Demystifying SA’s immigration laws

via Demystifying new immigration laws | Thought Leader. 13 June 2014 by Kaajal Ramjathan-Keogh

New immigration regulations are causing consternation among foreign nationals living and working in South Africa, as the provisions severely prejudice their fight to become documented.

One of the most concerning elements is the situation of foreign spouses and life partners of South African citizens or permanent residents. Those married and wishing to apply for relative or spousal visas or permanent residence may apply after their marriage. Unfortunately, the new rules discriminate against unmarried homosexual and heterosexual couples. They must prove they have been in a relationship for at least two years — a change to draft regulations that required proof of at least five years.

Draft regulations were open for comment in February and no information was available until we heard they would come into effect on May 26. The Immigration Act brings into operation amendments from 2007 and 2011, which were passed but stayed dormant. Since the end of last month, both the amended act and accompanying regulations have been in force.

The new rules make harsh changes to immigration laws. The asylum transit visa’s validity has been reduced from 14 to five days. This means new asylum-seekers have only five days to present themselves to lodge their applications, which is nigh on impossible if they arrive in South Africa anywhere other than Beitbridge.

Immigration requirements for travelling with children have become more difficult. If parents travel into or out of the country with a child, they must produce an unabridged birth certificate. When one parent is travelling with a child, they also need a consent affidavit from the other parent. These requirements are not publicised by the department of home affairs and have serious consequences for families unaware of them. While it is fairly easy to obtain a passport, the application for an unabridged birth certificate can take a long time. In recognition of the difficulties in acquiring these documents, the regulations on travelling with children will be applied only from September.

For general work visas, critical skills visas, intra-company transfer work visas and medical treatment visas, people must apply from outside South Africa. All categories of work visas will be issued for a maximum of five years, while a medical treatment visa will be issued for six months at a time. The National Scarce Skills List has been issued for comment but, because it has not yet been gazetted, no applications for critical skills visas can be lodged.

The contentious elements of the new rules are the declaration of people as “undesirable” and “prohibited” and the strict penalties that accompany this. In terms of regulation 27, people will be declared undesirable if they fall foul of these rules:

• If a person overstays for a period of one to 30 days, they will not be readmitted for 12 months;

• If a person overstays for a second time within a 24-month period, they will not be admitted for two years; and

• If a person overstays for more than 30 days, they will be undesirable and will not be admitted for five years.

The administrative penalty for “overstaying” used to be a fine, but this has fallen away and people will now have to leave the country for these periods.

The new laws also provide for “prohibited” people, who will not be admitted to South Africa under any circumstances. These include a prescribed list of those carrying infectious or communicable diseases or viruses, those against whom there is an outstanding warrant or a conviction of genocide, terrorism, human smuggling, trafficking, murder, torture, drug-related charges, money laundering or kidnapping. It also includes those who are found in possession of a fraudulent visa, passport, permanent residence permit or identity document.

And finally, all regional home affairs offices are closed to the public for temporary and permanent residence permits. Applicants now have to present themselves to visa-management company VFS Global to submit applications and pay an additional R1 350 handling fee. The privatisation of visa processing is in line with global practice. VFS Global will only receive applications, while decisions on these remain with home affairs. This move will one hopes mean each applicant is treated fairly. It is also a way to reduce corruption and processing times.

Whether these changes will result in positive outcomes remains to be seen. For now all we know is applicants will have to dig deeper to pay for the privilege.

Kaajal Ramjathan-Keogh is the head of the Refugee and Migrant Rights Programme at Lawyers for Human Rights.

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 13
  • comment-avatar
    Angela Wigmore 8 years ago

    I used to giggle back in the 80s, when the South African government was paranoid about journalists and the Press, because I was subject to very restricted visas just for holiday purposes. The reason was simply that I was a broadcaster on ZBC and also worked for College Press, which published school text books. I had nothing to do with journalism but just the names of my employers made me suspect!

  • comment-avatar
    Proudly South African 8 years ago

    “It also includes those who are found in possession of a fraudulent visa, passport, permanent residence permit or identity document”
    I very much love the above sentences because all those with fake South African I.D.’s but can cannot speak our language will now be declared undesirable whereby ending their honeymoon. Zimbos just go back home, enough with stealing our jobs and swindling our money out at every change.
    If you have a problem with that just stay home

  • comment-avatar

    Proudly South African you are not a South African you are a true Zimbo and i suspect that you come from the southern part of Zim thats were you see people like you who doesnt want to be known that you cme frm Zim,

    • comment-avatar
      Proudly South African 8 years ago

      Look here Zidonga sdenge. I have never been to Zim and will never ever go there. I have that country with all my heart. We’ve been developing our country for our kids only for people like you to come swindle every cent out of the country. I wish they can put me in the Home Affairs as an official to sort you all out quickly.
      Do us all a favour and stay in your country and literally run your own economy as you president once said.

      • comment-avatar
        original.chihota 8 years ago

        Only blacks are targeted by fellow blacks some races are automaticaly South African coz they have the right colour.

  • comment-avatar
    nyoni 8 years ago

    Now you are proudly South African. If it were not for Zimbabweans, Zambians etc you would be still grovelling to the baas.

  • comment-avatar

    Well said Nyoni

  • comment-avatar
    lazzy 8 years ago

    Proudly what???. This is a Zimbabwean who should be ashamed of himself. Migration has been there since time immemorial. You find that its strange that Zimbabwean shanganis and ndebeles from matebeleland are now at the forefront fuelling xenophobia in Sa nxa

  • comment-avatar
    original.chihota 8 years ago

    Zimbabwe was part of SA before the british took over .If sa gave back white waters ridge why can’t SA take back Zim as that is what it was in 1863.

  • comment-avatar
    Mukanya 8 years ago

    I bet no genuine South African has time to read and follow events on this platform. Anyone who keenly follows events here has connection with Zimbabwe. I have been living and working in South Africa to a point where I could ignore this platform, but nostalgia attracts me to it. Proudly South African is Proudly Zimbabwean and must be nostalgic like many of us who have either become permanent residents or citizens in South Africa. Sad indeed!!!

  • comment-avatar
    Petal 8 years ago

    its high time these human rights lawyers had a word with the Southern African Dictators Club and asked them why are they dilly dallyinig with free movement of the ordinary people. why are they not imposing restrictions on these thieving scub bag members of theirs ? just remembered of scumbags is about to become the Chair as it is rotational. this club has never prosescuted any one member
    the human rights lawyers are always there for the ordinary people – find out if you can get a seat – bet 100% they will be rejected

  • comment-avatar
    Swagman 8 years ago

    How many expatriates/diaspora are there in
    South Africa.

  • comment-avatar
    munya 8 years ago

    Proudly South African you are a shameless Zimbabwean. Its just as good you call yourself South African. Your documents are fraudulent and you are also a fraud so as to be non- existant. You are an embarrassment to humankind. What are you doing snooping on a Zim website. Half twit.