Govt defends Unity Day holiday

Source: Govt defends Unity Day holiday | The Herald May 24, 2016

Daniel Nemukuyu Senior Court Reporter
GOVERNMENT has urged the Constitutional Court to dismiss the case in which Chitungwiza legislator Mr Alexio Musundire and civic activists Mr Tinomudaishe Chinyoka and Ms Coliwe Mufaki are challenging the constitutionality of declaring December 22 a national holiday.

The application, according to Government lawyers, was a waste of the court’s time and the court must refuse to entertain it.

The trio, in the constitutional challenge, argued that December 22 was not a national holiday, but a commemoration of a unity between two political parties — Zanu and PF Zapu.

The day was set aside to celebrate the signing of the 1987 Unity Accord between President Mugabe’s Zanu and the late Vice President Joshua Nkomo’s PF Zapu.

President Mugabe was cited as the first respondent, Home Affairs minister Ignatius Chombo was listed as second respondent.

The Home Affairs Minister is the one responsible for the administration of the public holidays and Prohibition of Business Act.

It was the trio’s argument that compelling everyone to celebrate the day as a public holiday was unconstitutional.

In a notice of opposition filed at the Constitutional Court recently, permanent secretary for Home Affairs Mr Melusi Matshiya said no one was forced to attend the unity day celebrations in Zimbabwe and no rights have been violated.

“Applicants have not alleged that they were ever forced to attend the celebration or commemoration held on Unity Day, and as such, there is no basis for alleging that their rights to freedom of assembly and association have been violated.

“There are several holidays that are celebrated which do not necessarily apply to each and every member of a particular population such as Easter and Christmas to name a few.

“Public Holidays can never universally apply to all people hence no one is forced to participate in the commemorations, pertaining to any public holiday.

“Wherefore respondents pray that the application be dismissed with costs,” Government argued.

Government said the fact that some people do not like the date does not make declaration of the holiday unconstitutional.

“There is nothing unconstitutional about the declaration of the 22nd of December as National Unity Day.

“It would be absurd to find it unconstitutional simply on the basis that it is either contrary to applicants’ opinions or that applicants do not want the day in question to be a public holiday for reasons personal to them,” it is argued.

The application, Government argued, does not establish any constitutional violations, hence it must be dismissed.

President Mugabe was wrongly cited by name in the application, when at law he should be cited in his official capacity.

The parties are yet to file heads of argument before the matter is set down for hearing.


  • comment-avatar
    ntaba 6 years ago

    It seems that 22nd December needs to be kept as commemorative holiday for all the civilians Zanu has murdered in the last 36 years. We shall call it Gukuruhundi Day as a matter of respect for those eliminated in Mugabe and Shiri’s Genocide. It will be good for a true and accurate legacy to be left about Mugabe, Shiri and the Fifth Brigade so that Zimbabwe does not forget. The holiday is already there in place – and as we recall Joshua Nkomo signed it to prevent further genocide of the Matabele civilians – so it is simply a case of changing the name to Gukuruhundi Remembrance Day.

  • comment-avatar
    ntaba 6 years ago

    On this occasion I actually support the Government. The holiday must stay. Simply, the name needs to be changed to Gukuruhundi Remembrance Day.

  • comment-avatar

    Unity Day surely commemorates not National Unity but the brutal subjugation of the Ndebele by the 5th brigade.
    I recall Mugabe’s self satisfied smirk as he forced Joshua Nkomo to sign the Unity Day Accord, purportedly uniting Zanu PF and PF Zapu, and then renaming the new united party …. Zanu PF. What sort of unity is that?
    It was just one more step along mugabe’s chosen road to one man rule, and i shall never celebrate that day.

  • comment-avatar
    Tongogara 6 years ago

    How can one say I’m not affected when I can’t go to work? We might as well have an “Inclusive gvt day” for 2008 unity, a “New dawn day” for 2009 new currency and the latest “Bond Day”.