Zimbabwe Sails Close to Economic Rocks

via IPS – Zimbabwe Sails Close to Economic Rocks | Inter Press Service By Jeffrey Moyo

With the time for empty promises and electioneering now over, there is a crisis of expectation; promises were made to the people and it is now payback time

For President Robert Mugabe to defeat the opposition in the Jul. 31 election by hook or by crook may have been a walk in the park, but beating the economic crisis will be another matter. The stock market fell 11 percent the day he was sworn in, the biggest fall in a day since 2009.

Fears are rising that the policies of the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) will further scare away foreign investors.

Zanu-PF’s current policy mix is in conflict with the needs of investors, and at present Zimbabwe is the least attractive investment destination worldwide,” John Robertson, director of the Robertson Economic Information Services told IPS.

“Any proposition that an economic turnaround can be launched by the new government will depend upon the speed at which improvements can be brought about in the population’s purchasing-power, depending upon a recovery in employment.”

According to Zimbabwe’s Indigenisation Act of 2007, foreign-owned companies are forced to cede 51 percent of their shares to local people. But economists warn that the indigenisation policy is driving investors away.

Foreign investors are obliged to bring in 100 percent of the capital, bear 100 percent of the risk, provide 100 percent of the technology, and in turn settle for 49 percent of the equity and pay taxes,” independent economist Kingston Nyakurukwa told IPS.

Mugabe’s policies have been a particular blow to agriculture. Agriculture provided employment for 60-70 percent of the population before the 2000 land reform programme that enforced greater local ownership of farms.

Agriculture used to contribute 15-19 percent to the country’s annual Gross Domestic Product before the reforms. “President Mugabe presided over the seizure of productive commercial farms, rendering a blow to agricultural production. And when agriculture performs poorly, the rest of the economy suffers,” independent economist Agrippa Ndlovu told IPS.

Zimbabwe is now a net importer of agricultural products.

“Industrial and agricultural exports fell drastically between 2000 and 2008 owing to unfortunate political developments, particularly the 2000 commercial farm seizures, followed by a series of disputed elections between 2002 and 2008,” economist Tony Lewis told IPS.

Zimbabwe has had no grain reserves for more than a decade following the eviction of white farmers, despite promises by Mugabe of a return to food self-sufficiency in 2010.

Zimbabwe’s economy shrank significantly after 2000, resulting in widespread poverty and 80 percent unemployment.

Zimbabwe currently exports precious metals like gold, platinum and ferroalloys, and also cotton, textiles and clothing, and tobacco, but to limited trade partners due to sanctions imposed by western countries.

Presenting the 2013 mid-term fiscal policy review on Jul.10, Zimbabwe’s finance minister in the former government Tendai Biti said the earlier expectation of 5.6 percent growth by this year end would not now be possible. The estimate has been reduced to 3.4 percent.

Investment in this Southern African nation rose after the formation of the coalition government in 2008, resulting in foreign direct investment rising from around 50 million dollars to nearly 400 million dollars between 2008 and 2011. But now there are new uncertainties.

I am really not sure what to do now because President Mugabe may go ahead with his moves to indigenise the remaining foreign-owned companies; I am really scared of his economic policies,” 53-year-old Jamah Fakuh from India who trades in glass told IPS.

With indigenisation, Zanu-PF aims to transfer the majority share of any business operations to black Zimbabweans without financial compensation, which favours Mugabe loyalists,” economist Admire Dziva told IPS.

Godfrey Kanyenze, director of the Labour and Economic Development Research Institute of Zimbabwe, a non-governmental economic consultancy organisation, said huge challenges lie ahead for Mugabe’s government.

“With the time for empty promises and electioneering now over, there is a crisis of expectation; promises were made to the people and it is now payback time. Poverty is endemic and there are massive debts of over 10 billion dollars that need to be addressed,” Kanyenze told IPS.

Hyperinflation had made the country’s currency almost worthless in 2008. The economy stabilised in 2009 after conversion to the dollar as currency, and the formation of a coalition government between Zanu-PF and two opposition formations of the Movement for Democratic Change.

Under the four-year coalition government Zimbabwe’s economy grew nine percent in 2010 and 2011, and five percent in 2012. Not everyone is convinced that Mugabe’s government can bring an upswing back after the further decline expected this year.

Economic growth may wane if there is no political resolution which identifies a legitimate regime,” economist Christopher Mugaga told IPS.



  • comment-avatar

    Will the author please explain what sanctions he is referring to? The ones that he implies are limiting the country’s trading partners? I’m unaware of any sanctions other then the travel and asset limits on Mugabe and his cohorts. Please explain these sanctions? Who has imposed them and what is their purpose? Are they illegal, and if so, why? I’m not aware of any restrictions limiting foreign firms from dealing with Zim firms, unless they simply do not wish do do business with them for whatever reasons they may have.

    In fact I just read that the EU is Zimbabwe’s second largest trading partner after China. How can that be if there are sanctions limiting trade? It’s confounding to read about these nefarious sanctions all the time, but we’re never told what they actually are.

    • comment-avatar
      Observer 8 years ago

      Google ZIDERA and get educated.Notwithstanding Kimberly Process compliance we still sell our diamonds thru middlemen as the US intercepts wire transfers in $Us.

      • comment-avatar
        Haruna 8 years ago

        That little we are getting through the middlemen is unaccounted for. Bullshiiiit

  • comment-avatar

    Sounds like you are the one who needs to get educated. ZIDERA contains no restrictions on US companies dealing with ZIm companies. And the US has no ability to force foreign companies not to deal with Zimbabwe. If they do so it is for a variety of reasons that have nothing to do with the US or sanctions. So why is it that Mugabe continues to use the lamest of excuses for not knowing how to run a country?

    The article doesn’t even mention diamonds. Probably because they do not contribute to the country’s economy. All the money earned from diamonds is leaving the country. Instead the article talks about gold, platinum, ferroalloys, cotton, textiles, clothing and tobacco. There’s nothing in ZIDERA that deals with any of those commodities and manufactured goods, nor is there within the EU restrictive travel and shopping measures against Mugabe and his twits.

  • comment-avatar
    Hango Yapalala 8 years ago

    You aint seen nothing yet! Poverty is coming back!Empty shelves, lots of zeroooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos!Haha, thats zanyzanupf!

  • comment-avatar
    Greyhora 8 years ago

    There are two things that the evil Zanu PF cannot rig, 1. The Economy, 2. Death. They may have squirmed their way out of electoral defeat using “intelligence strategies”, but now they have to run the country, and cheat death at the same time… They have a record of failure at running the economy, and recently death has been stalking them, let’s wait and see!