Is it cowardice or fear?

Source: Is it cowardice or fear? – DailyNews Live

Maxwell Sibanda, ASSISTANT EDITOR      30 January 2017

HARARE – Remember firebrand politician and former Zanu PF legislator
Margaret Dongo who in the early 1990s caused pandemonium in Parliament
after she called Zanu PF MPs, including cabinet ministers, “Mugabe’s

Among those incensed by the remarks was the late liberation war icon,
General Solomon Mujuru, who was then a legislator in the august House that
he wanted to beat her up, insisting he was his own man!

Other MPs had to restrain the General as he launched himself across the
parliamentary floor, and Dongo had to be escorted home by police details.

Her only crime was questioning why all these men in Zanu PF never
questioned or challenged Mugabe. Dongo was finally dismissed from Zanu PF
in 1995.

And fast forward to 2017, years after Dongo’s assertion, then enters one
Julius Malema the South African Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader who
recently fired shots from across the Limpopo alleging “those comrades in
Zanu PF are a group of cowards, scared to say to an old man like
(President Robert Mugabe), `please with due respect, let go'”.

And so incensed were the “men” from Zanu PF that spears toward Malema were
thrown from every other corner.

But are Zanu PF members all cowards or “Mugabe’s wives” because our
history has it on record that they have been several who tried to
challenge the strongman and got fired from the party.

We have the likes of Dzikamai Mavhaire who became popular in 1998 after
openly calling for the resignation of Mugabe in Parliament. However, this
led to his expulsion from Zanu PF.

Following his fallout with the party, Mavhaire allegedly became a vendor
in Masvingo and bounced back into the party in 2008 before he was expelled
again from the party in 2015.

The late Edgar Tekere who was close to Mugabe served in government before
his popularity as a potential rival to the strongman caused their
estrangement. He was also expelled from Zanu PF in 1998 after he strongly
disagreed with Mugabe’s belief that Zimbabwe would be better governed as a
one party State.

Tekere, who was popular not only because of his unquestionable role in the
liberation struggle but also because of his rebellious nature told Mugabe
then that: “A one-party State was never one of the founding principles of
Zanu PF and experience in Africa has shown that it brought the evils of
nepotism, corruption and inefficiency.”

Coupled with his disagreeing with Mugabe’s mooted one-party State Tekere
was punished for his consistent criticism of corruption within government.

The late Edson Zvobgo was another Zanu PF official who challenged the
president although he is known mostly for having been the mastermind of
the legislation that enthroned Mugabe as leader of a single party State in
Zimbabwe in the 1980s.

In the 2002 elections he refused to campaign for Mugabe and criticised new
public order laws and draconian measures to curtail freedom of expression
in the media.

He, however, became the subject of an internal party disciplinary inquiry
in 2003 after being accused of disloyalty.

And then there was the 2004 Tsholotsho debacle in which a group of Zanu PF
officials were accused of plotting a palace coup against Mugabe before
they were rebuked or suspended.

Come 2014 Zanu PF fired those it suspected of attempting to challenge and
topple Mugabe. Among them were former Vice President Joice Mujuru together
with senior Zanu PF officials Didymus Mutasa, Rugare Gumbo, Nicholas
Goche, Mavhaire, Andrew Langa, and Munacho Mutezo.

So, maybe they are not all cowards after all, but Mugabe has probably
instilled a sense of fear among party members such that they are merely
scared of facing his wrath – thus they follow his orders no matter how bad
and they always try to outdo each other in hero worshipping the


  • comment-avatar
    Mazano Rewayi 5 years ago

    It’s neither cowardice nor fear but selfishness. Zanu PF rewards well those who “worship” the top man, just like the UANC with Muzo. What Bob has done extremely well is to keep charlatans in the top echelons of the party and so anyone who threatens the system will always be in the minority. It is therefore folly to expect change to come from within that party.