The Telegraph
By David Blair in Johannesburg and Hilary Clarke in Rome
(Filed:
17/10/2005)
President Robert Mugabe flew to Rome in defiance of a
European Union travel
ban after the United Nations caused outrage by
inviting him to address a
conference on world hunger today.
Zimbabwe,
once the bread basket of southern Africa and a major exporter of
food, now
depends on western aid to avoid starvation.
Four million Zimbabweans, a
third of the population, need supplies from the
World Food
Programme.
Critics of the Harare regime are appalled that the UN's Food
and
Agricultural Organisation (FAO), whose mission statement is "helping to
build a world without hunger", invited Mr Mugabe to address a conference in
Rome marking its 60th anniversary.
Tony Hall, the US ambassador to
the UN food organisations in Rome, said: "My
government is excited about the
FAO event which is organised to remind
people about hunger.
"However
my feeling is we shouldn't be inviting someone who has absolutely
turned his
back on the poor in his own country. He has made a mockery about
the hungry
and everyone should be upset about this."
Mr Hall said that since 2002
the US had donated almost $300 million [£169
million] in food aid to
Zimbabwe.
He visited the country when the regime was engaged in
bulldozing large areas
of the poorest black townships.
This campaign,
personally ordered by Mr Mugabe, destroyed the homes or
livelihoods of
700,000 people and harmed another 2.4 million, according to a
UN
report.
A spokesman for the Foreign Office said: "Going to Rome to
celebrate World
Food Day whilst millions of ordinary Zimbabweans face food
shortages as a
direct result of his flawed policies simply emphasise
Mugabe's skewed sense
of priorities."
Zimbabwe's transformation from
self-sufficiency to dependency coincided with
Mr Mugabe's seizure of
white-owned farms.
He blames food shortages on drought. But critics say
hunger is the direct
and predictable result of his policies.
Tendai
Biti, from the leadership of Zimbabwe's opposition Movement for
Democratic
Change, also criticised the UN invitation.
"It's a tragedy," he said.
"Inviting Mugabe sends exactly the wrong signal.
He has completely destroyed
the economic and agricultural fabric of this
country.
"The UN
shouldn't play ping-pong with the suffering of the Zimbabwean
people." An
FAO spokesman said that as a member "in good standing" with the
agency Mr
Mugabe was invited to attend.
"The UN does things sometimes," said Mr
Hall. "They roll over backwards to
try to be fair but someone like this
really makes a mockery of what we are
about."
Mugabe, a Roman
Catholic, last travelled to Rome for Pope John Paul II's
funeral when he
embarrassed the Prince of Wales, reaching across to shake
the royal hand
during the service.
Mr Mugabe accepted the FAO's invitation on Friday and
will speak at the
organisation's headquarters.
He seizes any
opportunity to visit the western world and defy a travel ban
imposed on him
by the EU.
This measure, introduced in 2002, supposedly prevents Mr
Mugabe and 94 other
members of his regime from visiting any member state. A
similar ban is in
force in America.
Yet Mr Mugabe repeatedly exploits
a significant loophole.
The travel ban does not apply to UN functions
because these are held to be
above the jurisdiction of any individual state.
So Mr Mugabe has frequently
visited New York to address UN
summits.
He uses these occasions to denounce his western critics and
blame them for
Zimbabwe's food shortage.
In June, Zimbabwe's state
press blamed Britain for Africa's dry weather and
claimed that Tony Blair
was using "chemical weapons" to cause droughts and
famines across the
continent.
Today he can be expected to seize the opportunity to make
another attack on
the Prime Minister and the "western imperialists" who are,
apparently,
obsessed with overthrowing his bankrupt regime.
Irish Independent
ZIMBABWE President Robert Mugabe's arrival in Rome on Saturday
for the
anniversary of the UN food agency has sparked criticism from the
agency's US
ambassador and Italian officials, who say his policies have
helped starve
his people.
Mugabe, who is exempt from an EU travel ban
when on UN business, may address
the Food and Agriculture Organisation today
(FAO), during its 60th
anniversary celebrations. .The FAO's US Ambassador
Tony Hall was personally
"amazed" that Mugabe had been invited.
"The
US government is disheartened that President Mugabe, who is responsible
for
growing hunger in his own country, has decided to attend the event," a
spokeswoman for Mr Hall added.
Mugabe blames Zimbabwe's economic
crisis on sanctions it says are organised
by former colonial power Britain
in retribution for Harare's policy of
redistributing land to poor black
farmers.
The EU imposed travel sanctions on Zimbabwean government
officials after
accusations of vote rigging in parliamentary polls in 2000
and in Mugabe's
re-election two years later.
"The red carpet will be
stained with the blood of the poor people who are
dying of hunger and thirst
in Africa," Italian senator Sergio Agroni, a
leader of parliament's
agriculture commission said.
The FAO's spokesman said Mugabe would have
the opportunity to address FAO
Director-General Jacques Diouf and a news
conference later today.
Mugabe, a Roman Catholic, made headlines on his
last visit to Rome for Pope
John Paul II's funeral when he reached across to
shake Britain's Prince
Charles hand during the service.
Email: jag@mango.zw;
justiceforagriculture@zol.co.zw
Please
send any material for publication in the Open Letter Forum to
jag@mango.zw with "For Open Letter Forum" in the
subject
line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter
1:
To the self-righteous Scot [GGG] - OLF no. 387
Your letter begs
many questions:-
1. Have you ever been to Africa or lived in
Zimbabwe?
2. Do you think the land has been given to `poor black landless
peasants'?
3. Do you know for a fact that there were no land reform
programmes after
Independence in 1980?
4. Is your `beef' with the Brits,
Ian Smith, the white farmers or
Zimbabwean whites in general?
5. Do you
think all white farmers were `given' or `stole' their land?
Maybe you could
investigate how many farms were bought after 1980
Independence, with
government approval.
6. Poverty and Aids are `real issues' in Zimbabwe at
present, more than
landlessness.
7. Do you think Zimbabwe is a cluttered
little island like the UK and there
is no land for everyone? You can drive
from one end to the other and see
vast tracts of uninhabited land.
8. Do
you think all white farmers have not acknowledged their past mistakes
and
have not tried to make amends or reforms or changes?
9. You mention Charles I
and his beheading but you say you are a `strong
supporter of non violence',
who are you warning, we who are in danger of
`becoming extinct'? There's
only one person on my guillotine wishlist!
10. Can you please get me a
British passport, so that I can sit securely on
another continent and while
away my time trying to solve problems of which
I know virtually
nothing?
Rochelle
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter
2:
Dear Mr Chappell,
Please may I have the privilege of answering
the very first question you
ask in your last letter? "Well what can I say,"
My advice would be, say
nothing. Your 25 year old naivety is a dead
give-away, living on mud-island
and having been adequately brainwashed via
the myriad, and sometimes
pathetic media renditions of the true nature of
Zimbabwe/Rhodesia
realities, then and now. I get your point though,
bootlicking and
ring-shining just might score you enough points to be given a
farm instead
of having to "invest" in one. Throw in a few quid for the fat
geysers to
prove you're politically correct.
I shouldn't warn you, but
when the colour of your skin is deemed enough
reason to have your piece of
land appropriated by some hierarchical thief
after you've slaved blood, sweat
and tears, if you know what those are of
course, to make it productive, and
without the sickly politics as a motive,
make sure that you've kept your
mud-patch intact. By the way, haven't heard
from your Uncle Andy Capp lately.
Please give him my regards.
The
Vicar
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter
3:
I would like to know what Stuart Chappell`s thoughts are regarding the
USA,
Australia, New Zealand etc.
Should he/we be starting our own
serious reform on behalf of all the poor
displaced Native Americans,
Aborigines and Moirés. Remember, these poor
peoples all had their land
forcibly taken from them. Do we now campaign
for all the White land to be
nationalised?
Where do we draw the line? Send a quarter of the current
English settlers
in the UK back to France, Scandinavia, Germany etc, from
whence they
originated.
A very good perspective of Southern
Africa,(before the wheel) can be gained
from reading the books of the early
hunters and explorers of Africa.
Africa has been introduced to the wheel, but
chooses to discard
it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter
4:
Dear JAG,
I am afraid I feel I have to respond to the white
British citizen wishing
to purchase property in the Zimbabwe, Stuart
Chappell. I really do think
you should stop looking down your nose at those
white farmers. You are
just showing your British traits of thinking your
knowledge is superior to
those people who actually live in a situation of
which you have no
experience. Not all whites in Zimbabwe are or were
farmers. I am not a
farmer, and although privately educated, I was not in a
financial position
to buy my own property due to the cost of living. My
father was a white
lawyer (God forbid for being white) and practised in
Mutare and Harare.
He did pro bono work to the detriment of his family to
assist the poor
black brethren and represented terrorists during the war as
he believed
every human being has a right to a defence. Stop criticising and
judging
those white farmers. Some of them have done incredibly good works
which
include providing free education, free clinics and medical health
and
provided them homes. The alternate for them was to starve, which they
are
doing now as they are displaced. There are no social benefits in
Zimbabwe
from the government. Africa has done nothing for my family although
we are
white. My parents are 'retired' penniless due to inflation and
because
they are honest and won't wheel and deal which is what people have to
do to
now to survive. They have always paid their taxes which many
Zimbabweans
of all colours avoid. My parents are well educated and fine
people, a
credit to Zimbabwe - Zimbabwe had done nothing for them; it has
not
provided them with opulent wealth of which you talk. Zimbabwe
needs
supporting and caring people in its time of terror and not your
overbearing
anti colonial snobbery.
Kind regards
White Skin African
Soul
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter
5:
Dear Jag,
Future successful agricultural exploitation in
Zimbabwe will depend upon
sound education and training of farmers and
agronomists. The current and
recurrent political and economic situation in
the country is a serious
antidote to educational development. Why is it that,
so far, very little is
being discussed about the health of higher education
in Zimbabwe in the
media? What is happening to thousands of high school
graduates who are
unable to go to college because they cannot afford
multimillion dollars in
fees.
Could someone please share the research
on this subject and, if none
exists, I suggest that one is warranted. Only
through valid information can
help be found for them.
MANAMA -
USA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter
6:
Dear Stuart Campbell,
I do so hope that you come to Zimbabwe
soon, and buy some land for farming
(lease is a better word). Bring all your
pounds and invest in the farm, and
when it is up and running, I hope that
your farm will be taken away from
you, as mine was. This will be very
generous of you, and I can't wait for
you to come and help Zimbabwe this
way.
Yours,
sarcastic ex-farmer, now
destitute
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter
7:
Dear Jag,
Please pass this on to Stuart Chappell.....
I
have a property he is welcome to purchase, as long as he will pay
the
equivalent of a same size property in the UK and in "pounds" Feel
free,
walk in walk out!!!! He will be assured of a truly Zimbabwean
experience
and a wonderful learning curve in the reality of life in
Zimbabwe.
Pensioner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Letter
8:
Dear Jag,
Whilst we are all concerned about the food security
situation at the
present, what should be of even greater concern is the
situation regarding
the 2005/2006 agricultural season.
I have just
been on 2 separate trips, one by air and another by road
through different
areas on private business. I travelled through some of
the Chinhoyi, Banket,
Mutorashanga, Raffingora, Mvurwi, Guruve, Mazowe
Valley, Kadoma, Chakari
& Karoi farming areas. The devastation is
heartbreaking, and plain to
see by anyone who travels these roads. The
tiny and scattered wheat crop is
probably not worth the costs of combining.
There has been, at a guess, 5% of
the land Preparation done for the coming
season. There was One irrigated
tobacco crop seen. (This should have been
in at the beginning of
September!!)
Coming home on Sunday there were scores of obviously weekend
farmers going
home to Harare after spending the weekend "Farming" in their
fancy VX
wagons or Double Cabs.
Is there anyone out there in a
position of authority who is aware that we
have missed the boat (again) for
the coming season?
The international press and the donor community should
be inundated with a
mass of information telling them of the impending train
smash!!
Are the donor community aware that they are going to be feeding
double the
number Zimbabweans through to April/May 2007?
There are
scores of small chicken and piggery projects being started,
obviously some
bureaucrat has recently had a bright idea and the ministry
is lending money
for these projects to the said weekend farmers? What are
these poor animals
going to eat? There will not be enough food to feed the
people, never mind
the animals, and where are these weekenders going to get
the fuel to visit
their "Musha" every weekend to take the requisite feed?
It does not
matter how much money Gideon Gono is prepared to throw at the
New Settlers,
the coming season will be a complete failure, and it is
imperative that the
donors are made aware of this fact. South Africa will
need to grow another
huge crop and donate all the food if starvation is to
be averted this time
next year.
I am in absolute awe and wonder at the total incompetence
being displayed
to anyone who drives down the roads of the formerly
productive farming
areas of Zimbabwe.
The political parties are going
to be focused on the coming Senate
elections and this will cause even more
disruptions and divert even more of
the scant resources from the agricultural
sector at a vital time.
In the coming months even more of the people who are
already starving are
going to have to prove their party loyalty before being
given food.
The situation that all of us still in Zimbabwe who are
economically able to
withstand the coming crisis is going to be very
interesting.
The effect on the vast majority of our people who are unable
to cope with
the impending devastation is going to be
catastrophic.
John
Kinnaird
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All
letters published on the open Letter Forum are the views and opinions
of the
submitters, and do not represent the official viewpoint of Justice
for
Agriculture.
New Zimbabwe
By Staff
Reporter
Last updated: 10/17/2005 13:09:56
PRESIDENT Robert Mugabe was
last night branded "heartless" after he
commandeered a London-bound Air
Zimbabwe plane to the Italian capital Rome,
sparking a four-hour wait for
hundreds of passengers after the plane ran out
fuel.
Air Zimbabwe has
been forced to cancel several domestic, regional and
international flights
due to a crippling fuel shortage and the company's
terrible track record of
failing to pay for refueling and landing fees at
airports around the
world.
Mugabe and his entourage flew into a political storm in Rome
Saturday where
he was invited by the United Nations. The United States said
it was "amazed"
by the UN agencies' decision to invite the 81-year-old
leader who is banned
from travel throughout the European Union, although he
can attend UN events.
Furious passengers told New Zimbabwe.com how Mugabe
and his group forced a
deviation in the plane's route, a decision which led
to a four-hour
grounding of the plane after Air Zimbabwe failed to pay soon
after a
refueling had been done.
"It seems Air Zimbabwe were afraid
to tell Mugabe that the fuel would not
complete the journey," said a
passenger on the plane. "Frankly, I was pissed
off that our journey was
altered to suite Mugabe only to see him dump us on
an airport
tarmac."
Another passenger confirmed seeing refueling trucks approaching
the plane.
He described dramatic scenes of seeing the plane's captain
angrily
remonstrating with one of the men who did the refueling.
"For
long periods, we were just being told there was a problem. The nature
of the
problem was not revealed to us," said the passenger who cannot be
named.
"Many people thought Mugabe had caused the problem, if not
politically, at
least by having diverted the plane and the fuel question was
never far from
people's lips. Watching the captain arguing with the airport
guy, we were
pretty much convinced at that point that Air Zimbabwe had not
paid for
refueling.
"I got the sense that the plane's captain was
just a pawn in a grand game.
It was heartless for Mugabe and the Air
Zimbabwe people to expose him the
way they did."
It was not the first
time an Air Zimbabwe flight had been grounded after Air
Zimbabwe failed to
settle its bill. Last month, we exclusively revealed how
flights to Harare
from London were temporarily suspended after a plane was
grounded by airport
authorities over non-payment landing fees.
Aviation experts have
expressed fears that the severe foreign currency
shortages in Zimbabwe have
forced Air Zimbabwe to "cut corners" after
failing to buy spares and
properly service their planes thereby threatening
passenger
safety.
The airliner has also come under fire for running unproductive
routes
tailored to reflect Mugabe's 'Look East' policy. Early last month,
the
airliner embarrassingly admitted flying only three passengers on its
Bangkok-Dubai route.
The Air Zimbabwe spokesman was unavailable to
comment last night.
Business Day
Posted to the web on: 17 October 2005
Dumisani Muleya
Harare
Correspondent
LEADER of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC) Morgan
Tsvangirai insisted at the weekend he was still firmly in
charge, despite
clear signs a split in the party was
deepening.
The rift in the MDC became clear after a vote last
Wednesday on whether to
participate in the November 26 senate election, seen
widely as yet another
institution set up by President Robert Mugabe to
entrench his power.
The vote went 33 to 31 in favour of joining the
senate elections, with two
spoilt votes, while the party's provinces earlier
voted six to four in
favour of participation.
After Wednesday's
count, Tsvangirai said he would use his authority as party
leader to push
through the boycott vote.
However, MDC deputy secretary-general Gift
Chimanikire sent a memo on
Thursday to party structures to start selecting
candidates for the senate
election. Tsvangirai wrote to the Zimbabwe
Electoral Commission on Friday,
asking the body to reject nomination papers
for MDC candidates. He said his
party had decided to boycott the
poll.
Meanwhile, the ruling Zanu (PF) was
celebrating the MDC infighting between
Tsvangiria against party
secretary-general Welshman Ncube which may mark the
end of the opposition
party.
The MDC almost defeated Zanu (PF) in the crucial 2000
parliamentary and 2002
presidential elections. It has challenged the results
of elections since
then, claiming the ruling party rigged successive
polls.
Mugabe welcomed the MDC decision to boycott the poll. He said
his party was
not worried about MDC's decision. "They are an irrelevant
party."
The other beneficiary of the MDC internal
strife could be the proposed
United People's Movement, which wants to
recruit senior members from both
Zanu (PF) and the MDC.
Like the
MDC, Zanu (PF) is also reeling from a protracted power struggle
that almost
split the party last year. A break up in Zanu (PF) is still
looming due to
efforts by the party's faction led by luminary Emmerson
Mnangagwa to leave
and fight Zanu (PF) from outside.
Mnangagwa's camp almost seized
power in the run-up to the party's congress
last December, but the palace
coup was foiled at the 11th hour by President
Robert
Mugabe.
Tsvangirai said his main reason for
boycotting the poll was that elections
in the current Zimbabwean environment
"breed illegitimate outcomes".
But MDC legal affairs
secretary David Coltart said the majority of the party's
grassroots support
wanted participation in the election because they are
saying "if we don't
participate we yield ground in areas where Zanu (PF) has
no chance of
winning votes".
Business Day
Posted to the web on: 17 October 2005
Jonathan
Katzenellenbogen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
International
Affairs Editor
PRESIDENT Thabo Mbeki's successor will face the task of
smoothing over the
holes created by Mbeki's policies on Zimbabwe and
HIV/AIDS, says an article
in the next edition of a US foreign policy
journal.
An article to be published in November-December issue of
Foreign Affairs
says the next president, to take power in 2009, will have to
"repair the
damage that Mbeki has done through his misguided approach to
black
empowerment and through his policies on Zimbabwe and
AIDS".
Jeffrey Herbst, provost of Miami University in Ohio, writes in
the quarterly
journal that Mbeki's successor will need to develop "a
political approach
that goes beyond racial solidarity", to fix up the
problems as well as build
on the successes of Mbeki's
administration.
If the ruling African National Congress
(ANC) is to remain relevant, it must
put aside its role as a struggle
organisation. The party must replace "its
primary focus on resistance to
apartheid with greater emphasis on the
development of nonracial politics and
socioeconomic equality".
Herbst, previously at Princeton
University, has often visited SA and
specialises in African affairs. While
the article is critical of the ANC and
the president, it does have strong
words of praise for SA for its
macro-economic stability and
democracy.
He justifies Mbeki's strategy that has seen the creation
of a few
"BEE-llionaries". This tactic, Herbst says, aims "to create an
iconic black
business elite in the hope this will improve the relationship
between his
government and the corporate world, extend the ANC's influence
outside
politics, and help win more investment for
SA".
Empowerment has not spread wealth widely, or encouraged
the black population
into the formal economy. He also criticises a tendency
of Mbeki and the ANC
to lash out at critics by labelling them racist.
New Zimbabwe
By Chejerai
Hove
Last updated: 10/17/2005 13:10:01
THE scene is a country called
Zimbabwe, and the audience, thirteen million
anxious Zimbabweans. The
actors: Zanu-PF and the MDC. The Stage Director,
Robert Gabriel Mugabe. The
title of the play: The Senate Bandwagon.
The Zimbabwean political
audience is once again faced with an ever more
confused political
situation.
A few elections later, the people are rather puzzled as to
what exactly is
happening. President Robert Mugabe has dangled a new carrot,
the Senate. And
one already knows why this carrot is there, in front of the
two political
parties and their faithful. I always wondered why this causes
confusion
because the Senate is supposed to last only a short time. After
all, it was
abolished in 1987 on the pretext that it unnecessarily delayed
urgent
legislation which the government wanted passed the fast-track
way.
With the current series of endless crises, it would seem the need
for urgent
passing of legislation has not died. The land issue is still
fresh and
causing havoc to the economy, the economic mess fraught with so
many other
problems, the decline of services like health, education,
transport. So many
urgent issues!
In the midst of all this, the president
wants to introduce a Senate, an
expensive undertaking which a shrinking
economy can hardly afford.
It is well known now that Mugabe wouldn't care
less if the country was broke
or not, as long as he keeps power till he
dies. So, in order to accommodate
his 'fellows' who had fallen by the
wayside, he decides to introduce a
senate which practically serves no useful
purpose except to give terminal
benefits to his old and sickly friends he
had forgotten to take along on his
gravy train of economic plunder and
electoral fraud.
Then comes the side show: the MDC jumping onto this
worthless project on the
assumption that it might be possible to contain
Zanu-PF in its own game. To
play or not to play the Zanu-PF game? That was
the question facing the
national council of the MDC. Surprisingly, the
outcome was half-half kusenga
kwedhongi.
The meaning of it all is
that to play the game means the MDC accepts the
rules and procedures which
created the game. It also means an endorsement of
the political manoeuvres
which have created the senate, and also an
acceptance of the recent
constitutional amendments as valid. That is what
President Mugabe wants to
happen, realizing that he created this game in
order to dangle a few crumps
and left-overs in order cause a splits in the
MDC and possibly civil
society. Mugabe's project seems to be advancing
without any hitches, so
far.
As far as I can see, the problem of the MDC started when they
participated
in the parliamentary elections whose results were already
predicted and
known. Now, members of the opposition are in parliament, but
not all who
wanted to be there. Those who could not make it to parliament
would argue
that the current MDC members of the august house are enjoying
the benefits
of the gravy train while denying others the opportunity to do
so in the new
Senate. That is the problem facing the MDC. They have allowed
themselves to
taste of the niceties offered by the devil, and everyone wants
their piece
of the carrot. Exactly what Mugabe and Zanu-PF wants, especially
in these
hard times of economic collapse and struggles for
survival!
Everyone wants to put bread and butter on the table, never mind
the source!
As far as I can see, wrapped inside the carrot, Mr Mugabe and
his party
gurus have thrown a live snake in the house of the opposition.
Some from the
opposition camp only see the skin of the carrot, while others
have the
vision to see the snake within. Thus, the opposition party begins
its own
demise fired by the energies and skills of Mr Mugabe's camp. The
audience,
we ordinary Zimbabweans, can only look and wonder whether the
opposition is
serious about participating in a Senate whose introduction it
strongly
opposed not so long ago.
Having participated in the
formation and running of several national
organisations, I have come to
accept that the Zimbabwean disease is one and
only one in terms of
organisational management. Once an institution is
formed, the next crucial
task for some Zimbabweans is to find as many
reasons and ways as possible to
tear it apart. Some people call it
factionalism. Others call it
'splinterism'. What I know is that both are
usually not based on any basic
principle or vision. They are usually based
on some flimsy excuse and
rampant opportunism, a national malaise in the
affairs of our country. All
the noble reasons underlying the formation of
the organisation are soon
forgotten. Every one for himself, and God for none
of us! It is sad that the
MDC is split and probably destroyed over a
worthless carrot (Senate) dangled
in front of them.
Every citizen can see clearly that the Senate serves no
useful purpose
except to function as some kind of old-age pension and
gratuity for Mugabe's
loyalists and friends. Everyone knows who the new
senators will be: old men
and women discarded by either design or mistake by
the Mugabe gravy train.
Why anyone with a national vision and some kind of
realization of where the
country is going should join, I have no clue. In
the end it also becomes a
question of personal integrity and dignity.
Zimbabweans are used to national
abuse, especially by the ruining party,
Zanu-PF.
Sadly, it seems the MDC, having raised people's hopes, has also
now embarked
on this national malaise of thinking that they can earn good
salaries from a
national purse which does not exist. They can join the dance
of Zanu-PF
pensioners and then wake up in the morning to call themselves the
opposition. In Shona it is called 'kudziya moto wembavha'.(Warming
themselves from the fireplace of a thief).
As the Zimbabwean disease
of splits and factions engulfs the political realm
of the country, the decay
continues, and more political parties will be
formed in order to split again
and again while Mugabe continues to destroy
the country. The national vision
dies, only to be replaced by financial
greed and illusions of boundless
power. In the end, national political
fatigue creeps in, and no one wants to
vote for anyone, knowing only too
well that there is no Zimbabwean
politician interested in shaping a genuine
national vision devoid of greed
for power and money.
Chenjerai Hove is a Zimbabwean writer and poet
Cape Times
October 17, 2005
By Peter
Fabricius
President Thabo Mbeki apparently intends to snub the
Commonwealth by
not attending its heads of government summit in Malta next
month. He is
sending his new deputy in his place.
He still
seems to be in a high sulk over his defeats at the last
summit in Abuja two
years ago. Zimbabwe had been suspended from the
Commonwealth after it deemed
President Robert Mugabe had cheated his victory
in presidential elections in
March 2002.
Mbeki believed that the suspension was only for a year
and that
Zimbabwe should be re-admitted to the club at Abuja. He fought a
running
battle with then Commonwealth chairman John Howard, the Australian
prime
minister, and Commonwealth secretary-general Don McKinnon in the
run-up to
Abuja.
But he lost. The Commonwealth leaders remained
adamant that Mugabe had
done nothing to deserve re-admission and Zimbabwe
pulled out of the club in
a huff when it realised it would remain suspended.
To add insult to Mbeki's
injury, the Sri Lankan foreign minister Lakshman
Kadirgamar, whom Mbeki had
put up to oust McKinnon from the top executive
post, was resoundingly
defeated in the summit elections for that
post.
What made it all worse for Mbeki is that he apparently
misjudged the
racial dynamics of the Commonwealth. Most of its members are
"black" and the
anti-Mugabe sentiment mostly emanated from the few "white"
members. So Mbeki
seemed to think the voting on both issues would go with
race. But it didn't.
In the Pacific and Caribbean, where most
Commonwealth members inhabit
specks in the ocean, the argument was not
persuasive. Even in Africa, it
didn't play quite as expected. The summit
host, Nigerian President Olusegun
Obasanjo, in particular, didn't play ball,
not least because he did not want
Zimbabwe to spoil his summit.
The unfortunate Kadirgamar, who was apparently very resentful that he
had
been persuaded to stand for the secretary-generalship on grounds of
exaggerated support, was incidentally assassinated, apparently by Tamil
Tigers, in his capital Colombo earlier this year.
Mbeki
went on his worst internet rant ever after Abuja, coming within
a whisker of
supporting Mugabe's land grab and accusing the British of
opposing Mugabe
only because he had kicked their "kith and kin" off their
land.
Commonwealth officials have pointed out that it is quite unusual for a
head
of government not to attend a summit. These are supposed to be quite
intimate affairs where the leaders go off on a weekend retreat to solve the
problems of the world in frank and confidential conversation.
Mbeki's absence will surely be interpreted in many quarters as undue
support
for Mugabe - and that will act as an antidote to the good local and
international publicity he has gained by trying to impose some economic and
political discipline on him, as a condition for receiving a bail-out loan
from South Africa.
This was a good move. But Mbeki pins way too
much hope on such quiet,
behind-the-scenes diplomacy. There are no signs
that Mugabe will accept such
a conditional loan. Yet Mbeki's strategy seems
to be that everyone must
stand back while he personally tries to reason with
the man.
That's a big gamble. There may be some use for the "good
cop" in
dealing with Mugabe, but there is also clearly a place for the "bad
cop".
And by boycotting the Commonwealth, Mbeki is surely going a little too
far
to convince Mugabe that he is the good cop.
Incidentally,
you could make a case for missing the summit because the
Commonwealth is an
irrelevant anachronism. But not if you fought tooth and
nail two years ago
to get Mugabe re-admitted to it.