Biti Tears Mnangagwa Apart 

Biti Tears Mnangagwa Apart 

Source: Biti Tears Mnangagwa Apart | ZimEye

By Langton Ncube| Opposition leader and former finance minister Tendai Biti has said president Emmerson Mnangagwa on Wednesday wasted an opportunity to clearly present Zimbabwe to the world by dodging crucial issues that should have been cleared years ago.

MILITARY IMPLODING, OPPOSITION IMPLODING ZIMBABWE AFTERWARDS – DISCUSSION YESTERDAY

MILITARY IMPLODING, OPPOSITION IMPLODING ZIMBABWE AFTERWARDS – DISCUSSION YESTERDAY

Publicerat av ZimEye den 26 januari 2018

Mnangagwa addressed the World Economic Forum in Davos on Wednesday where he was interrogated over several issues including the contentious land question.

According to the Standard Biti argued that Mnangagwa could have used the chance to show the world how sincere he was in his efforts to revive the country’s economy. Biti said by dodging the questions, he came across as someone with something to hide.

“He fudged the Gukurahundi issue which even he himself knew is a matter of interest both to Zimbabwe and the world.

Addressing well that issue could have put him in a better standing. He dodged whether he still wanted white farmers or not.

He couldn’t answer clearly whether he wanted international observers or not. All these issues need clear articulation. Making a presentation at Davos, however, does not cure the economy which is in shambles,” he said

Biti said the presentation was a continuation of former president Robert Mugabe’s terrain, adding that he had to walk the talk.

“Mnangagwa must walk the talk. How can we talk about investments when foreigners can’t take a cent out of the country and when there is no ease of doing business?” he said.

Economist John Robertson concurred with Biti, pointing out that Mnangagwa’s presentation did not live up to the task he went to Davos for.

“I’m disappointed in the paper he carried to Davos. Whoever prepared that paper for him did not put much effort. It does not have much information that will lure investors into the country. Overall, he made a good impression but he could have done more on mining, agriculture and tourism. He was also given little space. People will be inquiring about inflation but he did not have that. It’s not enough to draw expertise from all over the world,” he said.

Robertson said banks should be the ones to fund command agriculture to make it a long-term project which will cater to the country’s food needs.

Mnangagwa told delegates that Zimbabwe is now able to produce surplus grain regardless of drought, backed by the command agriculture scheme.

Robertson said Mnangagwa needed to realise that the country cannot be sustained on contract farming but needs long-term financing and strong back-up.

“Mnangagwa still feels the country can do well with contract farming. Farming is a big business that requires more commitment and big investments especially funding from banks not to rely on government funding as is happening now. We have an uncertain climate we need back-up and it costs money and long-term commitment,” he said.

However, local economist Tapiwa Mashakada, who is also MDC-T Hatfield MP and former investment and economic planning minister, commended Mnangagwa for striking the right cord in Davos.

“The president made very positive remarks about Zimbabwe’s economic prospects and he addressed investor concerns about security of investments. This is as it should be and it’s good for Zimbabwe to shed off its pariah status,” he said.

Mnangagwa has said there shall be no racial discrimination when it comes to land ownership under the new administration in Zimbabwe but government will ensure that non-commercial farmers are capacitated to enhance economic growth through agriculture.

Zimbabwe has been undergoing economic turmoil for the past two decades which has been characterised by a crippling liquidity crunch, severe cash shortage, high unemployment and investor flight.

“As the new administration we don’t think along racial lines. That’s a philosophy of the past. Farmers are farmers. Those commercial farmers who happily integrated into our systems by agreeing to have their farms downsized according to ecological regions have remained, we value their skills and the non-commercial farmers need to be trained and capacitated. It is a deliberate policy we are making,” he said.

Mnangagwa said he has no doubt that with the model of agriculture introduced, the country will be self-sustaining in terms of food production and even record a surplus whether there is drought or not as the country has been able to create a strong water body base.

On the key issue of indigenisation, Mnangagwa reiterated that all other sectors are now open for negotiation except for the two key areas of platinum and diamond mining.

Last week, the government unveiled a post-election investment promotion blueprint anchored on the protection of investment and property rights as the capital-starved southern African nation pushes for re-engagement with the international community.

He also told the delegates that the Gukurahundi issue was one which the government of the day should apologise for.

Mnangagwa admitted that the economy is in tatters because of bad decisions that were made in the past.

While government would adopt and implement consistent and transparent policies that render a competitive and preferred investment destination, the reforms undertaken will seek to improve Zimbabwe as a competitive investment destination.

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 8
  • comment-avatar
    TIMMY 6 years ago

    SORRY FORMER MINISTER TENDAI BITI,BEING ONCE IN A GOVERNMENT SYSTEM AS A FINANCE MINISTER AND BEING AN OPPOSITION FIGURE DOES NOT EMPOWER YOU WITH ABSOLUTE KNOWLEDGE,YOU ARE OFFSIDE!!YOUR COMMENT HAS TO DO WITH TRYING TO BE RELEVANT IN THE NEW DISPENSATION U ARE ONLY TRYING TO BE CONTRADICTORY WHICH TO YOU MEANS YOU ARE AN OPPOSITION BECAUSE U WILL OPPOSE EVERYTHING WHETHER GOOD OR BAD .GO BACK TO THE SPEECH ,REREAD IT OR LISTEN AGAIN THEN U CAN BRING YOUR ILL-ADVISED AND BASELESS COMMENTS.KANA WASHAYA JUST BE RELAXED IN YOUR GLASS MANSIONS YOU BUILT THRU YOUR ESTEEMED SWEAT.

  • comment-avatar

    Yes ‘mistakes’ were made alright. And hundreds of thousands of lives, if not millions, ruined. And Mugabe still lives in his palatial home with his stolen billions because he is an ‘icon’

  • comment-avatar
    Johann 6 years ago

    It wouldn’t hurt the economy or the general policy of giving land to the black majority if the President returned lawful ownership of the BIPA owned farms that were confiscated or immediate compensation thereof. Proof of his sincerity in the protection of future foreign investment has to be galvanised in past experience.

  • comment-avatar
    Johann 6 years ago

    The “Strong water base” the President talks about was generally constructed by Private investment from the now extinct private ownership of land. It came to an end in the year 1998 and those privately owned reservoirs haven’t been maintained since that time.

  • comment-avatar
    ace mukadota 6 years ago

    Mugabe is not only an ICON in ZW but to many he is a modern day JESUS.
    Even many ZANUPF members of Parliament actually said this and I think they really belevied what they said.
    ZW same circus but now run by different clowns

  • comment-avatar
    Guest 6 years ago

    Mnangagwa dodged relevant key issues which did not really convince the panel on whether Zimbabwe was actually ready to attract investors. These issues are as follows: 1.refusal of a direct apology to affected victims of gukurahundi 2.returning of land back to former white commercial farmers 3.accredition of other international observers besides the EU and UN who are interested to come and observe the elections 4.the present criteria of arresting corrupt officials whether G40 or lacoste 5.the capacity of ZEC to deliver a free and credible elections 6.the immunity given to the Mugabe family.

  • comment-avatar

    ED missed the opportunity in not showcasing Zimbabwe as a NEW business destination. He could have skillfully steered the conversation instead of being cornered into the past. This was an economic summit and should have stuck to economic issues: New regulations, ease of business and tremendous opportunities in Mining, Agriculture, and Tourism. In the end, I was curious about Zimbabwe but far from ready to open my wallet.

  • comment-avatar

    The past Mugabe administration was not Jesus, it was simply a nasty robbery exercise, you have bought this completely. How can anybody think he is Saint as your country is now in the state it is, There is little business and the rest of the world thinks you are joke. Up to your necks in Debt, Sewage and Litter.
    Start by returning things to as they where when it last worked. Then look at the bigger picture and work it from there. I am not arguing that the black indigenous population do not deserve land / prosperity etc, just the opposite. But what is point of having a system in place that does not produce the results. After all did not mainly blacks work these farms, industry, transport? Earned money? lived a good life? health care….What the hell do they do now, grow a few vegetables? beg? sell useless trash The alternative is completely the other way, through the rest of the ‘investors’ out, murder one another, die of hunger (Do not ask the west for handouts etc) but also dismantle the railways, roads the telephones, the electricity, the Tv, Radio, health care, cars water supply (do a Pol-Pot). Did we not give you anything? What did Mugabe give you?- the road to a Praia state. Its simple really the past lot sold you lies; the sanctions, the white men taking everything, the president takes all syndrome; (sat in his Rolla, well fed, wearing a western tailored suit! with his dolly bird). Unfortunately in this world there is class of individuals who will not face facts only bar talk. Frankly I cannot see why you are not taking all their ill gotten gains as forfeit. Jesus lived (if he did) in Sandals, Simple clothes etc, the image of him is of a kind, considerate person who thought of others, before himself. Whether real or otherwise this is what the book says – a model for life.