Zimbabwe issues arrest warrant for top author

Source: Zimbabwe issues arrest warrant for top author

Arrest warrant: Tsitsi Dangarembga
Arrest warrant: Tsitsi Dangarembga Thomas Lohnes POOL/AFP

Dangarembga, 63, is seeing her doctor in Germany and “missed court for medical reasons,” her lawyer Chris Mhike told AFP.

“We expect her to be well enough to return to Zimbabwe imminently, and to attend to the outstanding court processes.”

Dangarembga was arrested in July 2020 for staging an anti-government protest alongside her neighbour in the affluent Harare suburb of Borrowdale.

Standing by the roadside, she held a banner that read “We want better — reform our institutions.”

Dangarembga was charged with inciting public violence and freed on bail the following day.

Nearly two years on, the trial has still not started and Dangarembga has filed to have the case thrown out for lack of evidence.

A magistrate’s court on Monday was due to rule on her request, but issued the arrest warrant when she failed to show up.

Dangarembga will seek to have the warrant cancelled, said the lawyer.

The ruling on the application for discharge will now be handed down on August 4.

Dangarembga was charged after staging a roadside protest on the anniversary of President Emmerson Mnangagwa's election
Dangarembga was charged after staging a roadside protest on the anniversary of President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s election ZINYANGE AUNTONY AFP

Dangarembga stepped into the international limelight in 1988 with her debut novel “Nervous Conditions,” the first book published in English by a black Zimbabwean woman.

The work earned her the prestigious Commonwealth Writers’ Prize the following year.

The Berlin International Film Festival (Berlinale) last week called on the Zimbabwe government to clear Dangarembga “of all charges, or to drop the case.”

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 1
  • comment-avatar
    Remedio Fernandes 1 month ago

    The idiocy of our justice system knows no bounds. Two years later, this simple case is still dragging on and it is evident to any reasonable-thinking person that the intention is simply to inconvenience the “accused”.
    To issue a warrant of arrest when the reason for absence from court is legimate and explained by the legal team borders on the absurd. Is the magistrate unable to discern and rule according to the circumstances?