Learn from Nkomo’s ouster – Vince Musewe

via Learn from Nkomo’s ouster April 17, 2014 by Vince Musewe in NewsDay

“We believe that the true unity of the people of Zimbabwe is founded on fundamental principles rather than personalities”

History always repeats itself and at most times, it does so in a different fashion with strange agitators and bedfellows and yet, its essence is always unchanged; it demonstrates repetitive interminable underlying themes, like waves pounding the sea shore, but we remain oblivious or choose to ignore its lessons.

I have read Masipula Sithole’s Struggles within the Struggle for the umpteenth time, and it is quite intriguing how resemblances of current events jump out at you from historical chronicles.

I occupied myself with the chapter on the Zapu-Zanu split in July 1963. I am still trying to understand why it happened and what we can learn from it, given what is currently happening within the MDC-T. I was pleasantly surprised.

From Masipula’s account, his elder brother, Ndabaningi, penned a document titled The Reasons for Our Action; a narrative that sought to justify why the late former Vice-President Joshua Nkomo, the then president of Zanu, was no longer a suitable leader.

The reasons mentioned in this document are: that Nkomo was unwilling to go to jail while his followers where being jailed in Rhodesia; that he was hiding information from the executive and deliberately misleading them; that he had become a law unto himself and dealt severely with anyone who dared to disagree with him; that he suspended executive members, these being Sithole, Leopold Takawira, Moton Malianga and Robert Mugabe in an arbitrary, unconstitutional and undemocratic manner; that he was beginning to whittle down other people’s freedom of speech and was becoming selfish and self-centred; that he took the decision to establish a government in exile in Tanganyika (now Tanzania) without consulting his executive and duped them into going there; and that he was indecisive, a vacillator, impulsive and irrational.

I quote: “While the people elect leaders, they reserve the right to criticise them and if need be, to change them. If popular criticism results in denunciation, suspension and witchhunt by the leaders, then such leaders are not worth their salt and such leaders should not handle the affairs of the party on a personal and arbitrary basis. We believe that the true unity of the people of Zimbabwe is founded on fundamental principles rather than personalities.”

The book further talks about James Chikerema, and how he tried to personalise Zapu after the split. It is perceived that he began to believe that Zapu belonged to him and the rest should follow him as the leader. This was, of course, rejected outright and his use and focus of “I James Chikerema” was cited as the most dangerous development in the struggle for Zimbabwe.

Interesting also is how Mugabe took power from Sithole in a “coup” and became acting president before a congress was held. After this was reversed by the Frontline States, the party was de facto split anyway and we saw Mugabe emerging as the sole leader, while Sithole tried in vain to regain legitimacy.

Our history is littered with unnecessary deaths and casualties that occurred because of fundamental leadership disagreements and thirst for personal power. This history continues to haunt us to this day.

Our history is now repeating itself within the MDC-T albeit with new actors, circumstances and intrigue. All the same, if we are to learn from it, we must learn some facts; that the aspiration for political power always corrupts; that there has never been a constitutional and smooth change of leadership in Zimbabwe’s political parties.

Always, the existing leaders resist change, seek absolute control and want to hold on, but ultimately they lose influence and the very leadership positions that they coveted so much.

Of course, Mugabe has cunningly avoided this at all costs by ensuring that no contestation of his leadership occurred during his reign. Any contenders or potentials are quickly dealt with accordingly, thus making it dangerous, short-sighted and suicidal for anyone to challenge him — that is the only reason why he has prevailed. His control of the armed forces has, of course, further cemented his dictatorship.

Despite our cry for democracy and constitutionalism, Zimbabwe’s political parties that claim to promote and want democracy have, in fact, never dispensed democracy within their ranks. They are true hypocrites hiding under the skirt of democratic freedom fighters.

I continue to stand by my notion that political parties are hardly democratic platforms, especially when it comes to attaining positions of influence within them. They are, therefore, unlikely to deliver the democracy we seek.

There is also this myth that political elective congresses are the ultimate exercise of democracy and, therefore, convey incontrovertible legitimacy of leadership, which is utter nonsense. We know that votes are bought, people who do not support the incumbent are purged and face all sorts of calumnies before congress, dissenters are side-lined and are never given a voice at congress and ultimately, friendly votes are pre-loaded to ensure that leaders retain their positions. Results are always a culmination of intrigue and intricate manoeuvre for power by all. It is really much ado about nothing.

How then can we ever expect organisations that do not practice democracy within to be champions of our freedom?

Let these truths force their way into the brains of the judicious and let us, therefore, all do what we must to save Zimbabwe from repeating the same mistakes that have created the very conditions which we seek to change.

The people come first!

Vince Musewe is an economist and author based in Harare. You may contact him on vtmusewe@gmail.com


  • comment-avatar
    Roving Ambassador 9 years ago

    Good say , we should not repeat the mistake of choosing leaders for convenience sake. We should be careful of the Mugabes, Maduku and Tsvangirais of this world.
    Pasi ne mbavha.

  • comment-avatar
    John Thomas 9 years ago

    It is easy to name political leaders who stood for ideas greater than themselves and who were in the game to further these ideas and not for personal gratification. Nelson Mandela, Abraham Lincoln, Lee Kuan Yew, Aung Sang Suu Ki, Winston Churchill, Arch Bishop Desmond Tutu. There are hundreds more. Then there are the leaders who have voluntarily left power when their time is up. This would include every leader who has left power after losing an election. Why does Zimbabwe have to adhere to ways that have proven over and over to be untenable? We hear Nkomo spoken of as father of the nation. This is high praise for a bullying thug. Mugabe himself is a simpering weasel. what is it in our society that makes us choose leaders who reflect the very worst in us? Where are those men and women you meet every day who reflect the best? Why are they not supported and followed?

    I think it is because too many people are prepared to overlook their long term interests for cheap promises and lies. Populist rhetoric goes down well round here. Critical thought is in short supply.

    Lets be critical. Lets tear down demagogues before they become too strong and we find ourselves powerless.

    If the opposition manages to unite and throw out the rubbish who currently lead us let us not let these new rulers become so strong as ZANU has been

  • comment-avatar
    Dzatsva 9 years ago

    Is it not time to invite Masiyiwa to lead.People like you Vince seem just to know how to pen good artcles,you side line yourselves from the real battles.You are our new Makumbe,but i believe if you are to be given positions in politics,your relevance will wilt,because there is no room for reasoning in politics

  • comment-avatar
    Madlinduna 9 years ago

    the dilemma is that the people of Zim are fond to personalities,tribal lines,historical imbalances and mistrusts when it comes to political choices and reasoning.Your delineating Mr V of our Politicians’ history(previous and current)of self centeredness and personalizing struggles might be spot-on but a few care.The rest choose sides and ignore facts.We first need a change of attitude towards issues in Zimbabwe as one people and one nation with one cherished egalitarian future.Thereafter it might be impossible for any to make us their subjects and tools of personnal aggrandzsement.

  • comment-avatar

    How would you rate a cabinet that consists of Simba Makoni, Jonathan Moyo, Tendayi Biti, Nkosana Gumbo/Moyo(the spineless) and so and so, in that order? There are some good characters that are still in ZANU PF but it is unfortunate that they are riding in the wrong boat. Vana Gonowo can play advsory roles nanaChamisa na Weshman Ncube. Hameno ikoko.

  • comment-avatar

    Where do u find perfect Politicians?please guys tell me.Politicians are all the same.you are good b4 u become a politician.once in you change even Vince will change.lets deal wth what is there until change is there no form Useless Parties because so and so has done this .sit down and iron out yr differences .we wont get anywhere with Splits.zanu had never had a split and anyone who wanted to derail the Struggle ws silenced and it achieved its objective.pasi neAtengesi that ws the moto,nw you have the Mangomas ,Biti ,welsh and the pen pushers there to confuse people peddling good theories and have no stamina to take the bull by its horns.i myself respond to yr articles and im firmly on the ground fighting these Zanoids head on.please guys the road is thorny the one who is trying physically to fight this regime support him.Zanu and Mdc are different unless you hve your own project you say they are the same so that you get few votes and get to parliament wth 2 or5 mps therebyderailing the struggle Mdc and people of Zim is waging.i knw selfish people wont listen bt the Truth is MDC-T you will nevr kill it coalitions or what even if you join together with Zanu on a fair Election.

  • comment-avatar

    If Joshua Nkomo was here today with Mugabe,who would you rather have as the President? I’ve always looked with suspicion those who claim to uphold democracy and constitutionalism yet want to lead through unconstitutional ways. The same things that Nkomo was accused of back then are the same things Tsvangirai is being accused of by those who want to lead the party even it means doing so unconstitutionaly
    outside congress. The question is, won’t we be creating another Mugabe who can wrestle power by means tantamount to a coup and then years later we look back and say it would have been better if we had a sober minded person like Nkomo as a leader?

  • comment-avatar

    Well said Tats

  • comment-avatar
    innocent chauke 9 years ago

    poverty and lack of a decent education are the enemies of democracy which make the dictators like mugabe to have a strong grip to power. If societies can deal effectively with the above mentioned enemies of humanity, then the dictators will not have the opportunity to flourish.