that would allow him to declare a state of
emergency and toughen his crackdown before elections.
The presidential spokesman, who was not identified by name, said a protest
letter from U.S. Ambassador Joseph Sullivan about Nov. 16 violence in Bulawayo,
Zimbabwe's second biggest city, was ``likely to trigger a diplomatic furor.'' He
said it was based on ``gross and obscene misrepresentation of facts by the
so-called foreign correspondents.''
Western diplomats confirmed that ruling party militants assaulted whites and
vendors of independent newspapers in Bulawayo. One German aid worker was beaten
in front of his children, they said.
Witnesses reported that militants threw firebombs at the offices of the
opposition Movement for Democratic Change in downtown Bulawayo and then stoned
fire trucks when they arrived. State media said the MDC burned its own offices,
allegedly to destroy evidence of involvement in the murder of a militant leader.
The presidential spokesman's criticism singled out journalists from The
Associated Press, Business Day of South Africa and the British newspapers The
Times, Guardian, Daily Telegraph and The Independent.
``It is now an open secret that these reporters are not only
distorting the facts but are assisting terrorists who stand accused in
our courts of law of abduction, torture and murder, by covering up and
misrepresenting the brutal deeds of terrorists,'' the spokesman was quoted as
saying.
``As for the correspondents, we would like them to know that we agree with
U.S. President Bush (news
- web
sites) that anyone who in any way finances, harbors or defends terrorists is
himself a terrorist. We, too, will not make any difference between terrorists
and their friends and supporters.''
The spokesman also contended that independent media in Zimbabwe had tried to
intimidate journalists who work for state-controlled newspapers and
broadcasters. ``This kind of media terrorism will not be tolerated,'' the
spokesman was quoted as saying.
Journalists for independent media have been arrested and beaten by ruling
party militants. Foreign journalists have been harassed, threatened, beaten and
arrested by militants and security forces.
The U.S. Embassy had no comment on the spokesman's remarks or on whether the
ambassador had sent a protest letter. However, a U.S. official, speaking on
condition of anonymity, said a protest note had been delivered by U.S. officials
in Washington to Zimbabwe's embassy there.
``AP's coverage of the violence in Zimbabwe and our coverage of moves by the
government against political opponents and the press have been consistently
factual, unbiased and fair,'' AP spokeswoman Kelly Smith Tunney said in New
York.
Belgian Foreign Minister Louis Michel, head of the EU delegation, described
the 90-minute meeting with Mugabe on Friday as stormy.
He said EU officials expressed concerns over the occupation of white-owned
farms, attacks on press freedoms and the decision to ban international election
monitors. Mugabe's reaction to monitors was particularly strong, he said.
``We just put on the table the issue and there was a very brutal
reaction,'' Michel said. ``We really didn't have an opportunity to have
a constructive exchange of views.''
There was no immediate comment from the government about the meeting.
From the newsroom of the BBC World Service
Saturday, 24 November,
2001, 12:16 GMT
British press scorn Zimbabwean accusations
British
newspapers have termed outrageous and absurd accusations by the
government in
Zimbabwe that foreign and local journalists there are aiding
terrorist
activities.
The editor-in-chief of the London-based Independent, Simon
Kelner, urged the
British Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, to protect those he
said were
endangering their lives to provide fair and balanced reports in the
British
media.
A Zimbabwean presidential spokesman quoted in the
official Herald newspaper
pinpointed reporters working for British and South
African newspapers, as
well as the Associated Press international news agency
and the Zimbabwe
Independent, as grossly distorting facts and assisting
'terrorists' through
their reports.
The British Government said
harassment of journalists would only damage
Zimbabwe's reputation further in
the eyes of the international community.
The Age Melbourne
Britain threatens diplomatic action over Zimbabwe
journalists
LONDON, Nov 24 AFP|Published: Sunday November 25, 4:28
AM
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw today threatened
diplomatic action
against Zimbabwe after Harare accused journalists,
including four working
for British newspapers, of aiding
terrorists.
The British High Commission in Zimbabwe has lodged an
official protest over
the threat to journalists who reported the
indiscriminate beatings of
whites, Straw said in a statement.
Straw
said he would be consulting European Union and Commonwealth colleagues
about
further action against President Robert Mugabe's government.
"I am
profoundly concerned by the reports of comments made by the
Zimbabwe
government spokesman in which he implied that foreign and local
journalists
were assisting terrorism," he said.
Guardian
Mugabe Tells Britain To 'Stay Out' Of Zimbabwe's
Elections
Saturday November 24, 2001 6:27 PM
President Robert
Mugabe is telling Britain to 'keep out' of Zimbabwe's
pending
elections.
EU leaders who met Mugabe to suggest the involvement of
international
observers - have already revealed they were met with an
'abusive reception'.
Now one of the country's newspapers is revealing he
has told EU countries to
keep out, as some of them are former
colonisers.
The state-controlled Daily Herald claims Mugabe was referring
to Britain's
Chris Patten - who was part of the EU delegation visiting
Mugabe.
The British were the former colonial power in
Zimbabwe.
Mugabe has been strongly criticized over alleged human rights
abuses, and
the 15-nation EU is considering sanctions.
It's claimed
these have escalated since ruling party militants began violent
occupations
of white-owned farms in March last year.
The EU wants to observe next
year's elections in Zimbabwe to make sure they
are fair.
The Daily
Herald quotes Mugabe as saying: "They want to come to do what and
in whose
capacity? I told them to keep out because some of them were our
former
colonizers,."
"We have enough experience in holding elections and we do
not need their
assistance," he added
Saturday, 24 November, 2001, 18:29 GMT
Zimbabwe heads for isolation
Mugabe does not welcome
criticism
Zimbabwe has moved closer to some form of sanctions
following a warning by the British foreign office not to harass foreign
correspondents based in Bulawayo.
This is in clear breach of the Abuja agreement which
specifically referred to Zimbabwe's commitment to the freedom of
expression
|
Jack Straw | A presidential spokesman was quoted in the government
newspaper as calling six journalists "terrorists" after they reported on last
week's political violence in Zimbabwe's second city, Bulawayo.
Also on Saturday, The Herald quoted President Robert Mugabe as rejecting
calls from a visiting European Union delegation to monitor next year's
presidential elections.
EU officials earlier said that relations were "critical".
British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said the High Commission had lodged an
official complaint over the "terrorist" slur.
'Demonised'
"This is in clear breach of the Abuja agreement which specifically referred
to Zimbabwe's commitment to the freedom of expression," he said, referring to
September's deal signed in the Nigerian capital.
This was supposed to stop political violence in Zimbabwe by solving the land
question.
Michel's talks with Mugabe ended in
failure
|
Correspondents of London's Guardian, Daily Telegraph, Times and Independent
newspapers were named and these papers have urged the British Government to
intervene.
They had all reported on attacks on whites and opposition activists by
government supporters. An unnamed presidential spokesman said their reports were
"demonising Zimbabwe, its government and people".
A lawyer for one of those named described the accusation as "extremely
serious".
'Not easy'
Last week, Mr Mugabe called the opposition MDC "terrorists" following the
killing of a leading war veteran, Cain Nkala, in Bulawayo.
They [EU] want to come to do what and in whose capacity? I
told them to keep out because some of them were our former colonizers
|
Robert Mugabe | Mr Straw also said that he would be consulting with his
counterparts from the EU and the Commonwealth.
The British protests follow the failure of this week's talks between an EU
delegation and Mr Mugabe in Harare on next year's elections.
Mr Mugabe was quoted as saying: "They [EU] want to come to do what and in
whose capacity? I told them to keep out because some of them were our former
colonizers."
Belgian Foreign Minister, Louis Michel agreed that the Harare talks had
failed.
"There is a difference of point of view between the European Union and
President Mugabe," he said. "We want to give a chance to have a positive
discussion...today it was not really easy to have that discussion."
The EU has threatened to impose sanctions against Harare if it is not allowed
to monitor next year's elections, in which Mr Mugabe will face his
strongest-ever challenge from the MDC's Morgan Tsvangirai.
Army deployed
Three foreign correspondents have already been expelled from Zimbabwe this
year and the printing press of a privately-run newspaper bombed in what the
opposition say is an attempt to silence critics ahead of the poll.
BBC correspondents have been banned from Harare since July.
Nkala's killing has led to renewed political
violence
|
Earlier |
Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 8:13 AM
Subject: Look after Mummy's special friend
Dear family and friends,
This last couple of weeks have seen Zimbabwe
plummeting into crisis. Barely a week after announcing that all farms with
Section 8 letters of acquisition would be served with 90 day eviction notices,
Agriculture minister, Dr Joseph Made, made another statement. All farm land not
so far listed for seizure would now be governed by maximum hectarages, owners
would be required to subdivide their land if it exceeded the specified limits. I
sat with 400 other farmers and listened as our agricultural union tried to
explain it all. They had no answers at all for the questions being put to them
because there are no answers. As we have for 20 months, we can only hope it is
all just rhetoric, intimidatory tactics and politicking but already the
country's economists are making some dire forecasts. At least 3000 industries
which depend directly on agriculture will collapse, Z$ 7.2 billion worth of
revenue per month will be lost. Thousands of other companies are also threatened
and reports in the Financial Gazette refer to banks, insurance companies,
clothing and other manufacturers. To put this into perspective, a farmer friend
in Gweru, faced with subdivision, told me: "Of course we all know that none of
these edicts are legal and we just keep on hoping... we are not sure what we
should do with the 800 head of cattle we have on the the rest of the farm -
assuming we get to keep the bit we live on..." The maximum hectarage ruling
affects my farm too so I know exactly what she means. Which part do you decide
to cede for subdivision - that where the dam is, where the river runs, where the
timber plantations are, where the dairy is, where the grazing is, where you grow
the vegetables, where the workers live, where your house is? Oh God this is the
final straw and while we all agonize on what to do and when, the lead story on
the front page of The Financial Gazette is that 10 000 hectares of Zimbabwean
farm land is to be given to Libyans - payment for fuel and other resources given
to our government.
The Zimbabwe government, desperate to clamp down
on any and all dissenting voices, and information like this from getting out,
have this week announced that the Public Order and Security Bill is pending.
This Bill will ban public gatherings and make it an offence (punishable by life
imprisonment or death) to publish or communicate: "... statements prejudicial to
the state...that incite violence, affect the defense and economic
interests...undermine the authority of the President by making public statements
or publishing statements that provoke hostility." Later in the week it was
announced that a 1997 Supreme Court Ruling which allowed freedom of movement was
to be overthrown. The carrying of Identity Cards is about to be mandatory again.
Justice Minister Chinamasa said on television that this was being done to:
"combat criminal and terrorist activities" The govt then went on to
name newspapers which they say are: "distorting the facts and assisting
terrorists" - The Times of London, the UK Independent, the South African Star
and the Zimbabwe Independent.
How all these new rulings affect me and this letter
I do not know. How it affects an extremely brave friend and 19 others still
detained in a Bulawayo gaol I do not know. How it affects the Zimbabwe Human
Rights Forum also remains to be seen. They have just released the October Report
on Political Violence and it runs to 15 pages. It tells of 3 murders/executions
and 99 cases of torture this past month. It tells of a 66 year old man beaten on
the soles of his feet for not attending a political rally. It tells of 5 people,
one of whom was a 9 year old child, being so badly beaten that one had a
fractured skull.
People keep asking me to give them hope so here it
is. An EU team left Zimbabwe yesterday. They did not make any progress, they
said that relations with Zimbabwe had now reached a "critical point" and that
their request for pre-election monitors had met with "a brutal reaction". On
Human Rights issues Chris Patten said on BBC this morning: "President Mugabe
brought it to a quick halt". But there is hope because the world have not given
up on us. Human rights Watch, an international group, this week officially
urged regional leaders to speak out strongly on the need for the rule of law in
Zimbabwe saying that "...President Mugabe must take urgent steps to restore the
rule of law and end harassment of Zimbabweans...". Canadian Alliance MP Keith
Martin has stated that this week he will introduce a motion in the House of
Commons to look at expelling us from the Commonwealth. I do not know how this
will affect us either but just the knowledge that we have not been forgotten is
cause for hope.
I know this letter has been long again and thank
you for reading to the bottom. A couple of quick things before I end. A
fortnight ago I gave the incorrect web address for Rod Stevens, it should be: www.rampion.btinternet.co.uk.
Sorry!
My 9 year old son, Richard, goes off to camp on Monday and is so excited
that he is beside himself. He has promised me that he will keep saying his
prayers at night and won't forget to say " and please look after Mummy's special
friend Simon in Bulawayo." I am glad that there is still some normality in parts
of our lives because after 4 days with no petrol or diesel, sugar or fresh milk
in Marondera, life's everyday events become that much more precious - and as
always teach me not to take anything for granted anymore. Until next week please
be persistent with email to me. I know they keep getting bounced back but I am
here. With love, cathy.
The Telegraph
Telegraph reporter is friend of terrorists, says
Mugabe
By Peta Thornycroft in Harare
(Filed:
24/11/2001)
PRESIDENT Mugabe's government yesterday threatened to
treat me and other
foreign correspondents as "terrorists" in its most
chilling attack yet on
the independent media in Zimbabwe.
The
state-controlled daily newspaper The Herald quoted a government
spokesman as
saying that reporting by six journalists, including myself and
the
correspondents of the Times, the Guardian and the Independent,
was
unacceptable.
We were accused of supporting opposition
"terrorists". This is the latest
step in a relentless campaign against the
press before next year's
presidential election when Mr Mugabe will face his
toughest challenge in two
decades in power in the troubled African
state.
The unnamed government spokesman is believed to be Jonathan Moyo,
the
information minister. He said yesterday: "We are very concerned about
the
gross and obscene misrepresentation of facts by the so-called
foreign
correspondents.
"It is now an open secret that these reporters
are not only distorting the
facts, but are assisting terrorists who stand
accused in our courts of law
of abduction, torture and murder.
"As for
the correspondents, we would like them to know that we agree with
President
Bush that anyone who in any way finances, harbours or defends
terrorists is
himself a terrorist.
"We, too, will not make any difference between
terrorists and their friends
or supporters." Charles Moore, the editor of The
Daily Telegraph, said last
night: "This accusation is absurd and threatening.
Peta Thornycroft is a
wholly professional journalist.
"To describe her
as a terrorist is itself a form of terrorism." The attack
which also named
correspondents for Associated Press, the South African
newspaper Business Day
and a human rights worker, follows the effective
expulsion of The Telegraph's
previous correspondent, David Blair, earlier
this year.
It came as the
European Union said relations with Zimbabwe had reached a
critical point
after inconclusive talks with Mr Mugabe. A senior EU
delegation said that it
had made little progress during almost two hours of
talks with Mr Mugabe over
his seizure of white-owned farms.
Louis Michel, the foreign minister of
Belgium, which holds the rotating EU
presidency, said: "The relationship
between the EU and Zimbabwe has arrived
at a very critical point . . . as a
result of our concern about land reform,
media freedom and also the way in
which elections will be assured."
In a climate of heightened political
tension, the Zimbabwean government
announced this week that it would rush
through new anti-terrorism security
laws.
The public order and
security Bill will give Mr Mugabe wide powers to arrest
opponents and refuse
them bail on a range of charges including insurgency,
kidnapping and
murder.
Guardian
I won't be cowed by threats, our man in Harare
vows
Andrew Meldrum
Saturday November 24, 2001
The
Guardian
The news that President Robert Mugabe's government wants to
treat me and
five other journalists as terrorists comes as a shock but hardly
a surprise.
It is shocking because the allegation that a small corps of
correspondents,
who have worked under difficult circumstances to report
accurately
Zimbabwe's economic and political crisis, support terrorists is
outrageous.
On the other hand the accusation can be no surprise to us,
because the
Mugabe government has already amply demonstrated that it will use
any means
to silence an independent or critical voice.
I went to
Zimbabwe shortly after independence in 1980 to write about its
successes as a
multiracial democracy. I began writing for the Guardian in
1983 after its
correspondent was expelled for reporting on the Matabeleland
massacres, in
which the army killed an estimated 20,000 civilians.
Now, because I am
writing about the country's struggle to maintain a
multiparty democracy and
the most basic elements of the rule of law, I am
branded a terrorist. It is
galling.
The foreign correspondents in Zimbabwe have reported on numerous
human
rights abuses, the state-sponsored murders of some 50 opposition
supporters
in the past year and the torture of many more, rampant corruption,
and the
government's involvement in the costly Congo war.
My work has
caused me some trouble before. Recently I have been threatened
by gangs of Mr
Mugabe's war veterans.
Most dramatically, when I was covering a peace
march in Harare last year, I
was knocked to the ground by a large chunk of
cement hurled at my head by a
war veteran. A policeman standing next to me
took no action. I was lucky to
escape with minor cuts and
bruising.
During the parliamentary elections in June last year I and two
other
journalists went into rural Mberengwa to investigate reports that
opposition
supporters were being beaten, tortured and killed. We interviewed
a man who
showed us where his buttocks had been flayed from his body. His
brother had
been killed during the same torture session.
Soon
afterwards we were surrounded by government supporters who threatened
us;
luckily, we managed to escape. I am proud that the photo I took,
although
thought too graphic to be used in the Guardian, has been used in
court as
evidence of torture by Zanu-PF.
Zimbabwean reporters covering the same
issues have paid a heavy price for
their work. Mark Chavunduka and Ray Choto
were kidnapped and tortured by
agents of the central intelligence
organisation because they dared to report
on dissent in the army against the
Congo war.
Now the government apparently wants to turn on the foreign
press, because
our reports have encouraged growing international
pressure.
Despite the increasingly repressive atmosphere, I love my life
in Zimbabwe.
I still believe that a multiracial society, where a decent
standard of
living is available to all people, is possible.
I am
currently out of Zimbabwe to attend a family funeral. But I will return
soon.
To stay away would suggest that I believe there is a shred of evidence
for
these charges.
Those who are trying to silence the press would consider
that a victory and
it would make life even more difficult for those who
remain. I cannot agree
to that.
The Telegraph
Zimbabwe police chief in land grab at white farm
By Peta
Thornycroft in Bulawayo
(Filed: 24/11/2001)
ZIMBABWE'S
commissioner of police has ordered a white farmer to leave his
land and home,
because he is moving in.
Augustine Chihuri and his wife arrived last
Saturday at Woodlands Farm,
Shamva, 60 miles north-west of Harare, in one of
the richest agricultural
areas in the country, and introduced himself to Mike
Butler, the farm owner.
Mr Chihuri told Mr Butler that he and his wife
would be arriving soon to
take up residence in the homestead and the farm. He
did not say when he
would be arriving. Mr Chihuri, who supports the ruling
Zanu-PF party, handed
Mr Butler a piece of paper and said he had been given
special permission to
acquire the farm.
The paper had been signed by
Joseph Made, the agriculture minister.
Yesterday, Mr Made refused to comment
after he heard the details of the
incident at Woodlands Farm. The incident
comes in a climate of mounting
repression against opposition supporters and
as President Mugabe steps up
his campaign against white farmers.
Mr
Butler's farm is lying fallow as so-called war veterans and
government
supporters have stopped him and his labourers from working the
land. He has
received only a preliminary notice of the government's intention
to acquire
the farm.
To make the seizure legal under Mr Mugabe's
recently changed acquisition
laws, Mr Butler still has to receive another
order, a Section 8, and be
given three months' notice to vacate his home and
land.
Mr Butler has since fled Woodlands Farm with his wife, Ann,
children and
elderly parents who also lived there. He sent a message through
a colleague
that he would not talk to the press as he feared for his
life.
Several incidents similar to that endured by the Butler family are
slowly
coming to light. In each case, farm owners who have been confronted
by
senior officials' demands to take over their land under so-called
special
permission are terrified of giving any information to the
press.
Mr Mugabe says his seizure of 85 per cent of white-owned farms is
to benefit
landless peasants. Hopes were raised earlier this year that the
crisis might
be defused after some of Africa's most influential leaders
supported reform
plans.
But Mr Mugabe has failed to abide by the terms
of the accord reached in the
Nigerian capital, Abuja. In the latest
diplomatic initiative, European
representatives said yesterday that they had
had a "difficult" time with Mr
Mugabe in a 90-minute meeting.
Louis
Michel, Belgium's deputy prime minister; Chris Patten, the European
Union
commissioner for external relations, and Javier Solana, the EU's
foreign
policy chief, left empty-handed and sombre after their meeting
MSNBC
Zimbabwe deploys army to quell violence --
radio
HARARE, Nov. 24 — The Zimbabwean government has sent army
units to the
northwest of the country to quell political violence following
the recent
killing of two members of the ruling party, state radio reported
on
Saturday.
MEDIA MONITORING PROJECT ZIMBABWE
MEDIA UPDATE # 2001/46
12 - 18 NOVEMBER
2001
1. SUMMARY
2. NKALA'S MURDER
3. FOLLOW UP ON ELECTORAL
ACT AMENDMENTS
4. COMMENTS FROM SUBSCRIBERS
1.
SUMMARY
ZANU PF's propaganda in the state media plumbed
unprecedented
depths during the coverage of the murder of Cain Nkala,
the
Bulawayo war veteran's leader. The state media exposed their
total
disregard for the general standards and ethics of journalism
to
churn out inflammatory hate speech reminiscent of the hate radio
before
and during the genocide in Rwanda. ZANU PF officials and
war veterans were
quoted describing the opposition, as 'terrorists'
or the 'enemy'.
The
media should report cases where authorities incite violence,
but they have a
particular responsibility to analyse such
statements and to expose the
negative impact they may have. In
the state media no comment was cited from
the MDC, who were
said to be implicated in the murder and vilified throughout
the
coverage. Nor was there any comment from Nkala's wife.
However,
what was more disturbing during the coverage is that
journalists from the
state media, who are supposed to be
watchdogs of such ills, seemed to be
conniving with the authorities
in maligning the opposition. Footage of
Nkala's exhumation and
pictures of another ZANU PF supporter Limukani
Luphahla who
was allegedly burnt to death by MDC supporters last month
were
repeatedly shown on ZTV with the apparent intention of
provoking
anger and hatred for the opposition. The state media went on
to
trample on the right of the accused to remain innocent until the
courts
prove them guilty.
The coverage left no doubt that there is an urgent
need for
alternative broadcasters who can objectively inform the citizens
of
this country and dispel poisonous information that the
Zimbabwean
citizens have been subjected to on a daily basis.
Such kind
of propaganda probably erodes the credibility of those
media houses loyal to
the ZANU PF government in the eyes of
most of their audience. But they may
play a direct role in inciting
violence among a minority of the public. The
publication of
maliciously fictitious reports for the purpose of inciting
violence
goes beyond mere bad journalism. As the International
Criminal
Tribunal on Rwanda has shown in recent judgements, it crosses
the
line into criminal behaviour.
2. NKALA'S MURDER
Before
Nkala's body was discovered, ZBC (12/11, 8pm) reported
that five people had
been arrested in connection with the abduction.
However, there were no names
given and the police were not
challenged on why they were not providing the
names of the
arrested. There was no analysis as to why the arrested had
been
incarcerated for more than forty-eight hours without trial and
clear
charges laid against them as stipulated by law. Reuben Barwe,
the
ZBC Chief correspondent, merely stated (ZTV, 12/11), ".no
police could
comment." on why the five did not appear in court.
Barwe stated that
someone asked him why he was so interested in
Nkala's death when there had
been many others before who were
not given the same attention. In a stunning
response that exposed
the broadcaster's myopic news selection he said, ".I
told him, if
you mean those people who died probably before I
started
reporting or when I was in Harare, I didn't hear about
them."
However, Barwe appears to have had no difficulty learning of
the
discovery of Nkala's body while in Harare.
In the same report,
Clifford Sibanda, a war veteran, was quoted
saying, "We are soldiers. As
soldiers we will have to defend
ourselves.I must assure you that they will
start crying when
we hit back."
Instead of subjecting this
inflammatory statement to scrutiny,
Barwe went on to buttress this claim by
quoting Vice President
Joseph Msika: "If people are itching for violence,
then they will
get violence." Coming from a national leader such
utterances
were highly irresponsible but were not subjected to any
analysis.
ZBC (radio, 13/11, 4pm) broke the news on the discovery
of
Nkala's body. ZTV carried the report in its evening vernacular and
8pm
bulletins. For the first time in many years, ZTV viewers
witnessed police
interrogating suspects live on camera. Audiences
were told that the two
suspects, who are said to be MDC
supporters, had "voluntarily" agreed to tell
the police where they
buried Nkala in an attempt to dispel any reservations
that they
might have been forcibly coerced into submission. Also,
viewers
were shown the exhumation of the body without prior warning
to
those viewers of nervous disposition. Assistant Commissioner
Oliver
Mashonganyika, ZANU PF Bulawayo Chairman Jabulani
Sibanda and Home Affairs
Minister John Nkomo used the occasion
to shower the police with praises for a
job well done - despite the
fact that in more than a year they have still not
found Patrick
Nabanyama, the MDC polling agent who was abducted last
year.
The Bulawayo ZANU PF chairman who was present at the
scene
continued with threats, ".That is terrorism and we are going
to
fight it. Politically, militarily, whichever way. We have got the
right
as a people to defend ourselves. And I have got a right to
mobilize my people
in my province against terrorism and that
I am going to do".
Some war
veterans' executive members, Joseph Chinotimba,
Patrick Nyaruwata, Agrippa
Gava and Endy Mhlanga and three
Harare residents were also quoted denouncing
the murder of Nkala.
Barwe went further to ask Minister Nkomo (ZTV,
13/11, 8pm)
leading questions. ".Could you infer that this was done in
a
military fashion because shoe strings really don't kill people?"
Barwe
asked.
This was the cue for the minister to trot out his conspiracy
theory
to explain the murder, saying, ".this is an operation
very
reminiscent of what the Selous Scouts used to do and we can
read and
see very clearly a similar pattern in this particular
area".
Borrowing
from Jabulani Sibanda, Minister Nkomo also described
the murder as an act of
"terrorism" and said, ".If it means going
into a cave to fish out that fellow
we are going to do it" -
presumably a deliberate echo of US President George
W. Bush's
plan to get Osama bin Laden.
However, there were a number of
questions surrounding the issue
that remained unanswered in the coverage. For
instance the
audiences were not told why the police had to invite a
pathologist
all the way from Harare as if there were none in
Bulawayo.
Exhibits of evidence, such as the money found with the
suspects,
the truck used and AK rifles, which were reportedly used during
the
abduction, were missing in the report. And no reporter from the
ZBC
sought such information from the police.
It all looked like a well-staged
tragic drama, as the other ZBC
reporter Tapfuma Machakaire was there to film
Mashonganyika
delivering the sad news to the family.
Notably, ZBC
failed to get a comment from Nkala's wife who was
the main witness in the
case. Her description of the abduction
would presumably have been relevant in
identifying those
responsible.
While other media reported that Nkala's
body was found on
Tuesday, The Herald (14/11) reported that Nkala had been
found on
Monday. No clarification was made. Police spokesman
Wayne
Bvudzijena set the tone for the government press when he told
The
Herald (14/11) that "Police have established strong leads which
could
implicate some opposition politicians. The kidnap was
political and some
senior persons of the MDC in Bulawayo
could be arrested." ZIMPAPERS simply
took the statement to
mean that the opposition had committed the crime even
before
they were tried in the courts. Thereafter ZIMPAPERS maintained
and
reinforced this link, and ignored all the principles of crime
reporting by
sentencing the MDC ahead of the courts. Once
charges were brought, the case
became sub judice, apparently
putting The Herald in contempt of
court.
It was left to The Daily News (14/11) to give the MDC side of
the
story. It quoted the MDC secretary-general, Welshman Ncube,
denying
that his party was responsible. As has become the norm,
police spokesman
Bvudzijena reportedly "parried" questions from
the private daily, but gave an
interview to the public press. In the
same article, reference was made to
Vice-President Joseph
Msika's earlier threats of a "bloodbath" and war
veterans' requests
for guns to track down perpetrators.
The discovery
of Nkala's body resulted in the attacks on MDC
supporters' houses in Bulawayo
(ZBC, 14/11, 8pm). In an attempt
to justify the attack, the reporter stated
that people who were
angered by the murder of Nkala conducted the attack.
None of the
"people" have been arrested for the attack.
In the same
bulletin, war veteran Andrew Ndlovu said, ".Now we
have realized that it
(MDC) is a terrorist party and we feel.that
the MDC must be banned with
immediate effect".
Mashonganyika was also quoted stating that the
arrested suspects
would be charged with terrorism under the Law and
Order
Maintenance Act (LOMA), a colonial law that was used against
the
nationalists during the liberation struggle.
The Herald (15/11)
reported, in passing, the subsequent violence
which resulted in destruction
of three houses belonging to MDC
supporters, in Bulawayo under a misleading
headline "MDC MP
flees". The Herald claimed that the MP, Fletcher
Dulini-Ncube,
whom police named as a suspect, had fled. No attempt was
made
to seek any comment from the MDC to substantiate the claim,
leaving
the impression that he was responsible for the crime and
evading
arrest.
The same article stated, "members of the public reacted to
the
kidnapping and murder of Cde Nkala", in an attempt to mask
the
identity of the perpetrators of violence. Surprisingly, the
Bulawayo-based
Chronicle did not report the violence - perhaps
because its readers would
know who had initiated it - and merely
reported on the court appearances of
the suspects, a story also
carried by The Herald.
The Daily News
(15/11) reported the violence under the headline
"Terror in Bulawayo" and
blamed "suspected" Zanu-PF and war
veterans. An MDC councillor whose house
was demolished
corroborated the story. The article linked the violence to
earlier
inciting statements by Vice-President Msika and the war
veterans'
leadership. In the same story, it was revealed that the
MDC
suspects were denied access to their lawyers and relatives and
that
some were held in police detention for seven days, contrary to
the
constitutional stipulation that a suspect should be brought to
court within
forty-eight hours of arrest.
The same issue of the Daily News reported
that two MDC officials,
accused of being responsible for the abduction of
Nkala, were
abducted in Chitungwiza by suspected war veterans. The
paper
followed up the story on Saturday (17/11) announcing that one of
the
abducted was recuperating in a Chitungwiza hospital after
being assaulted.
The patient was quoted as saying that he and his
colleague had been taken to
Highlands police station where they
were forced to write statements about
their lives and their party
structures before being taken to Harare Central
Police where they
were tortured. The public press ignored the
story.
In an apparent response to the "MDC MP flees" story, The
Daily
News (16/11) reported a statement issued by MDC secretary-
general,
Welshman Ncube, who denied that the MP had fled. He
said Dulini-Ncube had
attended a Parliamentary Committee
meeting and another meeting at the party's
offices in Harare and
that his lawyers had arranged with the police to meet
at the police
station on Thursday (15/11). Ncube was quoted questioning
the
credibility of ZIMPAPERS saying, "It is clear therefore that
The
Herald and The Chronicle editors who are slaves to the Zanu
PF
election strategy have no intention whatsoever to write any
truth about the
MDC."
Nevertheless, The Herald (16/11) was unrelenting. Under a
front-
page headline "MDC MP arrested" it played down the fact
that
Dulini-Ncube handed himself to police and maintained "He had
been on
the run since Tuesday."
The Herald editorial philosophy on the matter was
epitomised by
Phillip Magwaza, the political editor of the paper in
highly
sensational articles titled "MDC reliving the Nazi era" (14/11)
and
"Nkala prayed for his captors" (16/11). However, it was the
latter
article that exposed how scribes can suspend all standards
of
journalism just to toe the line. The writer gave what purported to
be
an eyewitness account of the murder, starting from "minutes
before" his
death through the whole process of his execution to his
burial in a shallow
grave. He detailed what Nkala said to his
captors, his prayers, and how he
was killed. The article
blasphemously likened Nkala's death to that of Jesus
Christ. No
source was attributed to the information, suggesting that the
author
was an eyewitness who was present when Nkala was murdered.
In
reality the article appears to have been fictitious from start to
finish.
Doubtlessly, the thrust of the report was not to clear the
mystery
behind the murder, but to rouse emotional discontent
primarily
against the MDC and whites. But in doing so the writer was
not
sympathetic to the emotional damage such reportage would inflict
on
the family of the deceased. The report claimed, without
substantiation, that
the MDC had been trying to exterminate war
veterans for some time, including
"attempts" on the late war
veterans leader, Chenjerai Hunzvi. Part of the
article read "But as
the events unfold, it is no surprise that the terrorist
plan to
abduct and kill Cde Nkala was hatched way back in February."
In
blatant contempt of court, it gratuitously concluded, "The die is
cast. The
heinous act has been committed and for the MDC to
try and absolve themselves
under the guise of their members
being denied access to lawyers and a ploy to
implicate their
member in a well-orchestrated plan by Zanu PF is
wishful
thinking that can only convince the most naïve."
The sister
paper, The Sunday Mail (18/11) followed the Herald
using strikingly similar
alarmist and rabble-rousing sensational
language. The political editor of
that paper, Munyaradzi Huni,
copying his colleague Magwaza, reproduced a
chunk about
Nkala's last prayers: "And like a humble man he was,
he
pleaded with the terrorists to let him pray. When he prayed he
did not
only pray for himself. He prayed for his killers so that
God could forgive
them and lastly he asked God to look after
his family."
Like The
Herald, The Sunday Mail reported that Nkala shouted for
help and fought back
"viciously" before he was overpowered.
Constant reference was made to "The
Struggle" or "Third
Chimurenga" to arouse nationalistic zeal. Huni reiterated
that
MDC was to blame for the act, and were referred to as
"terrorists."
The article made reference to unrelated MDC officials'
pending
court cases to give credence that the party is a
"terrorist"
organisation. In an alarmist fashion, the author then added
"The
whisper that is going around the country now is: 'How safe are
we?
Will the terrorists strike again?' One hopes not." Two
boxed short articles,
"He's rabidly against govt" and "Once a racist
always a racist" denigrating
MDC legislators David Coltart and Roy
Bennet, were also juxtaposed inside the
main story.
Huni's article also reported that Coltart and Bennet, both
MDC
MPs, were members of the colonial British South African Police
(BSAP).
Copies of the certificates of services and a photograph of
Coltart were
attached as proof. The intention was to invoke hatred
against those who were
directly involved with the former colonial
institutions.
It was clear
that the state media was not prepared to tell the public
the truth in its
coverage of violence that erupted in Bulawayo and
Kadoma.
The state
broadcaster (radio & ZTV, 6pm and 8pm, 16/11) gave
emphasis to the
burning down of a building owned by ZANU PF
acting National Commissar Dr.
Sikhanyiso Ndhlovu and ZANU PF
supporters' houses. The chronology of events
was presented in a
way that implicated MDC as perpetrators. In an attempt to
cover up
for the violence started by the war veterans during their
so-called
peaceful march, Tapfuma Machakaire, ZBC Bulawayo Bureau
Chief,
stated, "Although party leaders tried by all means to
control the angry
crowd, the march was not without
incidents".
What he meant by
"incidents" was violent attacks by war veterans
who stoned cars on the
streets of Bulawayo. This was shown to
ZTV viewers, making it clear who the
perpetrators were. After this
unrest only MDC suspects were arrested and no
war veterans.
ZBC Mashonaland West Bureau Chief Douglas Rinemhota
reported
(radio and ZTV, 6 &8pm, 16/11) that MDC supporters had
attacked,
unprovoked, ZANU PF supporters who were peacefully
demonstrating
in memory of Nkala. ZTV viewers were shown burnt
houses belonging to ZANU PF
supporters. Again only MDC
supporters were arrested.
Minister Nkomo
was invited to the studio on ZTV, for the second
time, to comment on the
murder of Nkala and subsequent violence.
Nkomo reiterated his earlier
statements that the murder of both
Nkala and Luphahla were "acts of
terrorism" and blamed the
MDC, which was not accorded any platform to state
its side of the
story.
This overt bias on the part of the ZBC left no
doubt that the aim of
the broadcaster was not to inform the public
objectively but to
misrepresent facts to discredit and incite violence
against the
opposition.
The Daily News (17/11) only reported the
Bulawayo incident and
blamed the war veterans for starting the violence. The
paper gave
the impression that the MDC youths only acted in retaliation.
On
the other hand, The Herald of the same day reported the violence
in
both Bulawayo and Kadoma but narrowed it down to the
destruction
committed by MDC supporters. In an apparent attempt
to exonerate ZANU PF and
its militia of war veterans the public
press flagship
stated:
"Meanwhile, criminal elements in the opposition MDC went
on
orgy of violence in vain attempt to burn down evidence at
their party's
office in Bulawayo".
This was also mentioned on ZBC (16/11, 6 &
8pm)
To support these unsubstantiated claims, the Herald sought
the
police comment for corroboration. The article went on to state
that
the move "follows unsuccessful attempts by senior MDC
officials in
Bulawayo to poison suspects who are already in
custody" and that the police
have stopped allowing the suspects
to get food from outside the complex. This
was merely used to
defend the unlawful decision taken by the police to deny
suspects
their right to access their lawyers and relatives.
When Cain
Nkala's body arrived in Harare on Saturday (17/11),
there were reports of
violence in the city. Again, the state media
blamed the opposition for the
violence and denied it the right of
reply.
The Zimbabwe Independent
(16/11) reportage on the matter was
reticent. It carried a straight court
report without speculation and
reported that Dulini-Ncube had handed himself
to the police.
The Standard (18/11) scored a first by including a component
that
had been missing in the media: the Nkala family's voice. The
report
quoted an array of sources: relatives, neighbours, and a
war
veteran, who understandably preferred anonymity given the nature
of
the case at hand. The sources exonerated the MDC and blamed
the death on
in-fighting within Zanu PF. One neighbour was quoted
saying he had heard
Nkala calling out the names of his abductors,
a fact partly corroborated in
both The Herald and The Sunday Mail
reports. The weekly also carried a
comment that listed some of the
loopholes in the case and concluded that Zanu
PF was
responsible. Particularly, it queried why the suspects were
denied
access to their lawyers and why Msika promised a "bloodbath"
before
the discovery of the corpse.
The Zimbabwe Mirror (16/11) carried MDC
President Morgan
Tsvangirai's condemnation of the murder but distanced his
party
from the killing. The Mirror also had an analytical and
objective
opinion piece in its Behind the Words column, which gave
three
possibilities on who could be responsible for the murder
without
specifically blaming it on anyone. The Financial Gazette
(15/11)
made reference to Nkala's murder in an opinion article in which
this
and other deaths were blamed "squarely on Mugabe, his
government and
the ineffectual Chihuri."
President Robert Mugabe capped a week
characterised by his
party's inflammatory and inciteful statements during the
burial of
Nkala at the National Heroes' Acre. In his highly
inflammatory
speech (ZTV, 18/11, 11am & 8.30pm), the President
threatened
the opposition and warned that the MDC's days were numbered.
He
further went on to allege that the British government was
supporting
terrorism. During his speech, ZTV viewers were shown
placards carried by ZANU
PF supporters with messages such as:
"Kill the Terrorists" and "Beware of MDC
shoelaces", to
complement the President's venomous tirade.
3.
FOLLOW UP TO THE ELECTORAL ACT
The private press exposed what it regarded
as the government's
intention to rig the elections through its amendment of
the Electoral
Act. The public press, which simply endorsed the amendment
last
week, ignored the issue this week.
In its comment The Daily News
(12/11) observed that confinement
of postal votes to uniformed forces, as
required by the amendment,
will give ZANU PF a chance to add votes to its
advantage. It also
raised concern over the exclusion of Zimbabwean residents
outside
the country who have been "virtually banned" from voting as
they
are required to produce travel documents and bills to prove they
have
lived in constituencies for a continuous period of 12 months. It
concluded
that because the Act gives ZANU PF an unfair
advantage and allowed rigging in
the absence of impartial eyes it
was therefore "criminal."
Another
opinion piece, which appeared in the Daily News (13/11),
declared that
international monitors and observers, who under the
new Act could be
excluded, would foster transparency. The writer
asked, "Why has the
government suddenly become so
paranoid about this particular presidential
election.?
Someone must explain how 24 000 monitors and observers
can
undermine our sovereignty."
The Financial Gazette (15/11) claimed that
under the proposed
amendments, the government intelligence arm, the CIO, had
been
drafted into election monitoring and voter education under the
guise
of civil servants. However, the authenticity of the claim
was
compromised by use of an unnamed government source. The
Financial
Gazette also featured a widely sourced report under a
headline, "Mugabe tunes
law to rig election". Tarcey Zimbiti, the
director of the Catholic Commission
for Justice and Peace was
quoted saying, "The new laws will prevent many
people
suspected of supporting the opposition from voting on one
hand
while on the other they will effectively prevent those
permitted to vote from
receiving adequate information and
knowledge about their right to vote for
whomever they wish."
Another source, Bishop Peter Hatendi, was also
quoted saying the
ESC could not be independent because it lacked resources
and
because it fell under the Justice, Legal and Parliamentary
Affairs
minister. The Minister, Patrick Chinamasa, is the architect
and
advocate of the new Act. Prof Eliphas Mukonoweshuro, an
academic, was
quoted saying "But any government coming out
of such a blatantly rigged
election process will not be
recognised by Zimbabweans, let alone by the
civilised world,
and one wonders how long such a government could
last."
The report also alluded to a dubious voter education
being
conducted by the Registrar-General's office, which is only
targeting
rural areas and resettlement schemes, Zanu PF strongholds,
whilst
ignoring the urban centres where the opposition enjoys
popular
support. The Gazette also had a comment on the issue.
The
Zimbabwe Mirror reported the amendment under the headline,
Opposition
threatens court action over proposed amendment to
Electoral Act, and quoted
an array of voices condemning the
government move.
4. FROM OUR
SUBSCRIBERS
A RESPONSE TO BEN MAHAKA
By Dixe Wills, Writers in Prison
Committee, International PEN
I feel compelled to write a note in response
to Mr. Ben Mahaka's
attack on MMPZ published in Media Update #
2001/44.
As Mr Mahaka points out at length, impartiality in the media
in
Zimbabwe is a rare enough commodity but, as one who reads the
MMPZ's
bulletins from outside the country (I'm based in the UK), I
can only say
that, with occasional exceptions, I have found them to
be the most objective
view I have come across in Zimbabwe and a
welcome relief from the barrage of
propaganda all too often
masquerading as news.
It is noteworthy that
Mr Mahaka does not give a single example of
alleged bias to back up his
argument, thus casting a shadow over
any claims he himself might have of
objectivity.
It is incumbent on us all to be vigilant in order to monitor
the
monitors, so to speak, for which I commend Mr Mahaka. I only
think
that on this occasion, his concerns are wide of the mark.
GET
PUBLISHED!
By Elsiha Maricho, Project Officer, SAT Programme,
Harare
I have been following this posting for sometime now. I suggest
that
its time it got published as a weekly column in newspapers. It
will
provide a different perspective to the one by ZBC TV. It is
most
likely that it is only the independent media that might accept it.
I
like the objectivity.
INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE
I note the increase
in "hate" language and incitements to violence.
Is it possible for MMPZ to
begin a numerical count by type of
language (race, ethnicity, etc) and
include in your weekly report?
Keep up the good work!
MORE ON HATE
LANGUAGE
By Rasheat Mukundu, Harare, Zimbabwe
The analysis in this
week's report did not mention the violence that
took place in Bulawayo and
its relation with the Nkala murder. I feel
that the murder is preparation for
more violence as we drift towards
the 2002 Presidential Election. Media
reports from the state media
(ZBC and ZIMPAPERS) also, more than anything
else, are meant
to incite people, encourage hatred and violence. The use
of
language using words such as enemy, terrorist, etc is xenophobic
and
illegal in a normal democracy.
The MEDIA UPDATE is produced and
circulated by the
Media Monitoring Project Zimbabwe (MMPZ). Please
send
all queries and comments to the Project Coordinator, 15
Duthie
Avenue, Alexandra Park, Harare, Tel/fax: 263 4
703702, E-mail: monitors@mweb.co.zw
Previous copies of
MMPZ reports can be accessed at
http://www.icon.co.zw/mmpz
We
appreciate comments on local and international media
coverage of local issues
and events and the work of MMPZ
from our subscribers.
Please feel free
to circulate this message
ENDS
- Mugabe loses his cool -
Times
- 'Landless' police chief seizes farm -
DTel
- International reporters threatened -
Guardian
- Bulawayo reporting lead to outburst -
Toronto Star
- Foreign protest at Nkala arrests irks
Mugabe - NYTimes
- "I won't be cowed" -
Guardian
From The Times (UK), 24 November
2001
Mugabe snubs EU on election
rights
Harare - Three of the European Union’s most senior officials
left Harare yesterday, shocked after a confrontation with President Mugabe, who
made clear that he would not consider EU insistence on minimum international
norms for next year’s presidential elections in Zimbabwe. Louis Michel, the
Belgian Foreign Minister, who led the EU delegation, said that he had received
"a brutal reaction" from Mr Mugabe when they expressed their concern about the
surge of violence and repression in recent weeks as the country moves towards
elections that are due within four months. Mr Michel said: "We just put on the
table the issues. Clearly, unless the elections have complied with certain
minimum standards, it will be very difficult, not to say impossible, for them to
be recognised by the EU. We really did not have an opportunity to have a
constructive exchange of views," he said, adding: "We have to admit it (the EU’s
relationship with Zimbabwe) is at a critical point."
Diplomatic sources said that Mr Michel, Chris Patten, the EU
Commissioner for External Affairs, and Javier Solana, the EU’ foreign policy
chief, were visibly angry after their 90-minute meeting with Mr Mugabe. Mr
Patten said that the 77-year-old leader, who is determined to win a fourth
six-year presidential term, "did not indicate he would welcome European
observers" to the elections. He added that his choice of words in describing Mr
Mugabe’s reaction was "putting it mildly" . The delegation raised a United
Nations report that was published this week that accused Zimbabwe of prolonging
the war in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where Zimbabwe has about 11,000
troops, so that ruling party bosses could "plunder" the country’s reserves of
gold, diamonds, timber and coltan, a rare mineral that is used in the
manufacture of cellular telephones. "President Mugabe rejected it out of hand,"
Mr Michel said. The report was considered "not objective".
Despite Mr Michel’s hopes that the EU would be able to continue
discussions with Zimbabwe, diplomats said that the process begun in Brussels
this month toward "appropriate action" against Harare, and the likelihood of a
form of sanctions, now appeared to be inevitable. Diplomats said that Mr
Mugabe’s rebuff to the EU was a turning point in his relations with the West.
His action would result in the loss of Western influence in the country and of
the restraint that the West had encouraged against oppression and violence. Mr
Patten said that he had often visited Zimbabwe as a minister in the Eighties,
but now, he said: "I leave after this brief visit profoundly sad and worried."
Security officials suffered embarrassment at Harare International Airport when
they tried to prevent a group of foreign and local independent reporters
attending the EU delegates’ press conference. When the three delegates were told
of the prohibition, they said that they would hold the press conference in the
car park, where the journalists were waiting. "We told them it would look good
for the cameras," Mr Patten said. The officials relented.
From The Daily Telegraph (UK), 24
November
Zimbabwe police chief in land grab
at white farm
Bulawayo - Zimbabwe’s commissioner of police has ordered a
white farmer to leave his land and home, because he is moving in. Augustine
Chihuri and his wife arrived last Saturday at Woodlands Farm, Shamva, 60 miles
north-west of Harare, in one of the richest agricultural areas in the country,
and introduced himself to Mike Butler, the farm owner. Mr Chihuri told Mr Butler
that he and his wife would be arriving soon to take up residence in the
homestead and the farm. He did not say when he would be arriving. Mr Chihuri,
who supports the ruling Zanu PF party, handed Mr Butler a piece of paper and
said he had been given special permission to acquire the farm. The paper had
been signed by Joseph Made, the agriculture minister. Yesterday, Mr Made refused
to comment after he heard the details of the incident at Woodlands Farm.
The incident comes in a climate of mounting repression against
opposition supporters and as President Mugabe steps up his campaign against
white farmers. Mr Butler's farm is lying fallow as so-called war veterans and
government supporters have stopped him and his labourers from working the land.
He has received only a preliminary notice of the government's intention to
acquire the farm. To make the seizure legal under Mr Mugabe's recently changed
acquisition laws, Mr Butler still has to receive another order, a Section 8, and
be given three months' notice to vacate his home and land. Mr Butler has since
fled Woodlands Farm with his wife, Ann, children and elderly parents who also
lived there. He sent a message through a colleague that he would not talk to the
press as he feared for his life. Several incidents similar to that endured by
the Butler family are slowly coming to light. In each case, farm owners who have
been confronted by senior officials' demands to take over their land under
so-called special permission are terrified of giving any information to the
press.
Mr Mugabe says his seizure of 85 per cent of white-owned farms
is to benefit landless peasants. Hopes were raised earlier this year that the
crisis might be defused after some of Africa's most influential leaders
supported reform plans. But Mr Mugabe has failed to abide by the terms of the
accord reached in the Nigerian capital, Abuja. In the latest diplomatic
initiative, European representatives said yesterday that they had had a
"difficult" time with Mr Mugabe in a 90-minute meeting. Louis Michel, Belgium's
deputy prime minister; Chris Patten, the European Union commissioner for
external relations, and Javier Solana, the EU's foreign policy chief, left
empty-handed and sombre after their meeting.
From The Guardian (UK), 24
November
Mugabe calls UK reporters
terrorists
President Robert Mugabe's government stepped up its
intimidation campaign against the international press yesterday by describing
six Harare-based journalists as "terrorists" who had filed false reports on the
violence sweeping the country. Provoking a storm of protest around the world, a
government spokesman was quoted in the state-controlled Herald newspaper as
accusing the journalists of making "gross and obscene misrepresentation of
facts". The journalists included the Guardian's Zimbabwe correspondent, Andrew
Meldrum, who has reported for the newspaper from Harare for 18 years. Mr
Meldrum, who is currently out of the country, dismissed the "outrageous" charges
against him and his five colleagues. "This turns logic on its head, because it
has been the government's own policies of state-sponsored violence that has
brought terrorism into the lives of ordinary Zimbabweans," he said, vowing to
continue reporting from Harare.
The row flared up after the Herald quoted a government
spokesman, believed to be the information minister Jonathan Moyo, accusing the
six journalists of "assisting terrorists" brought before the Zimbabwean courts
on a variety of charges. The others are Jan Raath of the Times, Peta Thornycroft
of the Daily Telegraph, Basildon Peta of the Independent newspaper group, Angus
Shaw of Associated Press, Dumisani Muleya of South Africa's Business Day. A
South Africa-based human rights campaigner, Richard Carver, was also named. The
government spokesman imitated George Bush's warning that anyone who harboured a
terrorist would be counted as a terrorist. "As for the correspondents, we would
like them to know that we agree with President Bush that anyone who in any way
finances, harbours or defends terrorists is himself a terrorist," he was quoted
as saying. "We too will not make any difference between terrorists and their
friends and supporters."
His remarks are the government's most serious attempt to
intimidate journalists in the run-up to next year's presidential election, when
President Mugabe will face the toughest challenge of his career from Morgan
Tsvangirai, who leads the Movement for Democratic Change. The outburst follows
the expulsion of three journalists from Zimbabwe earlier this year. Alan
Rusbridger, editor of the Guardian, wrote to the foreign secretary, Jack Straw,
and the International Press Institute last night. "I have asked them to make
urgent representations to guarantee Andrew's physical safety and his ability to
report freely," he said. The Foreign Office said last night: "If true, this is a
very worrying comment for a government spokesman to make, particularly in the
light of Zimbabwe's commitment at Abuja [September's Commonwealth meeting] to
freedom of expression. "The eyes of the world are on Zimbabwe - the harassment
of journalists will only damage its reputation further in the eyes of the
international community." But Mr Mugabe demonstrated his growing isolation from
the international community yesterday by rejecting the request of a European
Union delegation to allow international monitors to oversee next year's
election. Chris Patten, the EU external affairs commissioner, said: "President
Mugabe did not indicate - I put the point mildly - that he would welcome
election observers. "We did not have a meeting of minds with President
Mugabe."
From The Toronto Star, 23
November
Zimbabwe brands foreign journalists
'terrorists'
Harare - Foreign correspondents who reported indiscriminate
beatings of whites a week ago will be treated as terrorists, a presidential
spokesperson warned today. The statement appeared in the state-owned Herald
newspaper on the same day a European Union delegation said embattled President
Robert Mugabe had heatedly rejected EU demands for international observers at
elections that are supposed to be held by early next year. Mugabe's government
is being strongly criticized over alleged human rights abuses and a crackdown on
the opposition that have escalated since ruling party militants began violent
occupations of white-owned farms in March 2000. The 15-country EU is considering
sanctions. With the economy near collapse, Mugabe's popularity has plummeted,
and western diplomats and political analysts have speculated he is trying to
engineer a chaotic situation that would allow him to declare a state of
emergency and toughen his crackdown before elections. The presidential
spokesperson, who was not identified by name, said a protest letter from U.S.
Ambassador Joseph Sullivan about Nov. 16 violence in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's second
biggest city, was "likely to trigger a diplomatic furor." He said it was based
on "gross and obscene misrepresentation of facts by the so-called foreign
correspondents."
Western diplomats confirmed that ruling party militants
assaulted whites and vendors of independent newspapers in Bulawayo. One German
aid worker was beaten in front of his children, they said. Witnesses reported
that militants threw firebombs at the offices of the opposition Movement for
Democratic Change in downtown Bulawayo and then stoned fire trucks when they
arrived. State media said the MDC burned its own offices, allegedly to destroy
evidence of involvement in the murder of a militant leader. The presidential
spokesperson's criticism singled out journalists from The Associated Press,
Business Day of South Africa and four British newspapers: the Times, Guardian,
Daily Telegraph and Independent. "It is now an open secret that these reporters
are not only distorting the facts but are assisting terrorists who stand accused
in our courts of law of abduction, torture and murder, by covering up and
misrepresenting the brutal deeds of terrorists," the spokesperson was quoted as
saying. "As for the correspondents, we would like them to know that we agree
with U.S. President (George W.) Bush that anyone who, in any way, finances,
harbours or defends terrorists is himself a terrorist. We, too, will not make
any difference between terrorists and their friends and supporters."
The spokesperson also contended that independent media in
Zimbabwe had tried to intimidate journalists who work for state-controlled
newspapers and broadcasters. "This kind of media terrorism will not be
tolerated," the spokesperson was quoted as saying. Journalists for independent
media have been arrested and beaten by ruling party militants. Foreign
journalists have been harassed, threatened, beaten and arrested by militants and
security forces. The U.S. Embassy had no comment on the spokesman's remarks or
on whether the ambassador had sent a protest letter. However, a U.S. official,
speaking on condition of anonymity, said a protest note had been delivered by
U.S. officials in Washington to Zimbabwe's embassy there. "AP's coverage of the
violence in Zimbabwe and our coverage of moves by the government against
political opponents and the press have been consistently factual, unbiased and
fair," AP spokesperson Kelly Smith Tunney said in New York.
Belgian Foreign Minister Louis Michel, head of the EU
delegation, described the 90-minute meeting with Mugabe on Friday as stormy. He
said EU officials expressed concerns over the occupation of white-owned farms,
attacks on press freedoms and the decision to ban international election
monitors. Mugabe's reaction to monitors was particularly strong, he said. "We
just put on the table the issue and there was a very brutal reaction," Michel
said. "We really didn't have an opportunity to have a constructive exchange of
views." There was no immediate comment from the government about the
meeting.
From The New York Times, 23
November
West's envoys, unhappy, find
Zimbabwe unhelpful Mugabe's moves after a killing
Johannesburg - The police found the battered body of Cain Nkala
on Nov. 13 in a shallow grave in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe's second largest city. He
was a small- town supporter of President Robert Mugabe and a man virtually
unknown in the West. But the government's response to his killing has touched
off an international furor. Over the last two weeks, the authorities in Zimbabwe
have arrested more than a dozen members of the leading opposition party and
charged them with murdering Mr. Nkala. Government-backed militants threw
gasoline bombs at an opposition party office. Officials have branded their
rivals and critics "terrorists" and have vowed to introduce tough new laws to
restrict movement and assembly.
This week, State Department officials in Washington summoned
Zimbabwe's ambassador to express concern. Today, a delegation from the European
Union raised similar issues in a meeting with Mr. Mugabe in Zimbabwe's capital,
Harare. But the American and European officials said they left their meetings
with little hope that the political climate would improve. Many believe Mr.
Mugabe is using Mr. Nkala's death as an excuse to attack his opponents as he
braces for the most hotly contested election of his political career. Mr.
Mugabe, 77, has led Zimbabwe for 21 years and his popularity has waned sharply.
Once one of Africa's most promising and prosperous countries, Zimbabwe is now
racked with food shortages and surging unemployment, and an increasingly
authoritarian government seems more and more willing to crack down on its
critics at the approach of election day, which is expected early next year.
"We're not really optimistic," Olivier Alsteens, a spokesman
for the European Union, said today in a telephone interview after the meeting
with Mr. Mugabe in Harare. "The meeting was not good." "We expressed our
concerns about the threats against some of the opposition leaders, about the
media, about the seizure of white farms," Mr. Alsteens said. "But we didn't meet
somebody who was listening. He was just closing his ears, I would say. We were
hoping there could be some kind of discussion, but not at all, not at all."
American officials said they had urged Zimbabwe's government to pave the way for
fair elections by curbing violence and intimidation and by allowing the
opposition access to the media and to voters rolls. "We are concerned that time
is passing and the situation is deteriorating and the government is not taking
steps to create an environment in which you can have elections," an American
official said in a telephone interview from Washington. "We needed to be clearly
on the record with them."
Jonathan Moyo, Zimbabwe's minister of information, was not in
his office today and could not be reached for comment. But a state-controlled
newspaper, The Herald, sharply criticized American officials today and accused
them of responding to "false and alarmist reports." The newspaper listed eight
Harare-based journalists by name and blamed them for "the obscene
misrepresentation of facts," saying they were no better than the so-called
terrorists in the opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change, who
authorities say are determined to topple the government. Most of the journalists
work for foreign news organizations, including The Associated Press. "It is now
an open secret," The Herald said, "that these reporters are not only distorting
the facts but are assisting terrorists who stand accused in our courts of law of
abduction, torture and murder by covering up and misrepresenting the brutal
deeds of the terrorists." "We would like them to know that we agree with
President Bush that anyone who in any way finances, harbors or defends
terrorists is himself a terrorist," the newspaper continued. "We, too, will not
make any difference between terrorists and their friends or supporters."
The government says members of the Movement for Democratic
Change abducted Mr. Nkala and strangled him with his own shoelaces on Nov. 5 to
avenge the killing of Patrick Nabanyama, an opposition member who disappeared
before the parliamentary elections in June 2000. Opposition party officials
acknowledge that Mr. Nkala was widely believed to have been behind Mr.
Nabanyama's disappearance, but they deny any involvement in Mr. Nkala's death.
The officials say they believe Mr. Nkala was killed by his own colleagues
because he was preparing to disclose the involvement of other government
supporters in Mr. Nabanyama's death. "The society that the government seeks to
create is one based on fear that is maintained through violence and oppression,"
Welshman Ncube, the secretary general of the Movement for Democratic Change,
said in a statement this week. "What Zimbabweans need are jobs, education for
their children, health facilities and peace. These require a well- thought
program of action, not intimidation or brutality."
From The Guardian (UK), 24
November
I won't be cowed by threats, our man
in Harare vows
Andrew Meldrum
The news that President Robert Mugabe's government wants to
treat me and five other journalists as terrorists comes as a shock but hardly a
surprise. It is shocking because the allegation that a small corps of
correspondents, who have worked under difficult circumstances to report
accurately Zimbabwe's economic and political crisis, support terrorists is
outrageous. On the other hand the accusation can be no surprise to us, because
the Mugabe government has already amply demonstrated that it will use any means
to silence an independent or critical voice. I went to Zimbabwe shortly after
independence in 1980 to write about its successes as a multiracial democracy. I
began writing for the Guardian in 1983 after its correspondent was expelled for
reporting on the Matabeleland massacres, in which the army killed an estimated
20,000 civilians. Now, because I am writing about the country's struggle to
maintain a multiparty democracy and the most basic elements of the rule of law,
I am branded a terrorist. It is galling.
The foreign correspondents in Zimbabwe have reported on
numerous human rights abuses, the state-sponsored murders of some 50 opposition
supporters in the past year and the torture of many more, rampant corruption,
and the government's involvement in the costly Congo war. >My work has caused
me some trouble before. Recently I have been threatened by gangs of Mr Mugabe's
war veterans. Most dramatically, when I was covering a peace march in Harare
last year, I was knocked to the ground by a large chunk of cement hurled at my
head by a war veteran. A policeman standing next to me took no action. I was
lucky to escape with minor cuts and bruising. During the parliamentary elections
in June last year I and two other journalists went into rural Mberengwa to
investigate reports that opposition supporters were being beaten, tortured and
killed. We interviewed a man who showed us where his buttocks had been flayed
from his body. His brother had been killed during the same torture session. Soon
afterwards we were surrounded by government supporters who threatened us;
luckily, we managed to escape. I am proud that the photo I took, although
thought too graphic to be used in the Guardian, has been used in court as
evidence of torture by Zanu PF.
Zimbabwean reporters covering the same issues have paid a heavy
price for their work. Mark Chavunduka and Ray Choto were kidnapped and tortured
by agents of the central intelligence organisation because they dared to report
on dissent in the army against the Congo war. Now the government apparently
wants to turn on the foreign press, because our reports have encouraged growing
international pressure. Despite the increasingly repressive atmosphere, I love
my life in Zimbabwe. I still believe that a multiracial society, where a decent
standard of living is available to all people, is possible. I am currently out
of Zimbabwe to attend a family funeral. But I will return soon. To stay away
would suggest that I believe there is a shred of evidence for these charges.
Those who are trying to silence the press would consider that a victory and it
would make life even more difficult for those who remain. I cannot agree to
that.