The ZIMBABWE Situation | Our
thoughts and prayers are with Zimbabwe - may peace, truth and justice prevail. |
The sources said
Obasanjo wanted to prevent a major "Zimbabwe row in his
backyard" that could
split the 54-member grouping along political or
regional
lines.
This comes against a background of reports of further
deterioration in the
situation on the ground in Zimbabwe. Political violence
and repression
remain pervasive while economic implosion deepens, re-cent
surveys submitted
to Commonwealth leaders and diplomats point
out.
A report by regional church leaders released last Friday
revealed that Zanu
PF youth brigades were still perpetrating acts of violence
across the
country. Representatives of the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum
this week
told Commonwealth high commissioners in London that there has been
no
change - except for the worse - in the country.
However, it is
understood Obasanjo is planning to bury the Zimbabwe issue
which threatens to
create wide fissures in the normally tranquil edifice of
Commonwealth
consensus.
"The Nigerians are working very hard to ensure that
Zimbabwe does not become
the main issue at Abuja," a well-placed source said.
"All contacts by
Obasanjo and his officials are geared mostly to ensuring
that there are no
contentious issues on the table."
Sources said
Obasanjo, who sits on the Commonwealth troika on Zimbabwe with
South African
President Thabo Mbeki and Australian Prime Minister John
Howard, has ordered
his foreign ministry, which is preparing the groundwork
for Chogm, to prevent
Zimbabwe becoming the main bone of contention in
Abuja. Mbeki is supporting
the Nigerian leader's efforts.
"Obasanjo has instructed his foreign
ministry to ensure that by the time
Abuja comes there will already have been
such progress in dealing with the
matter that it will not be an issue," the
source said.
"He believes the Zimbabwe issue could wreck 'his'
conference. There may be
some noise about the issue right now but I can tell
you, and I know this,
the Nigerians want Zimbabwe to vanish from the
agenda."
Efforts to get comment from Nigerian High Commissioner
Wil-berforce Juta
were unsuccessful.
Zimbabwe was suspended from
the Commonwealth on March 19 last year following
fraud and political violence
in President Robert Mugabe's disputed
re-election. Harare is, however, trying
to get the ban lifted in Abuja.
That will require the ruling party to
make progress in its talks with the
opposition Movement for Democratic
Change.
During its suspension, Zimbabwe was asked to address the
club's various
concerns. These include political dialogue and reconciliation;
electoral law
reforms and other fundamental legislative changes; promotion,
in
collaboration with the UNDP, of an organised land reform exercise;
human
rights issues and the economic crisis.
But as Commonwealth
secretary-general Don McKinnon's report states, and the
Zimbabwe Human Rights
NGO Forum reinforces in its report released this week,
Harare is in clear
breach of the Commonwealth's Harare Declaration, the
Millbrook Commonwealth
Action Programme on the Harare Declaration and the
Abuja Agreement signed in
Nigeria on September 6 2001 in a bid to end the
local crisis.
"The
evidence available at pre-sent indicates that Zimbabwe remains
divergent to
the Common-wealth goal of 'promoting democracy and good
governance, human
rights and the rule of law, gender equality and
sustainable econo-mic and
social development'," the forum's report says.
It said Harare has
also failed to comply with the Marlborough House
Statement on Zimbabwe,
through which the country was suspended, and the
Zimbabwe Mid-Term Review
Statement issued by the troika in Abuja on
September 23 last
year.
"Electoral processes in Zimbabwe continue to be conducted in an
environment
in which citizens are unable to participate freely," the report
says. "They
are persistently subjected to violence, intimidation and
coercion. High
levels of human rights violations continue to
prevail."
It went further: "There has been continued disregard for
the rule of law and
manipulation of the judiciary that has compromised equal
access to justice.
This has been accompanied by the establishment of a
culture of impunity
presided over by a seemingly partisan police
force."
On the economy, it said: "Economic decline has accelerated as
a result of
mismanagement, coupled with engagement in an unsustainable land
reform
programme that has only served to aggravate food insecurity in the
country."
Zim Independent
Mugabe's missing 11m ha
Itai Dzamara
DESPITE
persistent claims by government that it has resettled 300 000
families under
the land reform A1 model, the Presidential Land Review
Committee's report
submitted yesterday revealed that less than half that
number of families have
in fact been resettled.
Sources privy to the report, which President
Robert Mugabe officially
received from chairman of the committee Charles
Utete at State House
yesterday, said it exposed as false the claim that 300
000 families had been
resettled.
Only about 130 000 families have
been allocated land, it reveals.
The report also says government and Zanu
PF officials have in many cases
seized several farms each whilst depriving
ordinary people of land.
Resettlement figures were exaggerated to justify
the grabbing of large
tracts of land, much of which is currently lying
idle.
Of the 11 million hectares of land acquired by the government
for
resettlement, less than four million hectares have been allocated
to
peasants, sources said.
"The report identified that about 130
000 families were resettled under the
fast track scheme," said a
source.
"It further identified the process whereby government and
ruling party
officials helped themselves to farms whilst figures were
inflated of
families that were resettled."
In his first response
to the report recently, Mugabe gave his officials a
two-week ultimatum to
surrender extra farms and remain with one each.
Special Affairs
Minister John Nkomo, who also reportedly has more than one
farm, has said
some officials were now surrendering surplus farms.
"These figures
were being compiled starting from the district level up to
the provincial
level," another source said. "It was therefore easy to claim
a certain number
of families as having been resettled on a number of farms,
including those
taken over by chefs."
Since August last year, when government claimed
to have concluded the
violence-ridden fast track scheme, there have been
queries over figures
provided for resettled families.
Sources said
that one of the focal points of the Utete team was to verify
the figures,
hence the discovery of the inflating of figures as well as
multiple farm
ownership by chefs.
The Presidential Land Review report is understood
to have recommended
government revisit the fast track scheme, recover looted
farms and allocate
them to deserving peasants in order to establish some
respectability in the
agrarian reform programme.
The area of
productivity was also highlighted in the report, with the low
uptake of land
by beneficiaries seen as perpetuating the food deficit in the
country.
Zim Independent
Govt's food u-turn follows heavy diplomatic
pressure
Augustine Mukaro/Blessing Zulu
GOVERNMENT'S reversal of its
policy on food relief distribution was as a
result of heavy diplomatic
pressure from the United Nations bodies handling
humanitarian aid to
Zimbabwe, it has been learnt.
Diplomatic sources said the United Nations
Development Programme resident
representative and humanitarian co-ordinator,
Victor Angelo, and World Food
Programme director in Zimbabwe, Kevin Farrell,
put immense pressure on
government to review its directive that food aid
should only be channelled
through government structures.
Their
pressure was complemented by donors' threats to stop humanitarian
assistance
if government had enforced the new policy.
"Angelo and Farrell met
with the Minister of Public Service, Labour and
Social Welfare, July Moyo
over the subject," a diplomat said.
"The minister gave assurances
that there are no significant changes in the
system of food aid distribution
already in place and that NGOs should
continue their work in co-ordination
with local government structures.
"Moyo reiterated that the current
system of food aid distribution is
functioning
satisfactorily."
The Zimbabwe Humanitarian Situation Report released
last week said the WFP
regional director raised the issue with President
Robert Mugabe who
reaffirmed previous assurances that food aid would not be
used for political
purposes.
"It was stressed that WFP's
implementing partners continue to be considered
responsible and accountable
for the food up to the point of handover to
beneficiaries," the report
says.
"WFP is hoping to finalise with government the Memorandum of
Understanding
(MOU) for the emergency operation for 2003/2004. WFP considers
this MOU
essential to ensure that food aid distributions can proceed based
on
vulnerability only," the report says.
Last week donors also
asked for clarification on the controversial issue.
Donors want the food
distribution process to continue as it has been in the
past - for the process
to be transparent and the beneficiary lists to be
determined in public
non-political meetings.
"All were unanimous, politicisation of food
aid would not be acceptable.
They commended WFP's policy of zero tolerance of
politicisation of food aid
and insisted that this be the basis for future
support," the report said.
The backtrack comes after government
closed UN Relief and Recovery Unit
field offices in
mid-August.
Government alleged that not all procedures for the
establishment of this
field presence had been properly followed resulting in
UN field staff being
recalled to Harare.
The provincial field
units are mandated to provide support to provincial and
district level
co-ordination structures in the humanitarian fields. They are
also supposed
to monitor, from an independent perspective, assistance
provided with donor
resources.
Zim Independent
Ex-Noczim boss in Libya as police net spreads
Itai
Dzamara
NATIONAL Oil Company of Zimbabwe (Noczim) former chief executive
officer,
Webster Muriritirwa, has left the country and is believed to be in
Libya
where he will take up a post with Tamoil amid police investigations
into the
Noczim fuel saga.
Muriritirwa, who left Noczim under a cloud
at the end of last month, is
understood to be in Libya to join
Tamoil.
A relative of Muriritirwa who spoke on condition of anonymity
said he left
the country for Libya but claimed to be unaware of his mission
there.
"He is out of the country. Yes, he is in Libya," said the
relative. "I am
not aware of his mission there."
A senior source
at Noczim said Muriritirwa's links with Tamoil were
established during visits
to this country by the Libyan firm's officials as
well as when Noczim
officials visited Libya.
Tamoil has been supplying Noczim with fuel
for the past three years before
their deal collapsed due to failure by the
Zimbabwe government to pay its
debts.
"He (Muriritirwa) left for
Libya about three weeks ago. We have no doubt
about that," said the Noczim
source. "His relationship with Tamoil was
established over the past two years
when he paid visits to Libya, which we
understand culminated in a deal being
clinched."
Muriritirwa resigned from Noczim at the end of last month
after what sources
described as a "gruelling battle" with government over the
fuel crisis and
the collapse of the Tamoil deal.
"His
relationships with Energy minister (Amos) Midzi had reached a low ebb
and was
characterised by accusations and counter-accusations," said a
source. The
source added that irregularities in the Noczim/Tamoil deal had
also caused a
clash between government and Noczim officials.
Meanwhile, it emerged
this week that Muriritirwa could be forced to return
to assist investigations
as government intensifies its crackdown at Noczim.
Energy ministry
sources said a probe into the parastatal's operations over
the past two years
had revealed serious anomalies of officials leaking fuel
onto the black
market in connivance with top government and Zanu
PF
officials.
Muriritirwa was appointed Noczim chief in 2000 to
take over from Nicholas
Ncube who moved to the Ministry of
Finance.
Police spokesman Wayne Bvudzijena said yesterday that
investigations into
the parastatal as well as individuals were
continuing.
"Investigations continue as we receive more information.
However, I don't
have anything to provide so far," said
Bvudzijena.
Midzi could not be reached for comment this week.
Zim Independent
MDC briefs Mkapa
Dumisani Muleya
OPPOSITION
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) secretary-general Welshman
Ncube and his
party delegation this week widened their diplomatic offensive
to include East
Africa.
Ncube met Tanzanian president Benjamin Mkapa, the sitting
Southern Africa
Development Community (Sadc) chair, in Dar es Salaam on
Tuesday to brief him
on the situation in Zimbabwe.
"We met
President Mkapa and discussed the situation in Zimbabwe. It was a
good
meeting in which we exchanged views in a friendly atmosphere,"
Ncube
said.
"Our objective is to brief regional leaders on what is
happening in Zimbabwe
from our own perspective. We were not there (Tanzania)
to quarrel with the
Sadc position or to counter Zanu PF views but to give our
own account of the
situation."
Ncube said Mkapa emphasised there
was no way out of the crisis except
through negotiations between the MDC and
Zanu PF.
"President Mkapa even referred to the Tanzanian situation
after the election
in 2000 and how they resolved their crisis through
dialogue," he said.
The MDC delegation last week met Malawian
president Bakili Muluzi and South
Africa's ruling African National Congress
secretary-general Kgalema
Motlanthe, who last year was involved in efforts to
broker talks between the
ruling party and the opposition.
Another
MDC team led by deputy-secretary-general Gift Chimanikire was in
Kenya to
meet that country's leadership.
Ncube said the MDC wanted to brief
all Sadc leaders on the situation in
Zimbabwe.
Zim Independent
Chequebooks run out
Eric Chiriga
THE critical
shortage of foreign currency is causing serious problems in the
printing of
chequebooks which are badly needed in the wake of the
cash
crisis.
Sources said two major printing companies, Celsys Print
and Typocrafters
(Pvt) Ltd, are failing to produce enough chequebooks because
there is no
foreign currency to import special paper and magnetic ribbons
which are key
elements in the process.
Celsys Print production
manager Ali Arap said: "We don't have foreign
currency to import the paper
which is used to print chequebooks and we are
now telling the banks to give
us the foreign currency or they can buy the
paper themselves."
Due
to the cash shortage, people had resorted to using bank cheques and the
newly
introduced travellers' cheques as methods of payment.
Before the
problem of chequebooks started, it took only two to three days to
get a
chequebook but now it takes at least a week.
At Metropolitan Bank,
whose chequebooks are printed by Celsys, it used to
take about four days to
get a chequebook but now it takes a week or more.
The situation is the same
with many other banks.
Zim Independent
Agriculture budget unable to meet farmers' needs
Itai
Dzamara
THE supplementary budget allocation to the Ministry of Lands,
Agriculture,
Water and Resettlement for crop inputs is far from what is
necessary to
avert food shortages due to drastically reduced agricultural
productivity.
In his supplementary budget proposal three weeks ago,
Finance minister
Herbert Murerwa allocated an additional $45 billion for crop
inputs as well
as livestock production for the coming farming
season.
That was in addition to the $12,5 billion allocated in the
current budget,
bringing the total to $57,5 billion.
The amount,
analysts say, is insignificant considering the plethora of
constraints facing
the agricultural sector.
Opposition Movement for Democratic Change
(MDC) agriculture spokesman Renson
Gasela told parliament that the $45
billion was too little considering the
task at hand.
"The
additional allocation is far from extricating the country from severe
food
shortages as a result of low productivity," said Gasela.
"The amount
of money required for inputs is a minimum of $432 billion. The
minister (of
Agriculture Joseph Made) says that the additional amount will
include
tillage, fertilisers, chemicals and livestock. So this provision is
too
little."
Gasela said the total budget for farming inputs, if properly
used, would
only yield 150 tonnes of maize. The country requires 2 500 000
tonnes for
consumption. The other option was for farmers to raise their own
funds, and
each would need up to $1 million for seeds and fertilisers
alone.
Murerwa also proposed to make $60 billion available to farmers
through
Agribank, which however is difficult to access due to delays and lack
of
collateral.
In addition, the nation would need to raise enough
foreign currency to
import seeds and fertilisers because of the inability of
local companies to
meet demand.
Fertiliser and seed manufacturers
last week revealed that they would only
manage to produce low quantities this
season due to the shortage of raw
materials, which require foreign
currency.
It also emerged that efforts by government to secure
fertilisers from
Malaysia were hitting a snag due to the shortage of foreign
currency.
The destruction of the agricultural sector caused by
President Robert
Mugabe's chaotic land reform programme which started in 2000
has led to
acute food shortages. Coupled with damaging economic policies, the
effects
have crippled all sectors of society, thereby plunging the country
into the
current crisis.
Zim Independent
German NGOsevers ties with government
Blessing
Zulu
ZIMBABWE-Network, a German-based non-governmental organisation
which
supported the country's liberation movements during the struggle
for
Independence, has cut ties with government to protest human rights
abuses.
A spokesman for the NGO, Rosini Fiedler Conradi, told the
Zimbabwe
Independent that his organisation was appalled by political and
economic
developments in country.
"We were in a crisis at first as
we did not know how to react to the
developments in Zimbabwe following
reports of gross human rights abuses,"
Conradi said.
"Our members
went to Zimbabwe at the height of the political crisis in 2000
and 2001 and
this made the picture clearer. The government, it emerged, did
not adhere to
the principles of democracy and human rights."
Zimbabwe-Network
assisted both Zanu PF and PF-Zapu during the liberation war
against colonial
rule. The network raised money and acquired ammunition for
freedom fighters,
trained teachers at refugee camps outside the country and
provided logistical
support.
The group also assisted in reconstruction and economic
recovery after
Independence. It helped ex-combatants set up self-help
projects.
Conradi said the group had since stopped supporting
Zimbabwe with any form
of aid due to the prevailing repression and human
rights abuses.
Meanwhile, former Zimbabwe-German Trade Association
president Werner Seidel
has blamed the chaotic land reform programme for the
country's economic
decline.
"The grabbing of land, even the land
that had been purchased after
Independence, will scare away potential
voters," Seidel said.
"The message that the government is sending to
potential investors is that
their property rights are not guaranteed. It will
be very difficult to
convince anyone to invest in such an insecure
environment."
Seidel said German investors and local farmers had
engaged him to reason
with President Robert Mugabe when he was in Berlin a
few years ago on the
need to resolve the land imbalances
peacefully.
"I told the president that land reform was necessary but
it had to be
resolved amicably," he said.
"There were many farmers
who were willing to surrender their farms but the
president did not want to
commit himself."
Zimbabwe is in its fourth year of economic
recession. Social instability as
a result of unemployment of around 70%, and
inflation of nearly 400% are
playing havoc in the country. Nearly six million
Zimbabweans will need food
assistance before the next harvest season because
of a marked decline in
agricultural productivity blamed chiefly on the
government's arbitrary
seizure of white commercial
farms.
Government blames the country's enemies led by the UK and the
US, the
opposition MDC and drought.
Zim Independent
MDC pushes for action on talks
Itai Dzamara
THE
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) this week resolved to intensify
pressure
on the ruling Zanu PF party for the resumption of formal dialogue
on the
country's crisis.
This emerged from MDC meetings held to discuss the way
forward following the
party's convincing victory in recent council
elections.
During the meetings, the MDC leadership agreed there was
need to give
priority to arresting the country's economic
decline.
Sources said the meetings dwelt on the need to guard against
Zanu PF's
delaying tactics on the talks while at the same time the ruling
party was
telling regional leaders it was interested in
dialogue.
"Leaders of the party made it clear to the president
(Morgan Tsvangirai)
that action was needed to force Zanu PF to the
negotiating table," said a
source said.
"If nothing happens, it
might call for mass action because the longer things
stay like this the more
people suffer."
The MDC held a widely-observed stayaway in June.
Tsvangirai has given Zanu
PF an October 1 deadline to resume formal dialogue
or face further mass
action.
Zim Independent
Zim's new farmers face starvation
Staff
Writer/Irin
ZIMBABWE'S chaotic land reform programme has spawned hunger and a
major
humanitarian crisis, a recent survey has confirmed.
The survey
by the Consortium for Southern Africa's Food Emergency (C-Safe)
found that
less than one in every 10 families living in newly-resettled
areas in
Zimbabwe has received food aid.
C-Safe said in areas where the
consortium operated, vulnerability was "very
high" and over 60% of the 1 625
households surveyed since March were in "at
least one vulnerability
category".
The government has been telling the international
community that the reform
exercise has empowered the ordinary people. The
claims though do not match
the evidence on the ground.
The survey,
conducted in Zambia, Malawi and Zimbabwe, found that rural
households had
suffered the brunt of the ongoing food crisis, with 80% of
households
classified as "asset poor" or "very poor".
C-Safe noted that while
poverty was a significant contributory factor in
exacerbating the impact
current food shortages were having on rural
families, many households were
without items which could be sold in exchange
for food or to deal with
emergencies.
It is estimated that in Zimbabwe the standard value of
assets owned per
household averages $194 000 (US$139). "Asset values are
significantly lower
in newly resettled areas, as opposed to communal and old
resettled areas,"
the survey said.
In some areas parents had been
forced to remove their children from school,
most of them citing "the high
cost of education" as the main reason.
School-aged children living in
households with a chronically ill family
member dropped out of school at a
significantly higher rate.
"Ongoing drought conditions meant that
almost 40% of all households had
cultivated less land than in the previous
season. C-Safe noted that access
to agricultural inputs varied from district
to district, with over 90% of
households in Gutu, in the south, reporting
insufficient access," the survey
said.
The educational crisis in
the country has been exacerbated by government's
failure to build schools in
the newly resettled areas. This is despite
earlier promises that schools and
clinics would be a top priority.
Zim Independent
Low-income earners bear brunt of cash crunch
Shakeman
Mugari
MARY Majuru, a smallholder farmer from Goromonzi, has been
sleeping on the
streets of Harare for the past three days. Unlike beggars who
have thronged
the streets in search of food, Majuru has been forced to sleep
on the dusty
pavements of Harare because she cannot withdraw her money from
the bank.
With the planting season fast approaching, Majuru’s efforts to
secure inputs
are in limbo.
“I have managed to get only $20 000 in the
last three days. My only hope is
to get enough to buy at least a bag of
fertiliser,” says a dejected Majuru.
Her plight mirrors the debilitating
impact of the cash shortage that has hit
Zimbabwe.
Government’s insistence
that the cash crisis can be solved through stop-gap
measures such as the
introduction of travellers’ cheques has dismally
failed.
The shortage
of bank notes has impacted on everyone across the social
strata. In the last
month President Mugabe has used his executive powers to
ban individuals from
carrying cash in excess of one million. Under the
hurriedly promulgated
regulations, companies are not allowed to keep more
than $5 million. Also in
a kneejerk reaction, the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
last month introduced
travellers’ cheques to ease the cash crisis. The
cheques have however been
rejected by retailers and the public who are
sceptical of their worth.
Travellers’ cheques are problematic in dealings
between individuals who do
not have bank accounts. Commuters also cannot use
them to pay fares or to buy
small items such as newspapers.
The RBZ this week made a U-turn on its
earlier directive to ban banks from
cashing corporate cheques, a move which
analysts say is a clear reflection
of government’s confusion in dealing with
the crisis. They say the cash
crisis could be a death knell for the
productive sector that is already
battling with the fuel crisis, foreign
currency shortages and price
controls. Banks, for their part, have been
giving individuals as little as
$5 000 a day. The amount can only buy five
loaves of bread. This has
resulted in disturbances in banking halls. In some
cases anti-riot police
have had to be summoned to quell angry
mobs.
The hardest hit is the informal sector, which has sustained the
lives of
most Zimbabweans who are out of formal employment courtesy of
President
Mugabe’s economic mismanagement. Unemployment is hovering at 70%
while
inflation is estimated at over 400%, putting a huge strain on the
RBZ’s
capacity to supply adequate bank notes for daily
transactions.
“We are looking at a vendor whose business depends entirely
on the
availability of cash. There is virtually no business in the informal
sector
at the moment,” said Tapiwa Mudhara, a flea market operator in Harare.
“If
the cash crisis persists the informal sector will crumble. From vendors,
the
flea market and even those who sell cellphone recharge cards, business
is
down because people are conserving the little cash they get for the
barest
essentials. The bottom line is that we are in a fix,” Mudhara
said.
Analysts say the blame for the cash crisis lies squarely with
the
government. Recent reports in the state media reveal that the
government
last printed money nine months ago. During the period inflation
has risen to
400% and looks set to breach the 1 000% mark by
year-end.
“The state blames the central bank for the cash shortage yet
the directive
to inject cash into the system is the prerogative of the
government and the
Minister of Finance,” said an economic commentator with
the Zimbabwe
Economic Society. “Unlike in South Africa where the Reserve Bank
operates
with minimum interference from the government, Mugabe thinks he
can
arm-twist the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe. It is this unwarranted
political
interference that has put the economy on its current disastrous
course,”
said the commentator.
Formal business is also on the brink of
collapse due to the crisis. Eric
Bloch, an economic analyst, says the cash
shortage has hit the productive
and services sector and government has no
immediate solution to the problem.
“The catastrophe is that businesses
that have managed to withstand fuel
shortages and price controls might not be
able to deal with the cash
shortage,” said Bloch. “The government shows that
it lacks the vision to
manage the economy effectively. The rising inflation
should have been
matched by printing of more notes. It is a classic example
of how not to run
an economy.”
A rough survey shows that Zimbabweans
now spend half their productive time
in queues of one form or
another.
Armitage Chikwavira, chairman of the Bakers’ Association of
Zimbabwe, says
the impact of the cash shortage has been
devastating.
“Our bread sales have been affected. We have reduced volumes
since the
crisis shortages started,” said Chikwavira.
“At times we
accept cheques but we have serious problems when they are
dishonoured. The
denominations of TCs also make our operations difficult. We
get people with a
$10 000 TC and they want to buy a loaf of bread and we don
’t have the
change.” Efficiency in companies has also been affected by the
shortage.
“Workers either come late or they fail to come at all. Businesses
have to
send many people to get cash for wages.When efficiency goes down the
cost of
doing business goes up, leading to additional inflation. In short,
it is
interfering with volume of trade, which spells disaster for the GDP,”
said
Chikwavira.
Production targets for most companies are lagging behind as
workers pass
their working days in cash queues. Apart from obvious productive
issues, the
cash shortage means that Zimbabwe is no longer a viable option
for potential
investors. International investors have shunned Zimbabwe
because of
political violence, lack of rule of law and government’s crackdown
on
businesses seen as consorting with the opposition.
The government
will introduce a $1000 bill and the rebranded $500 notes late
this month.
However, the RBZ admits that there is no guarantee that the
cross-border
traders would not expatriate the new bills to neighbouring
countries.
Speaking in a ZTV interview, RBZ director for financial markets,
Stuart
Kufeni, said there was no system to curb the expatriation of local
currency
to other countries. “For as longer there are no proper systems the
new notes
are likely to end up in neighbouring countries,” said Kufeni.
Zim Independent
Minor elections test of democratic well
being
SMALL elections, with little depending on them except for voters
and
candidates directly affected, provide a reliable test of a
country’s
democratic system and commitment to free and fair elections. When
such
elections cannot be obtained with little at stake, what reason is there
for
hope in more critical matters?
Chegutu recently provided an
example. General elections for Zimbabwe’s urban
councils must by law be held
in August every fourth year, 2003 being the
first since the failed
constitutional reform exercise of 1999 and the
formation of the MDC with its
known urban support.
While Chegutu’s MP comes from Zanu PF, its election
of an MDC mayor in 2001
confirmed the MDC also enjoys support there.
A
damning official report on corruption, illegality, mismanagement
by
councillors and a climate of “perpetual fear” there among council
employees
showed why the MDC wanted to contest all 11 council seats; and
other High
Court records show what happened when they tried, with violence
allowing the
“election” of all Zanu PF’s nominees without a vote — including
those
officially considered responsible for the past corruption and
fear.
On July 21 what police described as a “rowdy” crowd obstructed
access to
Chegutu’s nomination court, attacking all 11 MDC candidates and
their agents
with bricks and sticks, as they tried to get in to file their
papers,
injuring 10 of them and destroying their documents and those of at
least one
independent candidate. One other man managed to lodge his papers
but
withdrew later the same day fearing for his life, leaving just 11
nominees
chosen by the ruling party, who had all got in there without
difficulty or
fear, to claim to have been elected “freely and fairly” without
a poll.
The MDC advised from the outset that its attackers were clothed
in MDC
T-shirts, of a kind not used by it since 2000 when many were taken by
the
ruling party. Oddly, no ruling party T-shirts were seen
there.
Police confirmed investigations and arrests (unspecified) had been
made.
There was no police report of anyone else injured. No-one has appeared
yet
in the Chegutu criminal court. The ringleader named was not arrested
—
unusual for someone allegedly an MDC member and implicated in
violence.
After newspaper reports about the application to the court for
its
assistance, further attacks at some homes caused more reports against
the
same man.
The MDC said the unruly crowd did not comprise its
members but that the
court needn’t decide who they were as it shouldn’t
matter: Electoral law has
from earliest times prohibited anyone disturbing
election proceedings or
obstructing people from being able to sign papers or
vote.
The officer in charge said he had been approached earlier and had
assured
the MDC of their safety, and had 14 police on duty; but MDC
members’
admitted injuries included a broken leg, a broken nose, a broken
rib, and a
fractured skull.
Police said after they dispersed everybody
with gunfire, they were asked
just after 3 pm at their main station in the
surrounds of Town House (where
the nomination court was sitting) to provide
the MDC candidates with an
escort there. They took one agent to its door at
about 4pm under police
protection — only to be told he was minutes too
late.
The MDC’s aspiring candidates, a group of bookkeepers, businessmen,
workers
and managers, didn’t give up. After medical treatment, they all
applied
urgently to the High Court for an order to allow them and any other
affected
candidates to lodge their nominations without
interference.
The application was filed a week after nominations and a
month before the
poll dates, with replies by all parties and arguments filed
and heard by
August.
Although characterised by such serious known
violence and no voting,
Zimbabwe’s government described the events in Chegutu
as a model of a lawful
election, and successfully opposed the court applying
the precedents of
earlier cases to throw a “lifeline to democracy” to allow
voters to make a
choice.
The Registrar-General, whose duty is to
ensure “free and fair” elections,
throughout refused to use his powers to
alter the nomination days or
consider the nomination papers of those
violently and unlawfully excluded.
The Electoral Supervisory Commission
said its personnel heard the complaint
from the man stripped of his
documentation, and of police dispersing people
outside the court. It revealed
the court adjourned in the afternoon during
its official hours of opening but
used the nomination of one other man to
support a claim that the proceedings
were “relaxed and peaceful” and
“lawful”.
Its four members, each
chosen by President Mugabe, failed to respond to the
evidence of violence
heard by their personnel that day. Because they saw
nothing, they said
nothing, and did nothing.
The urgent application was dismissed a month
after it was filed, three weeks
after closing arguments, and the ruling
party’s choice then sworn in for the
next four years without a vote. The
mayor was not allowed by the “winners”
to attend.
As an appeal against
Judge Hlatshwayo’s judgment is likely, it would be
inappropriate to comment
on whether we believe the decision was in
accordance with the law. The
reality is, when some people decided to
violently block others from standing,
no remedy was available.
The bottom line is this gave voters in Chegutu
no vote. Authorities let an
election be decided by hooligans outside a
nomination court, and all those
who braved the violence to try to get their
names on the ballot papers and
participate in an election did so in
vain.
Few examples could prove more clearly the flaws still remaining in
our
electoral system.
Zim Independent
Eric Bloch
Zim diplomats ill-informed on
privatisation
IT has become highly fashionable for countries whose
economies are in
disarray to blame the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and
the World Bank
whilst also placing blame at the feet of political opponents
and of those
who have the temerity to castigate those countries for their
economic (and
frequent political) instability.
This trend of
deflecting blame from themselves is especially pronounced in
countries who,
because of their economic mismanagement, cease to be
recipients of largesse
from the IMF and the World Bank and who, in many
instances, have been
suspended from IMF membership.
Zimbabwe is among the bevy of countries
whose governments have abused
economic fundamentals and in so doing have
become debt defaulters,
jeopardising their relationships with the IMF and the
World Bank, and not
receiving desperately needed funding support from those
Bretton Woods
institutions. The latest to climb upon the bandwagon of
negating and
disparaging all that those institutions do and the principles
that they
espouse, is Zimbabwe’s High Commissioner to Zambia, Cain
Mathema.
Whatsoever that diplomat’s attributes may be, they very clearly
do not
include economics, for he last week waxed vociferously about the IMF,
the
World Bank, the treasury of the United States, the ineffectiveness
of
liberalised economies and the need for command economies. In so doing,
he
inadvertently made a few correct statements, albeit in incorrect
context
but, in the main, totally misrepresented the realities.
The
high commissioner was commenting on the declining economies of both
Zambia
and Zimbabwe, and this was his first error. Whilst it is indisputable
that
Zimbabwe’s economy is declining, the same is not true of Zambia.
Admittedly,
for almost 40 years that country’s economy was in decline (due
to the then
government policies being advocated by Cain Mathema). However,
that economy
is now on the ascendancy, albeit very slowly because the depths
to which it
had sunk preclude a fast recovery. Zambia does not have a bank
note crisis,
there are no petrol or ATM queues or shortages of other
essential products.
It is not at risk of an energy crisis.
It is not regarded as anathema and
a leper by the international community.
Zambia’s economic recovery is in its
early stages, but that recovery is
under way, including substantial growth in
the agricultural sector (to no
small extent due to its welcoming the very
farmers that Zimbabwe had
displaced), and tourism, whilst its small
industrial base is also achieving
growth. The key difference between the past
and the present is that Zambia
is increasingly liberating and deregulating
the economy and interacting
constructively with the IMF and the World Bank,
whereas in the past Zambia
pursued economic policies completely in line with
those which the high
commissioner commends.
In his statement the
ill-informed diplomat stated that budget overruns and
high poverty levels
would continue for as long as Zambia and Zimbabwe
liberalised their economies
“willy-nilly”. He said that, “Development is not
just about road
infrastructure but must be seen with our workers’ standards
of living
improving. Their food must show there is development including
having good
income” and that “for that development to come we must own and
control the
economy”.
Whilst he is correct that development must be far more diverse
than only
addressing road infrastructure, it is difficult to understand how
he can
credibly support the contention of a need to own and control the
economy.
That was the political philosophy of Zambia from the 1960s to the
mid-1990s,
and its economy was driven down to its knees.
That too has
been the position in Zimbabwe since independence, save briefly
from 1994–97,
and if Zambia was on its knees, then Zimbabwe is now on its
ankles!
Then
Mathema arrived at a most incongruous conclusion as to the
negative
consequences of privatisation. He alleged that the mere fact that
poverty
has remained high in Zambia despite privatising state-owned
enterprises
proved liberalisation was a bad formula to economic development.
In making
that statement he overlooked the fact that Zambia’s economy had
been driven
to such a disastrous low over such a prolonged period of time
that
instantaneous poverty alleviation was an
impossibility.
Privatisation yields funds for governments to fund
development, redeem debt
and reduce state deficits (thereby containing state
borrowings which are a
trigger to inflation), and privatisation usually
releases governments from
subsidy or guarantee commitments and assures
efficiency, productivity and
customer service. Moreover, privatisation is
only one of many elements of
economic liberalisation.
Mathema not only
alleged that privatisation was a myth, but he said: “It has
never worked,
will never work and cannot bring about development.” How then
does he explain
the successful privatisation, more than a century ago, of
certain railway
systems and telecommunications in the US, and more recently
of Renault in
France, and British Telecom and British Gas, and until other
factors
impacted, of British Airways, to cite a few of hundreds of
successful
privatisations? And what about Zimbabwe’s successful
privatisations of
Cottco, Dairibord, Rainbow Tourism Group, Zimbabwe
Reinsurance Company and
the Jewel Bank?
He extends his diatribe against the IMF and the World
Bank by saying that
unless government does away with World Bank policies and
actively intervenes
in the economy, there would be no development. That is
exactly what Zimbabwe
has done for all too long, and not only does it have
little development to
show for it, but its principal attainment is
intensified poverty and near
total collapse of the infrastructure and the
economy.
However, Mathema continued that: “To follow IMF strategies will
not help us
at all” and that the IMF continues “cheating us”. He argued that
IMF
policies have never worked, are counterproductive to economic growth
and
wellbeing and that IMF development proposals and plans were not for
the
advancement of Zambia and Zimbabwe, but to benefit American
companies.
Pursuing this line of argument, he said: “There is enough
poverty in our
region because the IMF/World Bank development plan for us is
to market
supermarkets for American and British multinational companies.
There is so
much dead capital in our region which we cannot exploit because
we are made
to pursue policies that will never develop our economies beyond
poverty.”
What nonsense!
Of course the IMF and the World Bank don’t
get things right all the time.
Their personnel are human and, therefore,
fallible but have a wealth of
experience and a track record of facilitating
many economic recovery
successes, in contradiction to the high commissioner’s
contentions that the
policies of those institutions have never succeeded and
are only directed to
benefiting American and British corporates.
There
are numerous examples, including the dramatic economic growth and per
capita
income increase in the 1970s and 1980s of the “Asian Tigers”, the
spectacular
turnaround in Mauritius from 1984 onwards, the attainments of
many of the
countries in eastern Europe in the post-1989 era, the
astoundingly rapid
recovery of Mexico’s economy from the depths of
depression, and many others.
Even closer to home there are some pronounced
examples, including Botswana
and, in recent times, the commencement of
economic upturn in Kenya (which has
reduced inflation to 8% as compared with
Zimbabwe’s inflation of more than
400%), and an impressive start to economic
recovery in Mozambique,
notwithstanding disastrous climatic conditions for
several
years.
Mathema appears to be particularly upset that the countries of
Comesa, which
includes Zimbabwe, are merely producers of raw materials for
Western
economies. That factually incorrect, for the economies have been, and
can
again become, providers to the populace of Comesa, value-adders
and
beneficiaries to primary products, economic exploiters of major
tourism
resources, and much else. There is nothing wrong with being providers
to
others of raw materials if, in so doing, employment is created,
investment
be forthcoming, the economy is stimulated, and foreign currency
generated to
service needs satisfactorily.
Zimbabwe must remove “the
chip from its shoulder” against the IMF, the World
Bank, and the precepts of
a deregulated economy. Until that occurs
(concurrently with restoration of
law and order, democracy and political
stability), Zimbabwe’s economy will
continue its appalling deterioration,
shrinking more and more and the
population will become increasingly
impoverished.
Zim Independent
Muckraker
Government its own worst
enemy
THE report by a Church-based NGO on Zimbabwe’s National Youth
Service
training programme seems to have stirred an indignant reaction in
government
circles.
Headed by Archbishop Pius Ncube, Solidarity Peace
Trust documents how the
youth brigades have become killer gangs roaming the
country and inflicting
violence at will. At a press conference in
Johannesburg last Friday, youths
who had sought refuge in South Africa after
regretting their depredations
against innocent people, provided testimony on
the vicious record of Zanu PF
’s political enforcers.
Zimbabwean
officials switched to denial mode, first seeking to discredit the
source and
then demanding to know why the gangsters had not been handed over
to the
police.
The Herald, casually tossing edi-torial opinion into its report of
the
Johannesburg press conference, claimed “Archbishop Ncube has taken
every
opportunity to tarnish the image of the government at international
fora and
during his sermons”.
It didn’t tell us that the government
needed no help from anybody else in
tarnishing its reputation. The Green
Bombers are after all a product of its
political desperation and their record
speaks for itself.
Archbishop Ncube was accused of “harbouring youths who
have confessed to
committing rape, murder and torture in Zimbabwe”.
So
it’s true then! That’s exactly what the report says they were doing.
Some
elements in the state media tried to convince us these atrocities were
the
work of Selous Scouts!
Minister of Youth Development Elliot Manyika
who presides over the travesty
known as National Youth Service queried why
the archbishop was harbouring
criminals. “He should behave like a responsible
citizen,” Manyika stupidly
insisted, as if anybody in his party met that
criteria!
He said his ministry and party were able to account for the
activities of
“their” youths — which is worth recording for the day when they
will be
required to account for their trail of violence, lawlessness and
mayhem. The
report is illustrated by graphic photos of torture
victims.
Only slightly less obtuse than Manyika, we had Wayne Bvudzijena
saying
investigations by the police showed that no such incidents took place
in the
country. They were “fabrications by people with vested interests bent
on
tarnishing the country’s image”, he dutifully claimed in precisely the
same
language as that adopted by other Zanu PF megaphones.
Archbishop
Ncube was “just trying to attract attention by moving around with
the alleged
murderers”, Bvudzijena said. He accused the South African media
of failing to
verify the authenticity of the claims.
Bvudzijena’s statement exposes not
only the unprofessional and partisan
posturing of the ZRP since it became a
tool of the ruling party whose
spokesmen are rewarded with farms, it shows
why no victims of the youth
brigades’ terror should expect justice in
Zimbabwe.
The report itself is a well-researched chronicle of the
shocking record of
murder, abductions, disappearances, torture, rape, arson
and intimidation.
“Accounts of the militia being implicated in theft,
vandalism and usurping
powers of law enforcement agencies are multiple,” the
report says.
“On the whole the youth militia have impunity, often working
under the
direction of war veterans and alongside government agencies in
their illegal
activities.” It gives the example of Green Bombers manning
roadblocks.
Alongside this damning body of evidence Bvudzijena’s shrill
denials sound
spoon-fed and hollow.
“In the event that police prove
that a crime was committed, we will liaise
with our South African
counterparts to have the criminals extradited,”
Bvudzijena claimed.
The
obvious reply to that is to ask what the response of the police has been
to
political killings, abductions and torture since 2000? How many
successful
investigations have there been? How many prosecutions?
What progress has
there been in the case of the abduction and torture of
Mark Chavunduka and
Ray Choto? What is the current status of the killers of
Talent Mabika and
Tichaona Chiminya? What has happened to the killers of
David Stevens and
other farmers such as Gloria and Martin Olds, gunned down
in cold
blood?
Do the public have confidence that where they have been victims of
political
violence, the police will investigate impartially and take
appropriate
action? Has that been the case to date?
Bvudzijena should
ask himself why Solidarity Peace Trust felt it necessary
to hold its press
conference in the relative safety of Johannesburg instead
of in Harare where
victims of violence are more likely to be arrested than
the perpetrators. A
man was prosecuted under Posa this week for simply
faxing a letter to a
friend in the UK saying Zanu PF had unleashed violence
during the
recently-concluded local government polls. His arrest represents
a blatant
violation of his constitutional rights.
Do we really want to wake up on
Saturday morning to see Stan Mudenge doing
mouth-to-mouth resuscitation on
his wife? The picture of the newlyweds
smooching at their wedding reception
in Masvingo was plastered on the paper’
s front page and then enlarged on
Page 3.
While we wish the couple well, the Herald should seriously
reflect on the
sensitivities of its readers who want to enjoy their
breakfasts without
having to experience Stan and Alice munching on each
other.
And are we familiar with the expression that “there was enough
beer to sink
a duck” at the reception? In the end some guzzlers “literally
crawled home”,
we are told. We hope that didn’t include the
reporter.
President Mugabe disclosed in his address to the revellers that
Stan never
rests from his job as Foreign minister. Many times he falls asleep
as soon
as their plane takes off, the president revealed.
“Probably he
does not know that I have heard him snore many times but now he
has a wife to
look to,” Mugabe said, drawing laughter from the assembled
guests.
We are
still trying to work out how marriage is going to solve the problem.
Will
Stan be bringing his wife along to give him a nudge when he starts to
compete
with the roar of the jet engines?
The Sunday Mail’s creepy “Under the
Surface” columnist who sounds identical
to the Herald’s Jonathan Nathaniel
Manheru, has congratulated the Zimbabwe
Independent for not carrying the
inter-party talks story on its front page
last week. This is clearly a matter
of some sensitivity.
“The paper managed to find a lead story that had
nothing to do with the
imaginary talks,” Cde Under declared.
So there
have been no talks at all between Zanu PF and the MDC? Don’t we
recall the
Sunday Mail in one of its news reports recently admitting that
talks were
taking place while this same columnist was insisting they weren’
t?
So
why is Cde Under so adamant that no talks are taking place? Has he
been
dropped from the negotiating team? Why do reports on the inter-party
talks
bug him so much?
Because, like his boss, he sees the talks not only
as a threat to his
political survival but an admission of Zanu PF’s failure
to govern. And it
is extremely galling that Zanu PF needs the MDC to rescue
them from the dire
straits they now find themselves in. Then there is all
that annoying
pressure from Sadc leaders who, while publicly expressing
solidarity, are
privately prodding Mugabe to sit down and negotiate. There is
only one way
to express this frustration and that’s to deny any such talks
are taking
place or are even contemplated.
But when they do get under
way let’s hope this same columnist doesn’t say he
should have seen it coming.
“The writing was on the wall but somehow we didn
’t see it.”
Meanwhile, if
Cde Under is sincere in his objections to the Independent
carrying what he
claims is the same story on its front page every week, why
does he continue
to help Munyaradzi Huni write the same story every week
about the MDC
removing Morgan Tsvangirai? Haven’t we all had enough of that
imaginary story
by now?
Cde Under, by the way, is still insi-sting that “the majority”
of
Commonwealth nations support Zimbabwe’s case for lifting its suspension.
Cle
arly he didn’t read the statement by the South Pacific states which
met
recently. There was no suggestion there that Zimbabwe was about to be
let
off the hook. Admittedly, two of those South Pacific states were
“white”.
But the rest were decidedly not. And when you count all those
little
islands, they all add up to the numbers ranged against Zimbabwe and
its
dwindling band of friends. In any case, the Commonwealth moves by
consensus,
not a simple vote. And the consensus at the moment is that,
whatever the
views of Sadc and Nigeria, there are no grounds for lifting the
suspension.
Get it?
So who needs his head examined? Didymus Mutasa or
the rest of us?
Responding to reports that Zimbabweans in the US had sought
asylum there,
Mutasa said those involved should have their heads
examined.
“They are a crazy gang on a mission to spread falsehoods about
their mother
country,” he said. “Everything is normal in Zimbabwe and anyone
who thinks
otherwise should have his head examined.”
Now, how many
people out there think “everything is normal in Zimbabwe”? Or
can we safely
suppose the Zanu PF leadership has a different definition of
normality from
the rest of us?
Whatever the case, we know who the real Crazy Gang are.
They’re the guys in
charge. Right Didymus?
Those of you who thought
last year’s drought was the product of a regional
dry spell have now been put
straight by deputy Minister of Transport and
Communications Christopher
Mushowe. He told parliament that it was all part
of the conspiracy against
Zimbabwe.
The Department of Meteorological Services was operating without
a legal
framework, Mushowe pointed out. “Hence, enemies of the state are
exploiting
these loopholes as cloud-seeding can be used to disperse clouds,
thereby
contributing to drought weather as what happened last
year.”
Please cut this out and send it to your friends overseas. We want
the world
to know about the Crazy Gang who think last year’s drought was the
product
of cloud-seeding. It takes a special sort of ministerial mind to trot
out
this nonsense. We are only surprised he didn’t attribute it to the
Selous
Scouts.
Perhaps Mushowe could remind us of where he obtained
his university
qualifications — and how. It was all an up-Hill struggle we
gather!
Most Zimbabweans were under the impression that they liberated
themselves in
1980. Not so, according to Libyan leader Moammar Gadaffi. We
were liberated
by Libya.
Gadaffi told a cheering crowd at a ceremony to
mark the 34th anniversary of
the coup that brought him to power that he had
bought his way out of the
Lockerbie imbroglio and paid for the liberation
struggle of Palestinians and
others.
“What is money for?” he was
quoted as saying in the M&G. “With money we
defend our
country.”
“We liberated South Africa, Zimbabwe, Guinea Bissau, Cape
Verde, and Angola.
Now we are reaping the fruits of our struggle. Africa is
with us and
supports us.”
So that explains why President Mugabe feels
obliged to hand over our
national assets.
Finally, our quote of the
week comes from Albert Musarurwa of the Zimbabwe
Human Rights
Forum.
Replying to claims from Zimbabwean diplomats that sanctions were
causing
hardships, he said: “The Zimbabwe economy is not melting down because
Mugabe
cannot go to New York.”
Nicely put Albert.
Zim Independent
Bank sees no change in Zim's deficit
Ngoni
Chanakira
ZIMBABWE'S current account deficit for the year is forecast to
remain at
around US$1 billion with merchandise exports expected to remain
weak, a
leading financial institution has said.
NMB Holdings Ltd
(NMB), which recently had its foreign currency trading
licence withdrawn by
the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe, said merchandise imports
were expected to end
the year at US$2 billion, against a background of
declining Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI) and the absence of much-needed
balance of payments
support.
Zimbabwe had its balance of payments support facility with
the International
Monetary Fund withdrawn after the country failed to make
timely repayments
to the Washington-based institution.
NMB
chairman Paddy Zhanda said a capital account deficit of about US$300
million
was forecast for this year, up from about US$200 million in 2002.
"As
a result of the weak balance of payments position, gross foreign
exchange
reserves are expected to average about one month of imports while
usable
reserves are expected to cover only a few days of imports," he said
in an
analysis of the economy.
Zhanda said Zimbabwe's total external
payment arrears were estimated at
US$1,6 billion as at June 30 this year from
a position of US$1,3 billion at
December 31 2002.
Government
arrears account for 67% (US$1,07 billion), while parastatals and
private
sector arrears represent 31% (US$0,5 billion) and 2% (US$0,03
billion)
respectively.
The chairman said given Zimbabwe's weakening export
performance, donor
support would be required for grain
imports.
The first half of the year saw continued designation of
farms and the
establishment of a land audit committee to review the
allocation of land
distribution under the controversial fast-track
phase.
Zhanda said agrarian reforms were unlikely to succeed without
a "clearly
defined tenure system, adequate technical and financial support to
the new
farmers and systematic development of support
infrastructures".
"External financiers and partners will be needed to
alleviate the external
debt crisis and provide support for the country's
balance of payments
deficit," Zhanda said.
Zim Independent
Nerp in tatters, says EIU
Staff Writer
THE
Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) says the government-driven
National
Economic Revival Programme (Nerp) will not solve the current
economic crisis
because it is already in tatters owing to
bureaucracy.
In a report for 2003-2004 the EIU said there was no hope the
programme would
solve the current crisis. It says government had undermined
the revival plan
and reneged on its earlier promises to the stakeholders of
Nerp.
"If there was any belief that Nerp would be a solution to
Zimbabwe's
economic crisis, the government itself undermined it by
unilaterally
announcing increases in wages and prices and then extending
price controls
over a comprehensive list of basic items," the report
said.
The EIU expressed concern over government's commitment to
implement the
policies envisaged under Nerp. "It is clear that the programmes
outlined in
Nerp to boost various sectors of the economy, in particular the
gold and
tobacco sectors to improve foreign-exchange earnings, will not
be
implemented," it said.
"The shortage of bank notes and foreign
currency experienced in July and
August, and the government's odd and
ineffective methods of addressing these
problems, illustrate that there is
now little constructive policy planning,
merely ad hoc crisis management
coupled with a hefty dose of wishful
thinking."
Under the Nerp
agreement the decision to hike wages and prices of basic
commodities was
supposed to be reached with the tripartite negotiating forum
(consisting of
the government, organised labour and the business community).
Under
the tripartite negotiating forum businesses and the unions had also
agreed to
police wage and price increases to help meet the inflation target
of 96% by
the end of the year.
Zim Independent
Prospects of beef industry revival dim
Ngoni
Chanakira
ZIMBABWE's cattle herd continues to decline and prospects that the
beef
industry is likely to recover are dim, says a senior official from
the
Cattle Producers Association (CPA).
The official yesterday said
the foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks further
worsened prospects for
much-needed foreign currency earnings.
"The foot-and-mouth disease
outbreaks continue to dog the industry," he
said. "Our cattle industry like
all other sectors in this economy is on the
verge of collapse despite the
willingness by some farmers to bring the
industry back on its
feet."
He said several trips had been made to Malaysia in a bid to
try and win that
market after Zimbabwe had lost out on the lucrative European
Union (EU)
export deal.
The official said beef exports to South
Africa and Libya had also been
halted because of the foot-and-mouth outbreaks
in Mashonaland.
The EU has said the ban on Zimbabwean beef to the
region would not be lifted
until the foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks were
brought under control.
This put paid to reports that "millions in
foreign currency" would be
chalked up soon by the cash-strapped
government.
In an interview the Head of the European Commission to
Zimbabwe Francesca
Mosca said: "Zimbabwe imposed a self ban on beef exports
to the European
Union since 2001 and this has not been lifted. The ban was
related to the
outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. Before the ban was
imposed, Zimbabwe had
a beef export quota to the EU of 9 100 tonnes per year
under the 'Beef and
Veal Protocol' under the Lome IV
Convention."
Mosca said this quota was worth more than $2
billion.
"In 2001, before the ban, Zimbabwe had exported around 4 500
tonnes worth
about $1,5 billion," Mosca said. "In 2002 the European
Commission spent 17,2
million euro on projects in Zimbabwe and 28,6 million
euro have so far been
approved for projects in 2003. Apart from this, the
amount spent on/approved
for food aid during 2002 and 2003 is 79,5 million
euro."
An export deal with the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)
hangs in the
balance because the Congolese are allegedly not paying
government the agreed
United States dollars, preferring "barter deals"
instead.
In a major U-turn about two years ago, seen by business
executives as a
political "appeasement arrangement for disgruntled indigenous
businessmen",
government gave Farirayi Quality Foods (Pvt) Ltd the go-ahead
to also export
beef.
The company, whose boss is John Mapondera,
was allowed to export beef to
Libya, following President Robert Mugabe's
visit to that country in search
of fuel and "alternative markets other than
the EU".
Zim Independent
Where are chefs' children?
WE Zimbabweans are
without souls. Whatever our excuses, why are we so
docile? We are asked to
fight each other, rape our own daughters and
children, dehumanise everyone,
etc.
For a country so full of educated people, it appears education has
done
nothing for us. Next time you are at a Border Gezi Training camp ask
where
the chefs' sons and daughters are while you get
abused.
Those who blame the MDC for a low turnout at elections have
been so
comfortable in their low-density suburbs and turned a blind eye to
the
torture, intimidation and fear surrounding them.
Those who
blame the MDC should be supporting it for keeping the lights
burning before
we retrace our steps to the Dark Continent.
For those in South Africa
who still support the status quo, it's coming to
you too sooner rather than
later - racism, intimidation, the killing of
white farmers, etc.
I
would also like to ask the foot soldiers of farm invasions what is
happening
to them now that the chefs are allocating themselves prime land?
The
MDC should clearly state that the land will be taken back before a
properly
commissioned, apolitical land commission is convened to fairly
redistribute
the land. Zimbabwe is for Zimbabweans of all colours and not
for Zanu PF.
Pasi nekukara.
Hakuna Usingafi,
UK.
Zim Independent
Travellers' cheques not recognised as
cash
ALTHOUGH the Reserve Bank says that Zimbabwe travellers' cheques are
as good
as cash, they are not recognised as such by commercial banks and
building
societies.
For example, I want to move a sum of money from my
current account at
Barclays to a savings account at Cabs so that I can
immediately use the Cabs
purchase-point machines in supermarkets to buy my
groceries, having neither
cash nor sufficient cheques to do
this.
I thought that the simplest and quickest way to move "cash"
into the Cabs
account would be to draw travellers' cheques from my current
account and pay
them straight into the Cabs account. That way, since they are
"as good as
cash", I would have immediate access to that
money.
Not so. Cabs regard travellers' cheques as cheques, not as
cash, and want
three weeks to clear them. And Barclays also tell me that if I
were to pay a
travellers' cheque into my current account, they too require
a
cheque-clearance period. What are they clearing?
I cannot buy a
travellers' cheque from my commercial bank unless I have
cleared funds
available. Payment against a travellers' cheque is not subject
to there being
funds in my account at the time that it is "cleared". The
travellers' cheque
has already been paid for.
All that is necessary for a travellers'
cheque to be cleared is for it to be
verified that the two signatures on it
are from the same (any) person (not
that it is the signature of an
account-holder whose sample signature is kept
on file at the bank) and that
the cheque itself is not forged.
These should be able to be done by
the teller in the same way that tellers
are able to verify the legitimacy of
any bank notes that they accept for
deposit.
By wishing to "clear"
the travellers' cheques, Cabs and other commercial
banks are implying that
they could subsequently choose to decline them.
So what could happen is
that, after a couple of weeks, Cabs could return my
travellers' cheques to me
having declined them.
I would then presumably have to pay them back
into my account at Barclays,
who would again require their clearance period,
and who could, presumably,
also decline them. Where would that leave me and
my "cash"? And if Cabs and
Barclays think that this scenario is impossible,
why do they need the
clearance period?
So what is happening to the
money paid for travellers' cheques while they
are waiting for "clearance"?
Cabs and commercial banks are evidently able to
use my cash for their own
purposes for several weeks while they do not allow
me to use
it.
They are the only ones benefiting from the use of Zimbabwe
travellers'
cheques. It certainly isn't their customers.
And where is
the Reserve Bank while this farce is being enacted?
Roger
Stringer,
Mount Pleasant.
Zim Independent
Not even apartheid was this bad
SO often we take
our freedom and democracy in South Africa for granted that
we forget the
plight of those, such as yourselves, in Zimbabwe.
I had the misfortune of
visiting Zimbabwe on a mining exploration exercise
on August 13-21. We (my
family and I) were scheduled to visit the Victoria
Falls and surrounding
areas in the Mlibizi/Zambezi basin for a river
boat
experience.
Whilst we enjoyed the Victoria Falls and an
excursion into Zambia, our
experience in the small mining town of Kamativi
(about 200 km from Hwange)
left much to be desired.
From the
information my family and I had, this tin mining town used to be a
bustling
metropolis for rural folk coming from Binga, Tinde and
surrounding
areas.
As the mine has since closed down, a number of
small "co-operatives" still
live off open-cast subsistence mining including
tin and Tantalite (the
latter being one of the minerals I have been
contemplating harvesting).
As we approached Kamativi mine, we found
the entrance to the mine (near a
local police presence) barricaded with boom
gates operated by what we later
understood to be the notorious "Green
Bombers".
These Green Bombers in Kamativi not only manhandled myself
and my wife, they
even went through our food (helping themselves in the
process), luggage and
car. Had my wife not been there with me, I would have
gladly fought for my
rights (But then again, what rights did I have in
Zimbabwe?).
To add insult to injury, the police presence there, about
a couple of
hundred metres away, did nothing to assist. If anything, they
acted as if
nothing was taking place.
Further to the above, I was
searched and interrogated as if I was a spy, as
if I had contraband that I
was trying to smuggle into the mine.
Needless to say that we were not
allowed access into the mine and, from folk
we managed to talk to on our way
back, the former tin mine is now being used
as a training camp or base for
these senseless monsters of a defunct regime.
Surely there has to be
a way to get rid of your present dispensation with
dignity?
The
worst humiliation I was ever subjected to in South Africa during
the
apartheid days pales compared to what my family and I went through
at
Kamativi that day.
As I understand that the mine still has some
local habitants there, I
shudder to think of what these poor souls go through
on a daily basis.
Does anyone know that this mine (judging by its
remoteness and
inaccessibility) is being used for such nefarious activities?
That a
population is being subjected to human rights abuses on a daily basis?
That
local women are probably (God forbid) being raped every
day?
I realise a lot of issues still have to be resolved in your
country and my
heart goes out to you the people of Zimbabwe. But unless the
local
population does something rather than wait for a saviour, everyone is
going
to die of hunger sooner rather than later.
Aluta continua.
Adam Malindi.
KwaZulu/Natal,
South
Africa.
Zim Independent
Editor's Memo
How healthy?
Iden Wetherell
I
HAVE been inundated with calls this week and last from radio stations
in
South Africa and Europe enquiring about President Mugabe's
health.
There have been reports of serious illness and even of his demise
- in Libya
this week. He travels with a urologist in attendance at all times,
the
reports suggest, and has been receiving treatment in Iran, among
other
places.
Although we reported in the Zimbabwe Independent
last week what the South
African press was saying, I have had to pour cold
water on most of these
speculative stories. There is very simply no evidence
of Mugabe ailing. He
is to all intents and purposes remarkably fit for a man
of 79, alert, agile,
and although profoundly delusional about the country's
problems, otherwise
fully compos mentis.
In fact, the only
evidence we have of any ailment was when he collapsed in
his hotel room in
Malaysia a couple of years ago. That accident was
difficult to conceal
because of bandaging. But it is the solitary indicator
that anything might be
amiss.
Harare has been awash with rumours. The most persistent one
concerns not a
urologist but a prominent neuro-surgeon. He clears his surgery
of all
waiting patients, we have been told, so as to afford the president
some
privacy during his regular visits.
It's all "absolute
rubbish", the specialist has told anybody who bothers to
enquire. He is not
treating Mugabe. But you will find people who insist they
know somebody who
was asked to clear the neurologist's waiting room ahead of
a presidential
visit.
It is never of course the actual person who provides the story
who was asked
to leave, always somebody they know.
One reason why
Harare is such a rumour mill is the unwarranted secrecy
surrounding the
president's health. His staff very simply will not tell us
about any
treatment he might be receiving, even where it is minor, instead
creating a
smokescreen such as last Friday's upbeat statement about Mugabe
and
Vice-President Simon Muzenda.
While there may not be any truth to the
rumours currently circulating about
Mugabe, Muzenda's health does give cause
for concern. If he is on the road
to recovery as the President's Office
suggests, why not publish a photograph
of him sitting up in bed and receiving
visitors?
Like Joshua Nkomo, Muzenda has not been allowed to retire
for fear of
upsetting the balance of power at the top. Officials will argue
that the
health of the president and his deputies is a private matter. I
disagree.
They hold public office and are paid from public funds. Their
health is of
legitimate concern as it relates to the nation's health. Can
individuals
with life-threatening illnesses be expected to manage the
day-to-day
business of government?
There have been shocking cases
elsewhere of unelected officials and spouses
usurping executive power during
the illness of their employers or husbands.
US President Woodrow
Wilson's wife Edith made key decisions for 17 months in
1919/20 after her
husband suffered a stroke while campaigning hard for
ratification of the
Treaty of Versailles.
His exertions left him half-blind and
semi-coherent. Edith communicated his
"instructions" to the outside world
with the help of his doctor and private
secretary. Vice-President Thomas
Marshall felt unable to take over so long
as orders continued to flow from
Wilson's bedside.
In the event, Wilson lost the battle for
ratification of the treaty in the
Senate and thereby doomed the League of
Nations to impotence.
In 1953 Sir Winston Churchill's stroke was kept
secret from the British
public. Even the cabinet was not informed. His
parliamentary private
secretary Christopher Soames (26 years later, the last
Governor of Rhodesia)
managed the Prime Minister's office while RA Butler
presided in Whitehall
and Lord Salisbury ran the Foreign Office. The system
continued to function
despite the absence of the PM.
Then, closer
to home, there was Kamuzu Banda, John Tembo and Mama Cecilia
Kadzamira. Who
really ran Malawi during Banda's twilight years?
In all such cases
officials argue the need for continuity and stability. I
shudder to think who
might really be running the country from Munhumutapa
Building or Borrowdale
Brooke in the event of presidential infirmity!
The current succession
race will have fuelled, and in turn been fuelled by,
the rumours of
ill-health at the top. It will add to the pressure on Zanu PF
to allow new
leaders to emerge from the party's annual conference
in
December.
These could be two new vice-presidents - the most
likely scenario that would
see Emmerson Mnangagwa and John Nkomo filling the
shoes of Muzenda and
Joseph Msika respectively - or a new party boss taking
over from Mugabe who
would remain as long as he could as president, be it in
a more ceremonial
role.
Whatever the case, it is inevitable that
the public should want to know the
health status of their leaders. Nearly 50%
of men over 60 have a urological
complaint of some sort or prostate
problems.
Instead of dissembling, Mugabe's officials should try
telling us the truth.
It is usually the most effective antidote to rumour and
speculation. And it
generates confidence in the system of government,
something desperately
needed right now.
Zim Independent
Countrymen, I come to praise Gushungo
By Paul
Taylor
THE late great Professor Masipula Sithole once described Zimbabwe as
a
nation in waiting.
Waiting is in our nature.
Sometimes,
as I stand on a London Underground platform, fuming because a
train has been
delayed by a few minutes, I remember the queues at home. I
remember seeing a
bus which had crashed on the Old Gwanda Road. The
passengers had decamped,
made fires and set pots of food to cook, knowing
that it would take a long
time for a replacement bus to reach them.
They knew how to
wait.
It is a sad fact of Zimbabwean politics that a number of people
are
currently waiting, with barely concealed impatience, for the day that
the
life of Gushungo reaches its allotted span. In fairness, it must
be
emphasised that not all of these malicious people are members of the Zanu
PF
politburo.
We are indeed a nation in waiting. Locked as we are
in a grim and dreary
present, we all understand that a brighter tomorrow is
but a heartbeat away.
Unsurprisingly, rumours about Gushungo's health
abound. Last week a story
mischievously reported that Gushungo and his
urologist were en route to Iran
for specialist surgery.
The
interesting thing about this story is that it is rumoured to have
emanated
from official South African sources. If the story did not emanate
in South
Africa's corridors of power, it is certainly being told and retold
there,
with great glee.
Why anyone should want to play up worries about
Gushungo's health just as
his politburo is about to discuss the vexed
succession issue is anyone's
guess. It is as if people in high places want to
weaken further the already
weakening Old Man and accelerate his departure
from power.
If the Mbeki government is Gushungo's friend I would not
like to imagine the
stories that Gushungo's enemies are telling about him. As
it turns out,
Gushungo did not go to Iran. Instead, having turned Zimbabwe
into a desert,
he went to Cuba to attend a conference about
desertification.
I count myself as another one of Gushungo's friends.
As I am blessedly not
in a position to write his obituary, I would like to
offer instead an
appreciation of his life's work. It may be said that I come
to praise
Gushungo, not to bury him.
The Ancient Greeks believed
that it was only possible to judge a man's life
when he was dead. "Call no
man happy until he is dead," they said.
But Gushungo is now very old
and surely we can see at last the true nature
of the man which has taken
years to emerge. Surely he is now the figure he
himself has secretly aspired
to becoming through the years.
The little boy thirstily absorbing his
lessons at Kutama Mission; the
serious school master who sojourned at
Empandeni Mission; the zealous
freedom fighter who sat down beside Alexander
Kanengoni by the rivers of
Mozambique and wept, while drinking rotgut liquor
in the cause of the
liberation of Zimbabwe; all these figures belong to the
past.
The Gushungo who has metamorphosed through all these stages is
as
unrecognisable as the mopane moth is from the worm that prefigures
it.
Today he can be vividly described in just a few
images.
The first image is taken from the opening of parliament. The
ceremony has
always been ridiculously ornate, even by pompous colonial
standards.
Self-importance was always so immense in Establishment circles
that it
tended towards the constipative. But when Gushungo's portrait
suddenly
materialised and he appeared to bow to his own image, a new standard
of
absurd self-importance was established. Gushungo caricatured himself so
well
that at a stroke every satirical writer in Zimbabwe was put permanently
out
of business.
I suppose we should just be grateful that he did
not genuflect.
The second image, though not of Gushungo himself, is just
as revealing as a
portrait. It is a picture taken from the air of Gushungo's
new palace. Just
as if he feels the need to fill Mobutu Sese Seko's shoes
before he follows
Mobutu's fate, he has built his very own
Gbadolite.
The vulgar opulence, the luxurious ugliness, the massive
scale of the place
is stunning. The self-obsession, callousness and
complacency it represents
in a country where the mass of people survive only
on the kindness of
strangers is nauseating.
I am still surprised
at my surprise at the picture of the palace because,
like others, I have long
been following stories about Gushungo's wealth and
its sources and its hiding
places. But this tacky palace told me in hard
materials, kitsch concrete and
insipid ceramics, that the ascetic Gushungo
who tells the world that Africans
are prepared to eat cold food and sleep on
hard floors in the struggle
against neo-colonialism does not exist: and that
it is true to say he never
existed.
Instead, we have to face up to the fact that we are ruled,
not by a great
revolutionary, or a principled nationalist, or a true son of
the soil, but
by a callous, vulgar little hypocrite.
My late
father had a certain respect for Gushungo. When he came to power and
preached
reconciliation my father believed that this fellow school master,
this
supposed Christian, might yet break the mould of flawed
post-colonial
leadership.
Before he died however my father would
be cruelly disillusioned by the
appearance of the Fifth Brigade in the rural
Matabeleland in which he had
spent his adult life. I am glad my father is not
alive today to witness the
final flowering of Gushungo's cruelty and
vanity.
Gushungo, you have become the mocking symbol of our nation's
mad decline. As
Brutus was Caesar's friend, so as your friend I say, I wish
for the sake of
your place in history that you had gone long before this day
dawned.
Paul Taylor writes on civic issues.
Zim Independent
A triumph of courage over fear
By David
Coltart
WHEN I woke up and thought of the thousands of Zimbabweans who
confronted
tyranny with their votes on the weekend of August 30/31, I was
reminded of
Robert Browning's words: "One who never turned his back but
marched breast
forward; Never doubted clouds would break; Never dreamed
though right were
worsted wrong would triumph; Held we fall to rise, are
baffled to fight
better; Sleep to wake."
These words epitomise the
spirit the MDC and its supporters countrywide
demonstrated in the stunning
urban council results.
"Stunning?" some may ask. After all the MDC
lost Kwekwe and Kadoma and lost
a few small towns in Mashonaland. Kwekwe and
Kadoma were both parliamentary
seats we won in 2000 and were of course seats
we should have won. That, some
may argue, is hardly stunning.
But
I am elated and the events of the past few weeks are highly significant.
If
one needed any confirmation of the significance of the results one only
had
to watch ZTV, as I did, to appreciate how crushing these results were to
Zanu
PF. The results, were only announced almost in passing, 20 minutes into
the
news bulletin. Had Zanu PF been happy with the results they would have
been
first up.
Why then is Zanu PF devastated and why are these results
stunning? It is
because:
The MDC has finally gained effective
control of the urban areas.
Before the poll Zanu PF controlled every
single municipality in the country
save for Harare. Now they have woken up to
the reality that the MDC controls
the municipalities of Harare, Bulawayo,
Gweru, Mutare, Masvingo, Victoria
Falls, Kariba, Gwanda, Ruwa and Hwange and
shares power in Chegutu (where we
still have an MDC mayor even if all our
candidates were prevented from
filing their nomination papers) and
Zvishavane.
In other words the MDC now controls the budgets and
general operations of
Zimbabwe's five largest cities, its two premier tourist
resorts and several
strategically important towns.
Some 40% of
Zimbabwe's urban population live in these centres which are now
liberated
from Zanu PF's power and corruption. These same centres generate
over 50% of
our GDP. Whilst the MDC won parliamentary seats in all these
cities and towns
in 2000, that never translated into control because MDC MPs
have always been
in a minority in parliament and were powerless to prevent
Zanu PF from
passing laws and budgets to their liking.
For the first time the MDC has
gained almost total control over the areas it
first won largely symbolically
in 2000.
The MDC has in reality gained ground. For all the focus in
the regime's
media on the MDC losing ground in Kwekwe and Kadoma the reality
is far
different. It is in fact Zanu PF that has lost ground. Kwekwe and
Kadoma
were only lost because of massive doses of violence and
intimidation
perpetrated by the regime.
Let us not forget that the
MDC MP for Kadoma, Austin Mupandawana, died only
a few weeks ago, his death a
direct result of his unlawful detention and
torture by the regime in March,
which severely undermined our capacity in
that town.
Our Kwekwe
MP, Blessing Chebundo, had his car smashed by Zanu PF hooligans
on the first
day of the election, the voter turnout was way over the
national average
(suggesting that Zanu PF went to extra lengths to truck
people in) and
suspected MDC supporters were dragged out of voter queues by
Zanu PF
thugs.
Zanu PF was only able to win in Chegutu and Bindura by
violently preventing
our candidates from even filing their nomination papers.
In towns like
Marondera and Norton they only won through pervasive
intimidation. In areas
where Zanu PF leaders were complacent and took their
eyes off the ball they
lost ground.
It is pertinent to remember
that both Kariba and Zvishavane were won by Zanu
PF MPs in the 2000
parliamentary election. Kariba is now controlled outright
by the MDC and has
a white MDC mayor! Zvishavane is now jointly controlled
by the MDC and Zanu
PF who won five seats each.
The result in Kariba is particularly
remarkable because it is in Mashonaland
West province which has been a no go
area for the MDC since the 2002
presidential election.
The MDC won
despite apathy.
Low voter turnout created by apathy traditionally favours
Zanu PF because it
is guaranteed of being able to get a hardcore out to vote
come what may.
In this election Zanu PF used war veterans and youth
militia to do its
campaigning in Bulawayo and I suspect that the same was the
case
countrywide. These people who are paid all voted and guaranteed that
Zanu PF
would get a basic minimum percentage of the vote. The regime
encouraged
apathy, for example the location of polling stations was not
advertised and
very little effort was made to get out the vote. In Bulawayo
Zanu PF
candidates did not hold campaign rallies.
All of this was
premised on the hope that only a few people would turn out
to vote and that
they would be able to win by default. This strategy was
supplemented by two
diametrically opposed attitudes I discerned in the
voting public in Bulawayo
which I suspect prevailed countrywide.
The (negative) one was that
there was simply no point in voting. People had
voted for change in 2002 but
Zanu PF had rigged and stolen the result and
would just do the same again.
The other (positive) one was that the MDC had
won by such overwhelming
margins in urban areas in the 2000 and 2002
elections that there was no need
to vote, especially when one had such
difficulty in securing basic
necessities such as cash, food and fuel.
Added to that of course were
the threats to withhold food which created a
huge moral dilemma in the minds
of most voters who were torn between voting
in large numbers for the party of
their choice and as a result possibly
denying their children
food.
Given these obstacles it is astonishing that the MDC did as
well as it did
and whilst we clearly have work to do in getting people to
turn out in
greater numbers, it is Zanu PF that has to confront the harsh
reality that
in a city the size of Bulawayo with over 800 000 inhabitants,
they can only
rely on a total of some 9 000 core supporters. The same applies
in virtually
every single city and town in the country.
The MDC
won despite a totally subverted electoral process.
It is important to
remember that as bad as the electoral process was in the
2000 parliamentary
election, the process was a cakewalk then compared to
now.
In 2000
we did not have the Public Order and Security Act, youth brigades,
a
subverted police force and judiciary, a thoroughly manipulated voters'
roll
and food shortages. In 2000 we did have international observers, far
more
money to campaign with, and a relative absence of fear.
Since
the 2000 election, the MDC has been subjected to an unrelenting
assault.
Virtually every single leader has been detained, many have faced
spurious
prosecutions and other forms of harassment.
Hundreds of thousands of
MDC supporters have been intimidated through
killings, beatings, threats and
denial of access to food. The party has been
drained of resources through
having to protect the thousands of its leaders
and supporters who have had to
be provided with medical care and legal
representation.
Thousands
of Zimbabweans who voted for the MDC in 2000 have been
disenfranchised
through unconstitutional means. Thousands of "ghost" voters
have been
introduced to urban constituencies.
Whilst we were able to field
candidates in every single constituency in 2000
we were unable to do so this
year through the combination of Zanu PF thugs
preventing candidates from
getting their nomination papers in and partisan
judges subverting the legal
process in favour of Zanu PF. In other words,
the regime has done everything
in its power to crush the MDC and to subvert
the electoral process in the
last three years.
It is for all of these reasons that the MDC's
victory was truly amazing and
why I thought Robert Browning's words so apt.
The regime has thrown
everything at us. The regime has done unspeakable
things to our friends and
relatives it has murdered, raped, tortured,
assaulted, detained and
spuriously prosecuted but it has failed. We have
indeed fallen only to rise;
we have indeed slept only to wake.
I
have but one final thought which is for those responsible for
perpetrating
all the horror that has befallen our beautiful nation. It comes
from Edmund
Burke who wrote the following words in 1775: "The use of force
alone is
temporary. It may subdue for a moment: but it does not remove the
necessity
of subduing again; and a nation is not governed, which is
perpetually to be
conquered."
Zimbabwe is only held by Zanu PF
through force, not by popular will of the
people. These results demonstrate
that force has only subdued the people of
Zimbabwe for a moment. In reality
Zanu PF no longer enjoys the respect and
support of the people and as such no
longer governs Zimbabwe.
Freedom is now just around the corner.
Makorokoto, Umhlophe, Congratulations
Zimbabwe!
David Coltart is
MDC MP for Bulawayo South.
Zim Independent
Limpopo Province - what Zim could be
By Tafirenyika
Wekwa Makunike
I WAS privileged to participate during the last week of August
in the
Limpopo International Investor Conference held in Polokwane at the
Meropa
Hotel and Casino.
The hotels were packed with international
visitors and it seems Limpopo's
campaign to be the Eden of Africa is clearly
bearing fruit.
Limpopo has been classified as one of the poorest
provinces, in South
Africa, yet as an economy it has maintained the fastest
growth rate of more
than double the national average since 2000. At this rate
its fortunes are
clearly set to change in less than 10 years. Under the
stewardship of
premier Ngoako Ramatlhodi, a pro-business and pro-investment
young team was
assembled and is making Limpopo one of the most attractive
investment
destinations this side of the Sahara.
This is a good
example of how proper leadership can make a difference to a
poor province as
opposed to political insults (kutukirira!) from rooftops.
Geographically,
culturally and historically Limpopo is much closer
to
Zimbabwe.
When one looks at the Mapungubwe historical site
there is no doubt that the
people who built the site are the same as those
who built Great Zimbabwe.
Incidentally the moulded gold rhino that they use
as one of their tourism
promotion emblems was discovered from this site as
well. When one listens to
the common languages spoken in the province such as
Venda and Shangani,
there are clear similarities to Zimbabwean
languages.
Looking at baobab (another promotional emblem) terrain and
what pertains to
the Birchenough Bridge in Manicaland the resemblance is
remarkable.
This is where the similarities end. When one juxtaposes
the two entities
together it is clear that Limpopo is a microcosm of what
Zimbabwe ought to
be in many respects with any semblance of leadership, but
is clearly not.
We have one of the most welcoming tourism facilities in
this part of the
world yet, with the exception of the Victoria Falls, we only
get the cheap,
back-packing, hitch-hiking visitors while others get the big
spenders.
One of the programme directors at the conference, Dr Ken
Kwaku, Africa chief
representative of MIGA (World Bank), aptly summed it up
when he said the
train was leaving. With actual projects that have already
been started worth
R10 billion on the menu scattered across mining, tourism,
infrastructure and
agribusiness, it was clear this was not one of those
speechifying sessions
we are accustomed to. In all the projects there were
clear empowerment
targets for historically disadvantaged persons instead of
the cat and mouse
investment scenarios.
I got an opportunity to
review some of the agro-processing industries being
implemented with the
technical assistance of the Centre for Scientific and
Industrial Research
(CSIR). With sufficient support; my former colleagues at
the Scientific and
Industrial Research and Development Centre (SIRDC) could
be pushing through
similar projects.
I had an opportunity to talk to many international
investors from the EU,
the US and a large contingent from Asia and whenever I
explained that I was
from further north they would nod their heads in
sympathy. It seems
investors from our Asian friends who have been talking
about implementing
large projects in Zimbabwe are in fact implementing them
right here in South
Africa.
My sympathy goes to Dumiso Dabengwa on
the numerous unfulfilled promises he
made on behalf of the Matabeleland
Zambezi Water Project. International
investment is not about philanthropy or
political solidarity but about
making money. No sane person would park his or
her money in a political
environment where there is no guarantee of getting
it back.
Recycling trips to Malaysia and other Asian countries will not
change that
state without good investment
guarantees.
Notwithstanding the rapid advancement in investment,
there are still many
areas that are crying for attention such as genuine
broad-based empowerment
not just of the politically connected, poverty
reduction and education.
Despite the ultimate economic disaster that
has befallen Zimbabwe because of
Mugabe's poor leadership, the man did well
in his early days in improving
access to higher education and many of us are
beneficiaries of this.
Speaking to various black South Africans at
the conference, I was not
surprised that many view Mugabe as some kind of
hero for poking his finger
in the face of the white man. Yet when I asked
them if they wanted someone
like him in stewardship of their economy no one
replies.
I explained to them that I have been a supporter of land
reform in Zimbabwe
but I am totally against self-serving political chaos
masquerading as land
reform. Does it mean only one nearly 80-year old man is
capable of
implementing land reform and no one else can lead our nation? I
explained
that their position was the greatest political insult to the
collective
intelligence of Zimbabweans since a similar scenario was
perpetrated on the
people of Malawi during the Kamuzu Banda
era.
It is well and good to have a big political ego like Mahathir
Mohamad of
Malaysia after first developing your economy and empowering your
own people.
It is totally misplaced to copy the same when seven million of
your
inhabitants are hungry and you have a begging bowl in hand while
insulting
those you are begging from.
The greatest irony of the
Limpopo Province is that most of the lowest paid
farm workers in the area are
Zimbabwean and to a lesser extent Mozambican.
When you jump your border due
to hunger in your country you cannot negotiate
for your wages from any
position of strength and usually you take what is
given.
With
absolutely no protection of unionised labour and the threat of
deportation
hanging over their heads, they are left entirely at the mercy of
some
unscrupulous employers.
This is what happens when we wreck our country in the name of building it.
Tafirenyika Wekwa Makunike is a
SA based business consultant.