Mthuli’s budget: The good, bad and ugly 

In September, while meeting fund managers in New York, Finance minister Mthuli Ncube said what the economy needed was a “big bang”, a shock to the system.

Source: Mthuli’s budget: The good, bad and ugly – NewsDay Zimbabwe November 26, 2018

In September, while meeting fund managers in New York, Finance minister Mthuli Ncube said what the economy needed was a “big bang”, a shock to the system. A week later, he brought that big bang; on the advice of banks and industry, he separated United States dollar accounts from local real-time gross settlement and bond note deposits, and introduced a new 2% tax on electronic transactions.

Finance minister Mthuli Ncube arrives at Parliament to present the 2019 budget last week.

The shock therapy didn’t go as planned. Demand for foreign currency spiked and prices soared, denting Ncube’s credibility.

The result was that in his first budget presentation on Thursday, Ncube looked like a man who wanted to do both; he was over-cautious not to shake any more tables, yet still showing some determination to bring a spendthrift government to heel.

In the end, his budget has everything; the good, bad, and ugly.

The Good

There was stuff that Ncube did well, especially on trying to end the reign of the evil twins; Treasury Bills and the overdraft.

Domestic debt stock stood at $9,6 billion as at end of September 2018, and Treasury Bills (TBs)have been the biggest culprit. They became the new Zimbabwe dollar, “printed” by the government when it needed money to fund its greed. When TBs were not enough, government simply called the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) for an overdraft.

Here is how Ncube proposes to stop this; TB maturities in 2019 are estimated at $2,2 billion, which Ncube admits is “unsustainable in one year”. He is looking to restructure this debt.

TBs will now be strictly for the financing of short-term cash-flow demands, not to pay off big government bills as before. TBs will also now be allowed only with a Treasury Bill Issuances Note by the accountant general.

TB issuances will be through an auction system, although details of this are not yet clear.

According to the law, the government was not allowed to borrow more than 20% of the previous year’s revenue from its RBZ overdraft. Government went well over that limit. Not only has Ncube committed to limit use of the overdraft, he has gone further and boldly cut this overdraft threshold from 20% to just 5%.

No more Zamco

Between 2009 and 2014, non-performing loans rose and reached a peak of 20,45% of all credit in September 2015. This bled the economy of dollars and left many banks in danger, and companies crippled. The Zimbabwe Asset Management Company (Zamco) was formed to take up the bad assets, so as to allow the indebted companies to free themselves of debt and attract new investment.

Zamco helped rescue companies such as Cottco, RioZim, StarAfrica, Cairns and Border Timbers, among others. In total, Zamco took over up to $1 billion in bad debts.

The downside is that TBs were being issued to fund Zamco. Ncube has now frozen new TBs for Zamco and wants to do away with Zamco altogether. “With immediate effect, Zamco will no longer assume further loans from the market. In addition, government will review Zamco’s mandate and consider the winding up of its operations which are being supported by government.”

Losing Command?

Government has moved to quietly retire Command Agriculture, the centrepiece of President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s administration and, some would say, his campaign platform. Command ate up $1,1 billion as at August 2018, almost three times the budget target of $401 million. Ncube said it “has been one of the major drivers of the budget deficit”, made worse by high default among beneficiaries.

Ncube announced that government was reviewing “the financing mechanism with a view of sharing the burden between government and the private sector”. He, however, gave no detail on how this would be done.

The Treasury boss said agriculture funding would be confined to support for vulnerable households, extension services, and research and development. In all, the Agriculture ministry got $989 million. Of all ministries, it has the biggest capital expenditure share, with $853 million set aside for that. Much of that capex is on irrigation systems, dams and mechanisation.

Ending Command Agriculture was a good move, and a daring one, given its political capital.

Recently, Surface Wilmar, the country’s biggest cooking oil processor, told government to dump the programme, and said it was ready to help with a better model.

No more youths

Never has there been a bunch more difficult to get rid of. Last year, then Finance minister Patrick Chinamasa tried to retrench 3 188 “youth officers”, really Zanu PF activists leeching off the Treasury. His decision was reversed by former President Robert Mugabe at a rally.

When Mnangagwa came to power, Chinamasa again tried it, announced in his December 2017 budget that they would be let go.

But the officers went to court, and it was ruled that they had been unfairly dismissed.

The Public Service Commission was then ordered to do it properly. Ncube said the youths would be cut loose by year end.

It will cost money in the short term. Government has already set aside $5,2 million for the three months’ cash in-lieu of retirement and $17,7 million for their pension benefits.

Sanitary wear

Ncube has removed customs duty on sanitary wear, in order to cushion underprivileged women and girls. The measure brought cheers from female MPs, who high-fived each other on the announcement.

However, Ncube said he was doing so for only 12 months. He is also exempting imports of sanitary wear from value added tax.

Ghost busting

The opposition often quotes a 2010 Ernst & Young audit report, which was never made public, as the source of their claim that there were more than 70 000 ghost workers on the government payroll.

In her 2015 report, Auditor-General Mildred Chiri found 3 500 ghost workers drawing salaries totalling $21 million. A civil service audit conducted in 2015 put the number of ghost workers at 3 307.

Despite years of promises to clean this up, it never happened. But from January 1, civil servants would be vetted via a biometric system, and would have to produce letters of employment, qualifications and identity cards. “The above system will ensure that every person being paid by government for services rendered is properly accounted for.”

Ncube’s budget is stronger on public accounting than previous budgets have been.

He takes on several recommendations, ignored over the years, from the Auditor-General and Parliament’s budget office. One such issue is on the system of allowing government departments to keep a portion of the money they raise, without sending it to the consolidated revenue fund, the central pool of all the money that government makes.

This system started in the hyperinflation era, when departments pleaded to be allowed to keep their money so that they could use it quickly, as bureaucracy meant that the money would lose value fast. But the Auditor-General has raised red flags over this many times; she has warned that government may be losing millions due to mismanagement of these retained funds.

In fact, in one report, in 2016, she revealed that some police stations were not even banking earnings from traffic fees. Zimbabwe National Road Administration had also misused millions in retained funds. A report last year by Parliament’s budget office said up to $1 billion might have been raised by departments, but the money never reached central government.

Ncube says there is a “fundamental weakness” in the retention scheme and all revenue must now go directly to the consolidated revenue fund. He will, however, need to cut out the bureaucracy to make sure that funds go quickly where they need to go, or else there would be disruptions to government operations.

Ncube even now restricts the use of government vehicles; civil servants can no longer use cars outside office hours for private business.

The bad

There are steps that Ncube took that will potentially have a negative impact on the economy, especially on the poor, who are having to carry much of the burden.

Fueling the fire?

Inflation is already on the march, and Ncube expects it to close the year at 25,9%, having reached 20,85% in October. Adding fuel to the fire, Ncube has increased excise duty by 7 cents per litre on diesel and paraffin and 6,5 cents per litre on petrol. The duty will now be 38,5 cents for petrol and 33 cents for diesel.

Ncube’s reasoning on this? The volatility we have seen on the currency markets has distorted the fuel market, such that our fuel is now “relatively cheaper compared to prices obtaining in the region, creating an arbitrage opportunity for local consumers and transiting vehicles”.

But consumers already pay too much tax on their fuel. Apart from the excise duty, consumers pay 8,2 cents and 2,8 cents for every litre of petrol and diesel, respectively, towards paying off an old Noczim debt. There is also a Zinara road tax and carbon tax priced into every litre. In addition, did Ncube not, just last month, say foreign truckers would be forced to buy fuel in US dollars?

Businesses never need a second invitation to increase prices, and news of the increased excise duty may see more price hikes.


Ncube had been expected to scrap the 13th cheque, but government will actually, for the first time in several years, pay $175 million bonuses inside the current financial year. There is a reduction, however, since it’s paid only on gross pay.

The wage bill will rise by 5% to $4 050 billion in 2019, although its share of total revenues will come down to 61% from 73% in 2018. Health got the third largest chunk, $694 million, with 66% of that going to the wage bill and the rest set aside for operations, maintenance and capex.

Defence ($547 million) and Home Affairs ($518 million) were fourth and fifth, respectively. Of the defence budget, 71% goes to salaries, while the home affairs ministry spends 83% of its allocation on its workforce.

Ncube is laying off 419 civil servants above 65 years, which would save $4,2 million a year, but he has not gone far enough to cut the wage bill, which he says is still 90% of revenues.

Forex duty

Importers of cars and other i luxuries will now have to pay duty in foreign currency.

Ncube said this was “in order to redirect use of scarce foreign currency to the productive sectors of the economy”. Car dealers were already buying and selling vehicles in foreign currency, and it seemed only logical that duty reflects that. And by forcing luxury imports to pay duty in forex, Ncube is imposing a tariff on imports, in some ways more effective than SI 122.

However, the measure made a mockery of government’s insistence that the US dollar was at par with RTGS or bond notes. This may also drive up demand for foreign currency. It will make it harder for many low income owners, who earn only local currency, to ever own a car.

The ugly

These are some of the ugly things that Ncube and, indeed, the entire Government, could do without.

Do as I say, not as I do

There is a line in Ncube’s budget that shows government’s hypocrisy on austerity. “In order to assist senior public servants, whose input is invaluable under very difficult circumstances, government proposed to provide for duty-free importation of vehicles under the scheme, subject to prescribed conditions.

So, while demanding foreign currency payments for car import duty from everyone else, “senior civil servants” will not have to pay duty entirely.

The 1:1 lie

The government is sticking to the 1:1 parity. According to Ncube, “government commits to preserving the value of money balances on the current rate of exchange of 1 to 1, in order to protect people’s savings and balance sheets”.

Ncube’s thinking on this, expressed in the budget, is this; floating the currency without any reserves to back it up will see the rate going through the roof. Local balances would be decimated, and prices would rise.

This makes sense. However, demanding some duties in US dollars contradicts the entire insistence on currency parity and presents an image of policy contradiction.

If Zimbabweans can barely wrap their heads around why the government claims local money is equal to the US dollar, while speaking of “foreign currency” for duties and fees, then imagine how confusing it must be for any of the foreign investors that the government is so desperate for.

Currency committee

The government still insists on the RBZ allocating foreign currency to importers. Concessions have been made to mines; they can now keep 55% of their export earnings in US dollars. However, they still need to queue at the central bank for allocations.

Even worse, Ncube has set up a “Foreign Currency Allocation Committee”, which would decide who gets what money. Ncube claims this committee will have “broader representation as was the case in the past”, and that it was only temporary. But it is an apparition that should remain in the past and has no place in a free market.

New Parliament

Government is spending $3.2 million on a Parliament building that the country does not need. The budget for it will be supported by US$31.9 million from China.

After rival political parties in 2013 conspired to increase the number of MPs, the current Parliament can no longer accommodate the 270 lower house MPs and 80 senators.
The proposed new Parliament building will fit 655.

The new building will forever stand as a middle finger to Zimbabweans, who are begging their government to cut its size and live within its means.

The United Kingdom, which has a $3 trillion economy, is happy to squeeze 650 MPs into its 437-capacity House. Zimbabwe, whose economy is a fraction of Britain’s size, somehow believes it deserves more space.

Of course, no politician from either side of the aisle would support cutting Parliament. None of them wants to leave the gravy train. It would take strong leadership to push for that. But nobody is showing the stomach for such radical steps.

Zimbabwe does not need 655 seats for MPs. In fact, the country needs less politicians.


Ncube has done well on measures to chip away at the budget deficit, with his steps on TBs and the overdraft. He has also worked hard to improve the management of public funds.

Government has talked for years about a “one stop shop” investment agency and ease of doing business reforms, without ever showing concrete commitment. In his budget, Ncube finally puts this into action with an allocation of $41 million to set up the Zimbabwe Investment and Development Agency, (Zida). A Zida Bill has been crafted and approved by Cabinet.

However, there is also far too little detail on key areas, such as the cost-cutting measures.

Overall, the budget leaves Zimbabweans with less money in their pockets, while government’s only sacrifice is a token 5% salary cut for senior officials, ministers and their directors, State enterprise CEOs and the President.

The austerity is for the poor, and the prosperity for those leading government.

What now?

Now that Ncube has presented his budget, his battle is to actually make sure it happens. His strategy to tame the currency and inflation crisis is to attack its roots, which is State spending and borrowing.

He had all the right words, peppered with quotes from renowned economists and philosophers. But all that counts for nothing, should Zanu PF remain stuck in its greedy ways.

Ncube said: “Achievement of the above will require us to be unflinchingly disciplined, and make hard choices that require us to forego and postpone some expenditure to future years when our economic performance has improved.”

From now on, as he tries to implement what he’s proposed, in the face of inevitable resistance from those who cannot change, his job is going to get even tougher, while his credibility would be placed under even further scrutiny. — newZWire


  • comment-avatar

    Waffle Mthuli and nothing will improve until you sort out the two currencies problem – 1 USD does not appear to be equal to one Mabondi – more like 1 USD equals about 5 mabondis

    Zimbabwe and formerly Rhodesia has had this problem with trying to rig the value of the USD since 1961 when Exchange control was brought in. Let the market decide the value of a USD and then all will come right comrades – trust in the market and not some mumbo jumbo number !