AU Requests Kenyatta ICC Trial Delay

via AU Requests Kenyatta ICC Trial Delay Reuters October 12, 2013

ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA — African leaders agreed on Saturday that Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta should not attend trial at the International Criminal Court if the U.N. Security Council did not agree to delay the proceedings, Ethiopia’s foreign minister said.

Tedros Adhanom said that the African Union would request the trial be deferred under article 16 of the court’s Rome Statute that allows a delay of a year subject to renewal and would request a postponement if that demand was not agreed.

“If that is not met, what the summit decided is that President Kenyatta should not appear until the request we have made is actually answered,” Tedros told journalists, explaining decisions of a meeting to discuss Africa’s relations with the court.

Earlier, foreign ministers of the 54-member African Union agreed that sitting heads of state should not be tried by the Hague-based court.

“It should be underscored that our goal is not and should not be a crusade against the ICC, but a solemn call for the organization to take Africa’s concerns seriously,” Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn said in an opening address.

Leaders meeting in Addis Ababa at the AU headquarters are expected to endorse the recommendations hammered out by ministers in Friday’s meeting that extended past midnight.

Following that session, Ethiopian Foreign Minister Tedros Adhanom said trying Kenya’s president and his deputy infringed on that nation’s sovereignty. The two men deny charges that they orchestrated a killing spree after a disputed 2007 election.

Frustration with the ICC has been growing in Africa because the court has convicted only one man, an African warlord, and all others it has charged are also Africans.

The ministers did not call for a mass walk-out from the court’s jurisdiction, however. Officials previously said that idea would be on the agenda but it did not draw broad support among the continent’s 34 signatories to the court’s Rome Statute.

Rights groups had urged African nations not to turn their backs on the court, which they say is vital to ending what they see as a culture of impunity in African politics.

Hailemariam told gathered leaders that the court and the U.N. Security Council had showed a “double standard” in the way it treated Africa and said earlier African requests for deferring cases had been ignored.

“It is indeed very unfortunate that the court has continued to operate in complete disregard of the concerns that we have expressed,” he said.

Ethiopia’s foreign minister said a group led by the AU chair, now Ethiopia, with members from Africa’s five regions would press the U.N. Security Council to defer proceedings against Kenya’s leadership and the Sudanese president.

‘Demanding respect’

Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir speaks during a one-day summit in Khartoum, Sept. 3, 2013

While the Kenyan politicians have cooperated with the court, Sudan’s Omar Hassan al-Bashir is now subject to an arrest warrant after dismissing charges of war crimes and genocide.

“We underscored that sitting heads of state and governments should not be prosecuted while in office,” Ethiopia’s Tedros said, adding a one-year delay was being requested under article 16 of the Rome Statute.

Ministers called for using video links in the Kenyan trials to ensure leaders could carry on their official duties.

An April 2011 Combination picture shows Kenya’s Uhuru Kenyatta, who was finance minister, and William Ruto, former Higher Education Minister at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.

The court has yet to rule on whether Kenyatta and Ruto can be excused from large parts of their trials or whether they can participate by a video link. Proceedings, though not trials, against the two were underway before their March vote win.

“Demanding respect is the least Africa can do, but I also don’t like to see this mistaken for – as we have seen with some of the detractors of this exercise – that Africans are supporting impunity. We don’t,” Rwandan Foreign Minister Louise Mushikiwabo told Reuters.

Those comments were echoed by Ethiopia’s premier and others.

After wrangling over wording on Friday, one senior delegate described the result as a “good compromise”. Kenya said it had not sought a walk-out but said others had supported the idea.

Some Africans, including officials from heavyweights South African and Nigeria, had prior to the meeting indicated there was not broad backing for a walk-out from a court that received the backing of many Africans when it was set up.

London-based rights group Amnesty International urged African nations meeting in the Ethiopian capital not to cut ties with the court, saying victims of crimes deserved justice.

“The ICC should expand its work outside Africa, but it does not mean that its eight current investigations in African countries are without basis,” Amnesty’s deputy director of law and policy, Tawanda Hondora, said in a statement.

Kenyan Foreign Minister Amina Mohamed said she was satisfied with the outcome of Friday’s talks, adding that immunity for a sitting president was “a principle that has existed for a long time” in international law.

Lawyers for Kenyatta asked on Thursday that his trial on charges of crimes against humanity be abandoned, saying defense witnesses had been intimidated.

Ruto went on trial in The Hague last month and Kenyatta’s trial is due to start on Nov. 12.


  • comment-avatar
    Livingstone Chikoto 11 years ago

    If they can’t be tried while in office then why leave office and get tried.You become a life president to evade trial.

  • comment-avatar
    Chivulamapoti 11 years ago

    Like Mugarbage!

  • comment-avatar

    The Kenyans were already on trial when they ran for office, so it could be argued that they were running for office to potentially evade responsibility for their alleged acts. Bashir committed his acts as a head-of-state who has led his country for nearly 20 years, and he will probably continue to rule Sudan for the foreseeable future. So when is the ICC to try him for his human rights violations? Should they wait until after he dies in office?