Source: Mugabe playing dangerous political game – DailyNews Live
Gift Phiri 6 August 2017
HARARE – Our news editor Gift Phiri talks to Stephen Chan, a professor of
world politics at the School of Oriental and African Studies at the
University of London, about the vexing developments in Zanu PF’s
convoluted line of succession. Chan is currently on a working visit to
Harare.
Below are excerpts of the interview.
Q: First Lady Grace Mugabe dropped a bombshell at a Zanu PF women’s league
national assembly meeting in Harare on Thursday, calling on her husband –
for the first time – to anoint a successor. What do you read into her
move?
A: I think that there may be as it were some element of political strategy
on the part of the first lady. In other words, I think that she
understands that it might not be a good time for her to make her own
presidential bid, but if she were a vice president, then she could buy her
time while the next president really looks after a transitional
administration. So, perhaps, this is a movement not so much to assure
Zimbabweans about the future in immediate terms of the country, but
looking beyond the 2018 election to the one afterwards.
Q: After the first lady raised concern, as the secretary for women’s
affairs, that Zanu PF should revert to its resolutions that one vice
president’s position be reserved for women, Mugabe retorted: “I want to
accept that we made a mistake because we had agreed that one of the three
top positions in government must go to a woman.” Do you get a sense that
Mugabe is moving to appoint his wife one of his deputies in the State and
party?
A: I think that there may well be a kite being flown here so that the wife
might become one of the vice presidents. At the same time president Mugabe
is hedging his bets by saying that maybe there could therefore be three
vice presidents. So nobody is threatened right now by just adding one to
the party the two current vice presidents will stay in place; at the same
time, that would give the first lady the kind of platform that I think
that she wants to have.
Q: By suggesting three VPs, isn’t the president saying in a way he is not
willing to dispose of his long-time ally Emmerson Mnangagwa but is willing
to accommodate his wife in the apex of the party and government? Obviously
VP Mphoko is safe because of the tribal balancing act in the presidium
ushered through the 1987 Unity Accord, but the G40 looks hell-bent on
disposing of Mnanangwa, isn’t that so?
A: The G40 wants to get rid of him, that’s for sure. But I don’t think the
president can get rid of him very easily. It’s not just the balancing act
in terms of regions like between the current two vice presidents, but also
someone like Mnangagwa has got very, very strong military support,
certainly from General Chiwenga and you can’t just dismiss that by a snap
of fingers. So all of these things need to be balanced, the positions and
opinions of the war veterans need to be balanced in the equation. Right
now I think Vice President Mnangagwa is going to be in the vice presidency
for the duration right up until the next election.
Q: At the Chinhoyi youth interface rally on Saturday, the first lady told
the crowd that the two vice presidents and herself serve at the pleasure
of Mugabe. What do you read into this?
A: I think she is giving hints there that everyone is in a, let’s just say
a conditional position. And it’s true that the president can select vice
presidents, this is not a problem in terms of the Constitution. But she is
also making the point that the president can appoint vice presidents as
well as annul their appointment. I think this is very much a play so that
she may attain one of the three top positions which she already, really,
really has in terms of influence, that she be called vice president.
Q: She dressed down the presidential spokesperson George Charamba at the
Chinhoyi rally, accusing him of allegedly capturing the State-controlled
Herald newspaper, fighting with ministers, ignoring her charity projects
in Mazowe and portraying Team Lacoste in positive light in the listed
State newspaper. Isn’t this some conflation of State and party given that
Grace – who is not a government official – is giving instructions to
Charamba how to run his government department outside constitutional
structures
A: I think this is all part of the political battles in this country right
now where people take swipes at other people, almost leading to events in
essence where she would want to take the allies of people they perceive as
their opponents or their political enemies. I don’t think there is much
mileage in this. These are just warning shots across the bow at this point
in time. The main target I think lies in the future, not in present day
where there are difficulties with one person or another.
Q: Others in the youth league and women’s league have suggested that
Mugabe’s wife must succeed him, perhaps to protect the first family’s
personal interests and security. What’s your view of this suggested
dynastic rule of sorts?
A: Well, the interest of the country really should come before the
interest of one family. However, having said that, the first lady has been
very busy, and been very successful in courting their support, precisely
the women’s league and the youth league. They have become, as it were,
strongholds of her foundations for her. So it’s natural that they should
support her. But then the whole idea of dynasties is something which
perhaps is not the best way of looking at how to govern a country.
Q: Others suggest this call to anoint a heir is all choreographed to get
alleged G40 candidate Sydney Sekeramayi to succeed Mugabe. Is this
feasible, or it’s all part of manoeuvring by Grace to get the top prize?
A: Yah, if Sekeramayi becomes the next president, but then Mrs Mugabe
becomes the vice president, that gives her a perfect position, as I say,
not for the 2018 elections, but for the elections five years after. And by
that time, what would have happened is that there would have been normal
relationships, or reasonably close to normal relationships established
with Western countries. And so the name Mugabe won’t be as quite
problematic for Washington and Whitehall at that point in time, five years
after 2018. In those international political terms, it might be a very
wise move, provided of course the opposition parties don’t grow stronger
in that interim. But at this moment of their dis-organisation, they will
have to work very, very hard to be a credible alternative to government
after 2018
Q: Mugabe also suggested at the Chinhoyi rally that he might be
considering retiring some top security commanders. These have been part of
his dynamos in previous elections.
A: He has to do this very, very carefully because those generals provide a
very great deal of political strength. Having said that, it’s normal in
militaries around the world for generals to be retired at a certain age.
This is so that there be can a constant dynamic renewal in the military.
The first role of the military is to defend the country. And you have to
have leaders that are absolutely up to date with modern ways of conducting
the defence of the country. Even in Great Britain, the most senior
generals get one term at the top and they are replaced in what they call
the chairman of the defence staff and then they have to go. So this would
not be abnormal. However, here it’s a dangerous political game.
Q: It would seem the generals have been hammering Prof Jonathan Moyo for
criticising Command Agriculture being spearheaded by Mnangagwa, and you
have the first lady saying Moyo is being unfairly targeted. This looks
like open warfare, what’s happening here?
A: Well, in fact, Jonathan makes enemies where ever he goes. He is very
skilled at this and it doesn’t seem to bother him too much. He is very
much like the Machiavelli of Zimbabwean politics. One can only admire the
great skill with which he does this. However, what you have got, you have
so many of these faction fights now within Zanu PF that everyone seems to
be forgetting about something called Zimbabwe, the country Zimbabwe. And
none of the factions, and this is what amuses me as an outsider, none of
these factions actually has a financial policy for the future health of
this country. No one is actually putting forward a plan for what the
factions stand for, for the renewal of the financial base of this country.
So, they are fighting for power and the big question you have got to ask
is, do they really have an interest in project Zimbabwe.
Q: The first lady is also seeking to exonerate Moyo of these corruption
charges. Do you get a sense that she is out of order? You have the
Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission handling his case and the courts.
Isn’t this an abrogation of the sub judice rule?
A: She is out of order, if it’s before the courts, then the courts must
decide. And quite frankly, I think that Jonathan Moyo would like to see
this resolved procedurally. Well, say what you like about him, but he is a
creature of rule of law who in terms of most of these issues he would like
to see procedure going through the normal way of doing things.
Q: He is saying this is political victimisation, that the charges are
trumped-up.
A: Judges are judges. Believe it or not, we have a great deal of faith in
the standard of the judiciary here at the highest level in Zimbabwe. Rule
of law is something which is very, very important to which ever faction
wins the government. Without law, without constitutional law, without
independent judges, a country is nothing.
Q: With many expressing exasperation with Mugabe’s feared declining health
and increasing frailty, he says he is OK.
A: He says he is okay and certainly when he is in public he can give a
very, very good appearance of being okay. Like everybody, like Zimbabweans
observing this from around the world, people are concerned about the
frequency and the duration of his visits to places like Singapore for
instance and what you have got, I think is the need for a very great deal
of medical care, that kind of very advanced health care in his old age.
And he is now approaching being the oldest head of State in the world and
this must take a toll. And I don’t think it’s his age that is so much a
problem, but it’s being unable to keep up with the latest modern
developments in the world, the latest modern techniques of government and
certainly, the latest modern techniques of economic governance. If you
cant keep up with those, whether you are an old man or young man, the
country is going to suffer.
Q: Were Mugabe to be incapacitated, resign, removed from office or die,
the new Constitution states that until 2023, the vice president who last
acted as president assumes office as president for the next 90 days until
the party nominates a replacement for consideration by Parliament. Doesn’t
this raise the spectre for chaos?
A: In fact, the Constitution does say that. So, in fact, the vice
president would hold office for a short period of time. But then it’s
quite right, according to the Constitution that the party should be able
to select the person. I don’t think the party would be irresponsible. I
think that they would try to select somebody who would be of benefit to
the country. My great fear is that they will select someone purely on
political grounds rather than on grounds of competence to run the country.
Q: There are fears that perhaps someone from outside the party presidium
could be leapfrogged into State House because the military is now heavily
involved in succession politics.
A: You know, what I would like to see doesn’t have anything to do with any
personality or anybody’s name or anybody’s support base. I look at other
countries like France with a very young man (39-year-old Emmanuel) Macron
as the president, I look at Canada with a very young man (45-year-old)
Justin Trudeau as prime minister. I believe that young people should lead.
If there is leapfrog by a young person who understands the modern world,
I’m going to support.
Q: At the very highest levels of Zanu PF, there is no longer even a
pretence of party unity, with rival factions in a zero-sum game. So, what
does the future hold for Zanu PF?
A: There is no longer any pretence of unity; there is no longer any
pretence of youth. (LAUGHS) You have got a double problem here. You have
got a lack of modernity and you have got a lack of unity, it’s a joint
problem. It’s not just a lack of unity; no one has got ideas about running
the country. And I have to say that I think that the opposition parties
are in exactly the same position. Where is the complex programme for the
future that makes sense when examined by experts financing. Politics and
economics are big informers.
Q: Do you think Grace could the president at some point?
A: I don’t think she will be the president until the next elections after
2018. In other words, you are looking at 2023. Yeah, it’s a possibility.
And in fact, at that time, if she is the vice president, she would have
learnt how the country really works in its deep detail. We don’t have an
objection to Grace Mugabe, we do have an interest in proper democracy
above all and proper policies
Q: Do you think she could sustain this momentum post- Mugabe, post-her
husband’s rule? Some critics are saying her power is “sexually
transmitted”.
A: (LAUGHS) Power may not be sexually transmitted so much. Having the
support of her husband at this point of course is very, very important.
But she is a skilful operator, she is becoming a very skilful operator and
I wouldn’t write her off completely and at the same time, I do think that
we are going to have a period of great volatility afterwards. And if there
is an interim president, and I’m saying interim because both Mnangagwa and
Sekeramayi are very old men, 73 and 74, this is not a youthful generation
and not everyone lives as long as Robert Mugabe. So I would be surprised
if any successor to Mr Mugabe lasts more than five years before they do
look for a more youthful person. But five years is a long time in
politics.
Q: And any prospect of a Mnangagwa presidency?
A: There is a prospect, there is a prospect. I wouldn’t write him off. I
think that he would want to remake himself, so he is user-friendly to the
West. I think that he will try to be as skilful as possible. And I think
that the West would appreciate any overture to it along modern lines, I
keep stressing this. It has to be a modern vocabulary with a modern
agenda.
Q: Do you think Mnangagwa has a modern agenda?
A: At this stage, there is no sign of anybody having an agenda.
Q: Thanks so much Stephen. I really appreciate taking the time to grant us
this interview.
A: Well, let me say that I am a friendly-critic; I want this country to
succeed. And when I criticise, it’s very much in that spirit.
COMMENTS