Uncommon thinking on the issue of political reforms

via Uncommon thinking on the issue of political reforms – The Zimbabwean 25/02/2016 by Vince Musewe

The problem we face is not political reforms per se, it is the fear of political reforms by ZANU (PF). Except we address that fear, we will continue to have resistance to change.

The end times of tyranny and plunder are with us as we see the craftiness of ZANU (PF)’s evil confounding them. By their own cunningness they are digging a pit so deep for their own demise. That is truly the work of our God who will make the wise things of this world foolish.

I truly believe that our beloved country Zimbabwe is at the cusp of a fundamental power shift. However, we must not just watch in anticipation as ZANU (PF) rips itself apart, but we must get ready to work and reinvent our country so that at last our dreams deferred since 1980 can begin to become a reality.

The implosion within ZANU (PF) is a predicable development and I squarely put it on President Mugabe’s lap who has failed to nurture predictability and leadership succession because of his unrestrained selfish ambition.

It is obvious that without any political reforms, we cannot expect to create the new Zimbabwe we all want. However, I must repeat, political reforms are not and have never been in the interests of ZANU (PF) especially now that they are at their weakest. They will resist them at all costs as they have done since 2000.

For the avoidance of any doubt, I am not saying here that we must not have political reforms. Rather I am saying we must find the most effective means to remove the resistance to change by ZANU (PF) first so that we can have political reforms followed by free and fair elections which I have no doubt that ZANU (PF) will lose. This is because whatever we have been doing to date is clearly not working and so we must come up with a totally new approach.

In my opinion, our problem is not the lack of political reforms per se, our fundamental problem is the fear by ZANU (PF) of political reforms. Except we address that fear, we will continue to have resistance to change by ZANU (PF).

There is a phenomenon in systems thinking called the iceberg phenomenon. Systems thinking is the label for a worldview which seeks to identify the root cause of problem situations rather than at snapshots or events. This worldview tries to see that which is not immediately obvious. We therefore need to understand and manage the underlying causes of the resistance to political reforms by ZANU (PF) if we are to achieve any progress on the issue.

So for example, we are simply demanding political reforms without looking deeper into the issue of fear -the iceberg underneath.

Systems thinking has been described as Uncommon Sense. When faced with complexity in the internal- or external dynamics of any system as we do here in Zimbabwe, it is useful use this systems lens to avoid unintended consequences and resistance to change.

With this systemic insight, we can then learn to intervene more effectively, in high leverage areas, within the complex dynamics of politics, power and the need to change. Continually shouting at ZANU (PF) to change, as we are all doing now, may not result in the change we want to see.

In my opinion, ZANU (PF), especially its leaders, fear to lose power through free and fair elections. Understandably so, because that loss of power may result in personal criminal persecution, loss of income and status. This fear is the same which is causing succession battles as Mugabe holds onto power. It is clear that the more we demand for political reforms, the more resistance to change we are getting.

The question therefore must be what realistic options should we pursue to get the results we want?

In my opinion, the one option is through some sort of political settlement and not wasteful contestation with ZANU (PF) because we simply do not have any other means to fight them as they did the colonialist. We certainly do not want a civil war and even if we did, the geopolitics of the world, particularly the region, have changed significantly to make that a viable option.

According to research by Edward Laws (August 2012) titled “Political Settlements, Elite Pacts, and Governments of National Unity- A Conceptual Study”, a growing body of recent scholarship puts political settlements at the centre of the development process. The political settlements approach focuses on the formal and informal negotiations, bargains, pacts and agreements between elite actors, as crucial drivers of the emergence of locally effective institutions and policies that promote the achievement of sustainable growth, political stability and socially inclusive development.

Surely that is what we want? I know we have been there before and, for many reasons, it didn’t work. I however think we should try again but this time with hindsight.

Going to 2018 elections without any reforms is political suicide and therefore unthinkable. I would rather we postpone elections and pursue an inclusive political settlement that addresses the fears of ZANU(PF), but ushers in a new era of inclusive democracy through comprehensive political reforms over an agreed timeframe.

Food for thought?

Vince Musewe is an economist and author based in Harare. He is also the Secretary for Finance and Economic Affairs of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP). The views in this article are his personal views. You may contact him on vtmusewe@gmail.com


  • comment-avatar

    very optimistic.
    zimbabwe is actually well on its way to being an african north korea.

  • comment-avatar
    Mazano Rewayi 6 years ago

    Perhaps if this was another country a negotiated settlement would work. However, Zim has tried this at least three times with no success. The Lancaster House agreement of 1979, Unity Accord of 1987 and the GNU of 2009 all attest to this. The reason for failure is simple – zpf always negotiates in bad faith. Trusting them is foolish. Nkomo was destroyed, Morgan made irrelevant, Qaddafi d lost USD360 million worth of oil, the Chinese have egg in their faces over the Chiadzwa Diamond fields. Even the DRC cannot trust Zim anymore after being looted under the guise of Pan-Africanism and regional unity. Thus, the system in Zim needs to be uprooted not accommodated. Yes, there is no need for retribution. Even asking the current “leaders” to give back their loot such as multiple farms will be counterproductive. Just assure them they will not be prosecuted and that they will keep their loot – their ineptitude will ensure they loose it all once proper systems are instituted. What should be the absolute minimum is to ensure that the current “leaders” are not allowed to influence the direction of the new Zimbabwe – they think at such a tangent to people’s aspirations that they will derail any attempt at progress. Yes, asking them to reform is not gonna work. Fighting and blaming them will not help either. The only viable option is to do “a Muzorewa” or “a Kaunda” on them, i.e., go along with them as you organise of for their total annihilation at the polls. Mobilise everyone to vote against zpf. Even without a level playing field chances of winning are there. So long as people can vote for opposing candidates, there is a chance to dislodge a sitting government. Therefore, maximum use must be made of this opportunity. This is the lesson the opposition needs to learn in Zim, and learn fast. The strategy worked once in Zim against Muzorewa, in Malawi against Banda, in Zambia against Kaunda, in Kenya against Moi, in Madagascar against Ratsiraka – it surely can work (again) in Zim!! We need to present a unified opposition and send as many people to the polls.

  • comment-avatar

    do zimbabweans have a vision for their society or the country, or are we only waiting for our turn “to eat”. ?